#CFP Moral Machines? The Ethics and Politics of the Digital World

#CFP Moral Machines? The Ethics and Politics of the Digital World June 28, 2018

From the symposium website:

“Moral Machines? The Ethics and Politics of the Digital World” is a symposium organized by two research fellows, Susanna Lindberg and Hanna-Riikka Roine at the Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies. The aim of the symposium is to bring together researchers from all fields addressing the many issues and problems of the digitalization of our social reality, such as thinking in the digital world, the morality and ethics of machines, and the ways of controlling and manipulating the digital world.

The symposium is free of charge, and there will also be a public evening programme with artists engaging the digital world.

As our visible and invisible social reality is getting increasingly digital, the question of the ethical, moral and political consequences of digitalization is ever more pressing. Such issue is too complex to be met only with instinctive digiphilia or digiphobia. No technology is just a tool, all technologies mark their users and environments. Digital technologies, however, mark them much more intimately than any previous ones have done since they promise to think in our place – so that they do not only enhance the homo sapiens’ most distinctive feature but also relieve them from it. We entrust computers with more and more functions, and their help is indeed invaluable especially in science and technology. Some fear or dream that in the end, they become so invaluable that a huge Artificial Intelligence or Singularity will take control of the whole affair that humans deal with so messily.
 
The symposium “Moral Machines? The Ethics and Politics of the Digital World” welcomes contributions addressing the various aspects of the contemporary digital world. We are especially interested in the idea that despite everything they can do, the machines do not really think, at least not like us. So, what is thinking in the digital world? How does the digital machine “think”? Our both confirmed keynote speakers, N. Katherine Hayles and Bernard Stiegler, have approached these fundamental questions in their work, and one of our aims within this symposium is to bring their approaches together for a lively discussion. Hayles has shown that, for a long time, computers were built with the assumption that they imitate human thought – while in fact, the machine’s capability of non-embodied and non-conscious cognition sets it apart from everything we call thinking. For his part, Bernard Stiegler has shown how technics in general and digital technologies in particular are specific forms of memory that is externalized and made public – and that, at the same time, becomes very different from and alien to individual human consciousness.
 
We are seeking submissions from scholars studying different aspects of these issues. Prominent work is done in many fields ranging from philosophy and literary studies to political science and sociology, not forgetting the wide umbrella of digital humanities. We hope that the symposium can bring together researchers from the hitherto disconnected fields and thus address the ethics and politics of the digital world in a new and inspiring setting. In addition to the keynotes, our confirmed participants already include Erich Hörl, Fréderic Neyrat and François Sebbah, for instance.
 
We encourage approaching our possible list of topics (see below) from numerous angles, from philosophical and theoretical to more practical ones. For example, the topics could be approached from the viewpoint of how they have been addressed within the realm of fiction, journalism, law or politics, and how these discourses possibly frame or reflect our understanding of the digital world.

The Call for Papers is open until 31 August 2018! For further information about the symposium, feel free to contact either Susanna (susanna.e.lindberg[at]gmail.com) or Hanna-Riikka (hanna.roine[at]helsinki.fi).

Via Religion CFP. See more on the Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies website.

"Oh, pardon me, I thought you were trying to make a serious point about the ..."

Not Liberal, Just Literate
"I made the initial point that climate science, serious climate science, was still a young ..."

Not Liberal, Just Literate
"What an odd comparison.It's probably fair to say that medicine was not a mature science ..."

Not Liberal, Just Literate
"I despise this kind of game-mastering, which sacrifices verisimilitude and enjoyment to pedantry and book-keeping.Reminds ..."

Sci-Fi, Superhero, Game, and Cinematic #CFP ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • John MacDonald

    I think scientists will one day be able to replicate human consciousness in machines. What we call Human consciousness, Canine consciousness, Arachnid consciousness, etc are just characterizations on the awareness level of a purely physiological state of affairs.

    • John MacDonald

      One last thought:

      I took a couple courses on Cognitive Science in fourth year in university and found the quest to make a computer model of human consciousness fascinating. Three interrelated programming problems I find to be particularly fundamental are:

      (1) Human awareness is particularly “ANALOGICAL,” both in reasoning, and in the way newly encountered information is appropriated in relation to prior existing knowledge structures. So, for instance, as a public school teacher, I always activated students’ prior knowledge before teaching new material.
      (2) Human awareness is extensively “METAPHORICAL,” in that the human brain actively “cross-translates” information from one sensory area of the brain to another (from visual to tactile, for instance).
      (3) Human awareness is actively involved in the process of “MIRRORING.” For instance, human infants mirror the expression on their mother’s face. Mirroring what we encounter is involved in how we make sense of ourselves and our inner states (e.g., metaphors like a “STREAM of consciousness,” or feeling “BOILING mad.”) States of affairs in the natural world are appropriated through mirroring to facilitate self understanding. Cross-culturally, “self-descriptive” language is similar because the world is similar in the various places you go around the planet.