Biblical Studies Carnival #130

Biblical Studies Carnival #130 January 2, 2017

Jennifer Guo hosts the latest Biblical Studies Carnival.

Phil Long has information about upcoming carnivals, and your opportunity to volunteer to host one.

"ONE LAST THOUGHTAnd, this Postmodern approach is very important, because if we simply identify someone ..."

Another Nice and Accurate Call for ..."
"ONE LAST THOUGHTI don't know of many for whom it would be very useful/meaningful to ..."

Apostle Paul APB 2: Paul’s Fanaticism
"This is actually a good case study of what the early Postmoderns like Kierkegaard and ..."

Another Nice and Accurate Call for ..."
"I think that instead of asking whether Paul falls under the Category of Fanatic (which ..."

Apostle Paul APB 2: Paul’s Fanaticism

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • arcseconds

    I would be interested in your opinion of ‘On Biblical Scholarship and Bias’.

    • I do think that we are all prone not to recognize our biases – sometimes, for instance, we will date things late, and sweepingly dismiss things as fiction, because we were once told to uncritically accept them as early factual accounts by eyewitnesses. But just because the way we used to approach things uncritically was wrong, doesn’t make it inherently critical or correct if we merely swing to the opposite end of the spectrum. As scholars like John A. T. Robinson and James Crossley demonstrate, one can view the New Testament texts as early even as a theological liberal or atheist.

      And I’m starting to think that I need to revisit some widely-held assumptions about the gap that is posited between the historical Jesus and our early accounts about Jesus. I think that the gap, and the view that we cannot meaningfully say much about him, may be as much if not more so a theological buffer rather than merely a conclusion based on (purportedly impartial) historical investigation.