This quote came to my attention not long ago:
There have been lots of things related to this theme that are worth sharing. For instance, this post challenging the idea that it is being overly intellectual that leads to a focus on doctrine and assent to propositions as defining faith, when it may be that the opposite is true:
I’d say an intellectual disinterest in the faith has a tendency to lead to a “head” religion. American Evangelicalism is almost entirely about right belief, and the content of those right beliefs. This is usually not due to some veneration of the intellect (although it can be that for certain individuals or congregations), but rather a definition of faith that involves being presented with cognitive content, assenting that content is true, and then never questioning it, again.
This is where the person with an intellectual interest in their faith starts to part ways. It can’t be left alone, and if someone starts poking hard enough, eventually something happens that rocks the boat.
It doesn’t mean the boat capsizes or takes on irreparable damage, but you begin to realize that you’re not pointed in the same direction, and you can’t really go back.
The problem with transcendence, as I understand it, is this: classical Christian theology in the wake of Dionysius affirms that God is a different kind or order of being than creation, such that all of the language we have for God is wildly inappropriate for speaking about God. And yet, we still speak about God.
Julie McVey explored the conservative Christian practice of shunning, and moving beyond one’s conservative framework while sticking with Jesus.
I remember when I first read James Fowler’s book, “Stages of Faith”. It shattered my fears of going off track or even backsliding. Instead, it helped me to frame the most anguishing periods of my spirituality as potential progress.
I happily discovered that doubts and questions are a crucial part of a healthy spiritual life…When I concluded spiritual valleys are necessary, my old concepts of spiritual growth changed.
I used to think of spiritual growth as linear. But I question that because it implies that you move along a line and leave the past behind you… forgotten, unappreciated, and unintegrated…
There were a few other items related to progressive Christianity. In the first blog post below I appreciated this quote: “What you promise when you are confirmed is not that you will believe this forever. What you promise when you are confirmed is that this is the story you will wrestle with forever.”
There has been some interesting exploration on more than one blog of what it might mean to be post-progressive.
See also his Faith Lies series.
What is said to be paradoxical in this piece about “Faith, Hope, and Trust” seems to me to be the very point: faith is about trusting precisely because we don’t know it all, and because we can never know it all, none of which invalidates the importance of trying to know and understand as much as we can.