Sometime next year (hopefully) Zondervan will publish a “four views” book on evangelicalism. Four evangelical theologians will attempt to define “evangelical” and “evangelicalism.” Among them will be yours truly and Al Mohler. Each of the authors will write a chapter followed by responses from the other three. I will make the undisputable point that evangelicalism is a movement and not an organization and therefore cannot have boundaries. Talk of evangelical boundaries is simply nonsensical. An organization has boundaries; a movement cannot have boundaries. In the past Mohler has said that a center without a circumference is impossible. That is, of course, not true. There are many examples of “fuzzy sets” with clear centers but not definite circumference. A social or religious movement is one clear example. One always has a center of interest around which adherents gather but one never has clear, definite boundaries. The moment it has them it is no longer a movement; it becomes an organization. The Evangelical Theological Society is an organization. Evangelicalism is a movement. The former has boundaries; the latter cannot have boundaries. This obvious fact is being overlooked in all the talk about “evangelical boundaries” in the past decade.