Why the Mega-Church Model Isn’t Working

Why the Mega-Church Model Isn’t Working August 9, 2018

Why the Mega-Church Model Isn’t Working

In recent years several founders and leaders of evangelical, independent mega-churches have fallen off their celebrity-pastor pedestals hard. It’s happening again, right now, at perhaps the best-known and most influential of them all. As usual, I am not going to name names here. My interest is not at all in spreading gossip or even revealing factual information that might cause more pain to families (both biological and faith). Many of you will know what churches I’m talking about. Others can investigate the problem using an internet search engine. The most recent revelations and fallings out are being published in the New York Times.

I have never been a fan of independent mega-churches led by celebrity pastors not accountable to anyone outside their own organization. But these have become extremely popular in America in the past twenty-five years. All over the country they have popped up and people are flocking to them. They often offer great religious entertainment and a place to “hide” if all you want to do is attend church and never be asked to do anything.

Several of these independent mega-church’s celebrity pastors have fallen hard lately. They have been accused of being overly authoritarian, involved in sexual affairs outside of marriage, sexual harassment, and heresy.

*Sidebar: The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*

It is my considered opinion that power, celebrity, and unaccountability are dangerous to one’s spiritual and moral well-being. And that includes Christians. I’m never really surprised when an independent celebrity pastor or evangelist or other religious leader not accountable to anyone outside his or her own organization falls. I’m not suggesting it always happens. There have been many such independent celebrity pastors not accountable to anyone outside their own organization who have retired with an unstained record. However, it does seem that a surprising number of such men do fall and fall hard—and often take down lots of people with them.

I could right now name at least ten evangelical, independent mega-churches with very high profiles (nationally known) that have suffered this syndrome and some of them have simply closed their doors as a result.

What’s the solution? Well, obviously, accountability is part of it. No matter how high a pastor or other religious leader “flies,” he or she needs to function within an accountability network outside his or her own organization. I have seen first-hand what can happen when the only accountability is within the person’s own organization that he leads from up on a high pedestal.

The only solution is for people to stay away from churches led by people with no accountability to anyone outside their own church—especially if they are powerful, famous, and almost worshiped by their congregants.

This is why I like denominations. I’m not suggesting all denominations have the structure necessary to provide the kind of accountability needed. But the existence of a denomination provides more of a “covering” of accountability than does an absolutely free-standing, independent (“entrepreneurial”) church.

What about denominations that have no hierarchy? Almost all of them, though, have some leadership to which a congregant can go when the congregation becomes dysfunctional or the pastor is acting illegally or immorally. The leaders may not have direct authority over the pastor or congregation (some denominations are just loose affiliations of congregations without any authority outside the member congregations), but they can intervene on a personal level.

If I were looking for a church to join and I found one without any kind of accountability to anyone outside the congregation I would strongly suggest that the pastor, at least, be voluntarily accountable to someone who can step in, as it were, and intervene if a congregant has good reason to believe the pastor or other leaders of the congregation are acting immorally, illegally or in an overly authoritarian manner.

In fact, I’ve seen this work.

There’s no panacea for the problem I’m raising here; even a denomination can be corrupt.

Some years ago, however, this problem became so pervasive and serious that a group of evangelical organizations founded EFCA, the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability. I would not give money to any organization that did not belong to that or some similar accountability organization.

The underlying problem here is Americans’ obsession with celebrities, “bigness,” entertainment, and “success.” This obsession has obviously filtered into American religion and, sadly, even into American evangelical Christianity.

Some years ago when the “mega-church model” became widespread and more such independent mega-churches led by celebrity pastors popped up and evangelicals began flocking to them several well-known and influential evangelical theologians raised very strong objections to the trend and to the model itself. These objections appeared in the pages of influential evangelical publications, but, ultimately, they fell on deaf ears. The trend continued and grew and is now pervasive in American evangelical Christianity.

My suggestion is that people (and I’m talking primarily to evangelical Christians) be much more suspicious than they tend to be—about powerful, celebrity spiritual leaders who are not accountable to anyone but themselves and their handpicked boards (“yes men”).

*Note to commenters: This blog is not a discussion board; please respond with a question or comment only to me. If you do not share my evangelical Christian perspective (very broadly defined), feel free to ask a question for clarification, but know that this is not a space for debating incommensurate perspectives/worldviews. In any case, know that there is no guarantee that your question or comment will be posted by the moderator or answered by the writer. If you hope for your question or comment to appear here and be answered or responded to, make sure it is civil, respectful, and “on topic.” Do not comment if you have not read the entire post and do not misrepresent what it says. Keep any comment (including questions) to minimal length; do not post essays, sermons or testimonies here. Do not post links to internet sites here. This is a space for expressions of the blogger’s (or guest writers’) opinions and constructive dialogue among evangelical Christians (very broadly defined).

"I suspect that Patheos is concerned about possible law suits which is why I never ..."

Calvinism and Arminianism Compared by Roger ..."
"At the symposium someone mentioned Ford as Graham's true successor but admitted that he didn't ..."

Billy Graham as “Pope” of Evangelicalism
"I rarely meet anyone as pessimistic about contemporary American Christianity as I am. Yes, you ..."

Billy Graham as “Pope” of Evangelicalism
"I may have declined to post your reply IF (I don't remember) it was simply ..."

Again with “Good God” and Calvinism

Browse Our Archives



TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment