It’s about Time! Evangelical Leaders Meet to Discuss Evangelical Identity in the Trump Era

It’s about Time! Evangelical Leaders Meet to Discuss Evangelical Identity in the Trump Era April 18, 2018

It’s about Time! Evangelical Leaders Meet to Discuss Evangelical Identity in the Trump Era

According to an article published in the The Washington Post (by-line Sara Pulliam Baily) and re-published in my local newspaper this past week (April 9-13) A group of about 50 “top evangelical leaders” will meet at Wheaton College (Illinois) to discuss issues for American evangelicalism raised by the media’s and some evangelical leaders’ seeming identification of evangelicalism with right-wing politics.

*Sidebar: The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*

The article does not name all the invited evangelical leaders but implies that among them may be Tim Keller and Richard Mouw—two notable American evangelical statesmen. Ostensibly, anyway, the meeting will not have on its agenda specific discussion of President Trump, but evangelical support for him will be the “elephant in the room.” One organizer-leader of the meeting is quoted as saying “Given such strong support [of Trump by evangelical voters], a case could be made that the greatest barrier to the gospel is evangelicals’ embrace of ‘Trumpism’ as an ideology.”

I personally do not know what “Trumpism” is—as an ideology. I don’t see that Trump has any ideology except certain things he opposes. Surely an “ideology” must be more than that! Maybe he has one and I just haven’t realized it yet. (I don’t doubt that some of his supporters have one!)

But that’s a quibble; in general I agree with the statement.

My only qualm about this planned meeting is that it may not go far enough. The article suggests that a few of the invited participants may be Trump supporters. And, apparently, there is no litmus test for invitation/participation with regard to politics. (There should be; some political beliefs and practices are anathema to the gospel.)

In my humble opinion, what we really need is for some evangelicals to speak out very openly and firmly about a need to prophetically correct so-called evangelicals who refuse to criticize Trump and who, by their silence or expressed support for whatever he does, sully the reputation of conservative, evangelical Christianity world-wide.

As I have stated here before, I believe the time has come for a true Kirchenkampf among American evangelicals; we need to separate from us (or we from them) those self-identified evangelical leaders and their followers who seem to back and support the Republican Party of today and President Trump uncritically. (I am not talking about those who are thoughtfully critical but supportive. I would say the same about self-identified evangelical leaders who seem to back and support any political party and any politician or government leader uncritically!)

One evangelical leader quoted in the article, who will be at the meeting, served on an advisory group of evangelicals (implied in the article’s language is “to President Trump”) but resigned after Trump blamed “both sides” for the “deadly violence in Charlottesville after a white supremacist march.” I can respect that and wish that more evangelicals would do the same—with their seemingly uncritical support of whatever Trump says and does. At the very least they ought to send him a strong message, which this meeting may accomplish, that many American evangelical leaders are strongly disillusioned and for their continued support he must change his posture toward many kinds of people.

My hope is that what this meeting will accomplish, if nothing else, is to send a signal to the media and to the world that not all American evangelical leaders support Trump uncritically and that many do not support him at all.

*Note to commenters: This blog is not a discussion board; please respond with a question or comment only to me. If you do not share my evangelical Christian perspective (very broadly defined), feel free to ask a question for clarification, but know that this is not a space for debating incommensurate perspectives/worldviews. In any case, know that there is no guarantee that your question or comment will be posted by the moderator or answered by the writer. If you hope for your question or comment to appear here and be answered or responded to, make sure it is civil, respectful, and “on topic.” Do not comment if you have not read the entire post and do not misrepresent what it says. Keep any comment (including questions) to minimal length; do not post essays, sermons or testimonies here. Do not post links to internet sites here. This is a space for expressions of the blogger’s (or guest writers’) opinions and constructive dialogue among evangelical Christians (very broadly defined).

"Thanks for the recommendation. I wanted to tell the pastor/preacher that it was Byzantium before ..."

Every Church Needs a Joker (And ..."
"I can say here whatever I want to and let the chips fall where they ..."

Every Church Needs a Joker (And ..."
"An inner guidance mechanism that says “Do it even though you don’t want to and ..."

Every Church Needs a Joker (And ..."
"Yes, it was a painful “emancipation” because of my family’s heavy involvement in the denomination. ..."

Every Church Needs a Joker (And ..."

Browse Our Archives