Should Christian Colleges and Universities Use Nude Models in Art Classes?

Should Christian Colleges and Universities Use Nude Models in Art Classes? April 27, 2021

Should Christian Colleges and Universities Use Nude Models in Art Classes?

Should Church Leaders Ever Address a Woman about Modesty? -

This has been a lively discussion and debate within and around especially conservative Christian colleges and universities for a very long time. Recently a female student who majored in art in her undergraduate career complained that the university disallowed male nude models. She blamed that on the administration and “constituents.” I know the real reason—parents. The majority of students at all conservative Christian colleges and universities are female. It’s a higher majority than at secular or merely church-related colleges and universities. Why? Because parents are more concerned about their daughters’ collegiate experiences than their sons’. When I taught at a conservative, evangelical liberal arts college some female students told me they were only there because their parents told them they would pay for their education only if they attended a conservative Christian college. No male student ever said that.

Should conservative Christian colleges and universities use nude male or female models in drawing and painting classes? No. That is my simple, straightforward, controversial answer. And to those (especially young) people who object to my answer I will say “Wait until you have sons and/or daughters going off to college and then tell me….”

Yes, I know…most teenagers these days have seen images of naked people of the opposite sex. That doesn’t mean Christian institutions should use nude models. Two wrongs do not make a right. That’s like saying that most teens try alcohol so why ban alcohol from conservative Christian colleges and universities? Most do ban it—at least on campus. And that is right.

The argument I hear most often, especially from art teachers and students, is that if students do not gain experience in drawing and painting nudes they will not be accepted into graduate schools of art. I’m not sure I believe that. And even if that is true, does that mean we should drop our conservative Christian mores about modesty? I don’t think so.

*Sidebar: The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*

If we—conservative Christian colleges and universities (e.g., the member institutions of the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities)—allow nude modeling in art classes, why not allow nude swimming in the college or university pool? Why now allow nude sun bathing on campus? We don’t. We shouldn’t. Neither should be allow nude modeling just because the nudity is in a classroom or art studio.

Modesty in dress has always been a Christian moral norm. Some take it to extremes. When I was growing up in conservative evangelical Christianity boys, to say nothing of girls, were not allowed to wear shorts. We were not allowed to swim with girls at “church camp.” That was called “mixed bathing.” We shed those extremes during the 1960s, but then were faced with both boys and girls wearing “bikini” style swim wear in the 1970s. Some of those were extremely revealing.

While I don’t advocate returning to the 1950s in terms of conservative Christian beliefs and practices about modesty, I do think we need to hold onto some beliefs and practices that reflect the virtue of modesty—for both males and females.

I think the trend in contemporary Christian colleges and universities is toward the lowering of all traditional standards of living—especially in terms of dress and entertainment. Someone needs to put the brakes on that trend. I did my part when I taught in person (before the COVID pandemic) by asking my students to not wear shorts to class. I asked them not to wear hats in class. I asked them to dress for class as they would for church—unless their church’s expectation was semi-formal for Sunday worship. This was my response to some students wearing gym clothes to seminary classes. I ask them not to eat during class—even when class is “online.”

While “propriety” may not be a conservative Christian virtue, it is an academic virtue and has largely fallen by the wayside. It is also a virtue in worship and that is also falling by the wayside. I have visited numerous churches and in recent years it is common to see people get up from their seats in the worship space, go to the room where coffee and donuts are served, and return to the worship with coffee in one hand and a donut in the other hand—munching and sipping during worship. I do not think that is appropriate. Nor is reading and writing email on an ipad during worship—and I have seen that (close up) in some churches. Reverence in worship and propriety in classes are good practices that colleges and universities and churches have largely sacrificed on the altar of popular informality.

One reason I was glad to leave teaching undergraduates was that many of them simply assumed it was good and right to call me by my first name. Many of them expected me to entertain them in class—and said so. Many of them read things not related to the subject during class, rarely if ever looking up as I lectured or attempted to lead discussion. Many of them came to class late and/or left early without explanation or apology.

Modesty and propriety—both need to be remembered and emphasized in good measure, in moderation, without going to extremes.

No, I do not think conservative Christian colleges and universities should give in to pressure and use nude models in art classes—or allow young men or women to wear extremely revealing clothes on campus, let alone sun bathe nude or even partially nude.

I make no apology for being old-fashioned. I’ve always been old-fashioned. I was born old-fashioned. Someone needs to be old-fashioned.

*Note to commenters: This blog is not a discussion board; please respond with a question or comment only to me. If you do not share my evangelical Christian perspective (very broadly defined), feel free to ask a question for clarification, but know that this is not a space for debating incommensurate perspectives/worldviews. In any case, know that there is no guarantee that your question or comment will be posted by the moderator or answered by the writer. If you hope for your question or comment to appear here and be answered or responded to, make sure it is civil, respectful, and “on topic.” Do not comment if you have not read the entire post and do not misrepresent what it says. Keep any comment (including questions) to minimal length; do not post essays, sermons or testimonies here. Do not post links to internet sites here. This is a space for expressions of the blogger’s (or guest writers’) opinions and constructive dialogue among evangelical Christians (very broadly defined).

"No hyperlinks in comments here! Please. Read my rules. I can’t respond to all my ..."

A Model for Church Discipline
"I cannot allow names of specific institutions to be included in comments here. Please avoid ..."

What Is the Purpose of a ..."
"Emil Brunner was right—problems with possible conflict between a discipline and Christianity arise mostly in ..."

What Is the Purpose of a ..."
"Every congregation should be accountable in some way to a group/network/denomination of similar congregations."

A Model for Church Discipline

Browse Our Archives



error: Content is protected !!