What If Universalism Were True? A Question for Evangelical Christians Especially

What If Universalism Were True? A Question for Evangelical Christians Especially September 20, 2019

What If Universalism Were True? A Question for Evangelical Christians Especially

Throughout Christian history some Christian theologians have believed that eventually everyone will be saved. That’s putting it simply, perhaps simplistically. There are many types of “universalism” among Christians throughout history. Let’s look at two main types.

First, there are those Christian theologians (and Christian non-theologians) who have believed and still believe today that there is no hell. By this I mean “hell” in any sense other than some kind of misery in this life—before bodily death. These Christians say hell is an empty threat; it does not exist. They may still speak of “hell” but they mean something like the misery a person experiences in this life caused by their (to use one phrase borrowed from theologian Friedrich Schleiermacher) lack of God-consciousness. This could be expressed differently, but the point is that “hell” is some consequence of sin in this life. After death everyone goes into “heaven” however “heaven” is understood (but not as anything like eternal torment or separation from God, etc.).

One can find this “no literal hell after death” belief in Christian history especially since the rise of modernity. Two examples are the first organized Unitarian churches in 1774 and the first organized Universalist churches in 1793. Both groups considered themselves fully Christian but without belief in hell. (The Unitarians also denied the doctrine of the Trinity.) These two organized groups of churches merged in 1961 to form the Unitarian Universalist Association which still exists. This is not to say there were no Christian universalists before these dates; it is only to give an example of an organized group of people (some) of who considered themselves Christians (all did in the beginning) who deny in the afterlife altogether.

Historical theologians love to debate whether and to what extent some ancient, early church fathers denied a literal hell after death and believed in universal salvation. Ancient Christian theologian Origen (184-253) is widely believed to have believed in universal salvation but it is unclear whether he believed in a literal hell through which wicked people pass after death before entering into heaven. Church father Gregory of Nyssa (335-394) seems to have believed in universal salvation. Again, it’s entirely possible that he believed in a literal hell but believed it is temporary. Exactly what these ancient church fathers believed about the afterlife is much debated, but common belief has it that they were both universalists and it is possible neither of them believed in a literal hell after death.

I find extremely interesting a group of Regular Baptists in the Appalachian Mountains (in the U.S.) called the “No-Hellers.” They are fundamentalist Baptists who deny the existence of hell. (See the book In the Hands of a Happy God: The No-Hellers of Central Appalachia (University of Tennessee Press).

*Sidebar: The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*

The second type of universalism among Christians is belief that a literal hell exists (but probably not “fire”) but is temporary. Nobody will spend forever there; eventually it will be emptied and all there will go into heaven. One notable example of this is German theologian Jürgen Moltmann (b. 1926). In several articles and books he has argued that hell is temporary and has affirmed eventual universal salvation. (And I have heard him speak on the subject.) I’m sure Moltmann is not the only universalist of this second type. Recently Eastern Orthodox theologian David Bentley Hart has published a book exploring universalism as a legitimate option (That All Shall Be Saved: Heaven, Hell and Universal Salvation (Yale University Press).

And yet “universal salvation” or apokatastasis is generally regarded as a heresy in Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic, and traditional Protestant circles. I do not embrace it myself except as a hope. But I do interpret “hell” along the lines of C. S. Lewis in The Great Divorce and other writings. Not so much as punishment but as escape from heaven. (Not literal “escape” as in leaving heaven but as preferring hell over heaven.)

A question I often ask my students (and others) is this: What if it were revealed to you in a way you could not doubt or deny that universalism (of either type) is true? What would be your response?

Most often I have heard one of two responses (or I have heard both from the same person). “I would be disappointed because some people deserve eternal torment in hell and I don’t believe it would be just for them to ever escape hell and go to heaven” and “I would be disappointed because I give up so much earthly pleasure in order to go to escape hell and go to heaven when I die.”

My common response to the first answer is that, according to the Bible and traditional Christianity, nobody deserves heaven and everyone deserves hell and it is only by God’s amazing grace that anyone goes to heaven. To think that someone deserves hell more than you do is an implicit misunderstanding of the depravity of humanity and of the nature of grace.

My common response to the second answer is that this reduces Christianity to drudgery and completely ignores the Bible’s promise of joy and peace in knowing Jesus Christ now, in this life. It is evidence (to me) that the person saying it has not really experienced communion with God through Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. This person (who says such) needs to come to Jesus; maybe he or she has never really been born again.

A third fairly common response is “Then I would not bother to share the gospel with anyone; I would disengage from witness.”

Again, this reveals a misunderstanding of what Christianity is really all about. It is about (among other things) “abundant life” here and now, not just after death. Even if everyone will be saved “in the end,” somehow, they are better (more at peace and joyful) here by knowing their Savior Jesus Christ and having the Holy Spirit living within them.

Universalism, even if it were true, should not really disturb a true Christian. In fact, I would argue that every true Christian should hope for it even if he or she cannot believe it due to lack of convincing biblical evidence (and even contrary biblical evidence).

*Note to commenters: This blog is not a discussion board; please respond with a question or comment only to me. If you do not share my evangelical Christian perspective (very broadly defined), feel free to ask a question for clarification, but know that this is not a space for debating incommensurate perspectives/worldviews. In any case, know that there is no guarantee that your question or comment will be posted by the moderator or answered by the writer. If you hope for your question or comment to appear here and be answered or responded to, make sure it is civil, respectful, and “on topic.” Do not comment if you have not read the entire post and do not misrepresent what it says. Keep any comment (including questions) to minimal length; do not post essays, sermons or testimonies here. Do not post links to internet sites here. This is a space for expressions of the blogger’s (or guest writers’) opinions and constructive dialogue among evangelical Christians (very broadly defined).

"You are talking about those who mistakenly replace traditional substitutionary atonement with Christus Victor atonement. ..."

Christ’s Atoning Death was NOT “Divine ..."
"Which is why I wrote “Thank God for Womanist Theology, But….” (The blog post previous ..."

Christ’s Atoning Death was NOT “Divine ..."
"True. Modern neo-paganism has reinvented European paganism to be “kinder and gentler.” They have invented ..."

Christ’s Atoning Death was NOT “Divine ..."
"One of the marks of good theology is being able to make subtle distinctions. Jesus ..."

Christ’s Atoning Death was NOT “Divine ..."

Browse Our Archives

Close Ad