New Working Paper: “What’s So Special About Religious Liberty? Law, Philosophy, and Serving God”

New Working Paper: “What’s So Special About Religious Liberty? Law, Philosophy, and Serving God” May 26, 2022

On March 24-25, 2022, I participated in the conference: “Beyond `Defensive Crouch,’ Religious Freedom.” It was hosted by the Liberty & Law Center of the Antonin Law School at George Mason Univeristy. The paper I delivered at the confernce is now available over at SSRN.  Entitled “What’s So Special About Religious Liberty? Law, Philosophy, and Serving God,” a final version of it  will be published later this year in GMU’s Civil Rights Law Journal.  Here is the paper’s abstract:

This paper addresses the question of the specialness of religious liberty. Rather than rehashing the many philosophical, constitutional, and statutory issues raised by legal scholars who defend what I call the Religion is Not Special Thesis (or RNS), this paper has a more modest goal: to reacquaint us with a venerable alternative to the RNS theory, one that I call the Two-Sovereigns Thesis (or TST). It is a view that many of the American Founders had in mind when they argued for incorporating its logic into state laws and constitutions. In presenting TST this paper draws our attention to those aspects of conventional religions that are often ignored or downplayed by RNS theorists, even though it is those characteristics of common piety that motivated the thinking of figures like John Locke, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, and the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council. This paper argues that the main reason for this neglect is that the RNS theory is eliminative in its application, meaning that as an interpretative tool it eliminates from our vision those aspects of religious belief and practice that have traditionally set it apart from other activities. I begin with an analysis of how religious speech is treated both as non-special and special in the U.S. Supreme Court’s religion jurisprudence, which lays the groundwork for an account of the Two-Sovereigns Thesis. I then explain how that thesis has better explanatory power than the RNS view in accounting for the religious nature of certain types of cases in American jurisprudence.

You can download an entirety of the paper here.


Browse Our Archives