2017-03-09T02:12:02-04:00

When Isabel Allende said in a brief NPR interview that her lat­est novel is a par­ody of crime fic­tion, and that she is not a fan of the genre, you would have thought she had just admit­ted to being a ser­ial killer. She did not say lit­er­ary fic­tion was bet­ter; she did not say those who like crime fic­tion are read­ers of low qual­ity; she did not say Stieg Lars­son fans should put down The Girl With the Dragon Tat­too and pick up The House of the Spir­its. But too many peo­ple seem to be sit­ting around wait­ing to be offended. Polit­i­cal cor­rect­ness is giv­ing us frag­ile ner­vous sys­tems, ready to shat­ter at the least gen­tle breeze. Say noth­ing more momen­tous than that you don’t like a par­tic­u­lar lit­er­ary genre, and those who do like it will break down in a fit of hys­te­ria. [Read more] Read more

2017-03-09T02:13:04-04:00

If you talk to Sim­cha Fisher, she will tell you that she did not write The Sinner’s Guide to Nat­ural Fam­ily Plan­ning to do what other dis­cus­sions of the sub­ject already do well. So you will not find moral or the­o­log­i­cal argu­ment; nor will you find a how-to man­ual for using this method of post­pon­ing pregnancy. “Priests are so thrilled,” she says, “to dis­cover that here finally is a cou­ple who wants to use NFP instead of con­tra­cep­tion, and there is sel­dom any dis­cus­sion of: Now what?” Read more

2017-03-09T15:58:19-04:00

I saw the acronym LGBTA today, on a job board for freelancers; an “LGBTA” mag­a­zine is hir­ing writ­ers. Thought I: What’s the A for? I had seen Q; but what was this new A in the alpha­bet soup of queer? I did the sen­si­ble thing and looked it up. It stands for asexual. I can not keep up. Insan­ity out­paces all sense and defies all rea­son. Where is the rea­son in think­ing of one­self as a species of starfish or sponge? And why leave out the Q’s? Do they have no place in this magazine? Shouldn’t it now be “LGBTQA?” Read more

2017-03-09T15:59:25-04:00

The agenda of the UN is to spread the idea that the Catholic Church is an evil to be fought. Unless the Church per­mits the mur­der of the unborn, it is not doing enough to stop the harm done to chil­dren. Unless the Church per­mits con­tra­cep­tion, it is not doing enough to ensure that chil­dren can live. And unless the Church says that men can stick their organs in places they were not designed to go, it is not doing enough to pro­mote the dig­nity of the human body. Read more

2018-03-04T18:54:20-04:00

Of Mark Binelli’s claim in Rolling Stoned — that the pope’s cri­tique of capitalism is the “most aston­ish­ing” aspect of his papacy thus far — not much need be said. Those famil­iar with Catholic social teach­ing will know that the Church advo­cates nei­ther Marx­ism nor cap­i­tal­ism, but the “third way” of dis­trib­utism. Leo XIII and his suc­ces­sors set forth the prin­ci­ples of it at great length and detail. Dis­trib­utism is a scan­dal to both right and left. Read more

2017-03-09T16:02:20-04:00

It is indeed a melancholy object, dear reader, to con­tem­plate the masses (we speak with no disregard for the Mass) whose breasts are thrilled by the annual event known as Super Bowl Sun­day. Imag­ine some­one will­ing to pay $30,000 in order to have a front-row seat at Mass. We believe that we have dis­cov­ered the way by which that may hap­pen, and not only increase atten­dance at Mass, and excite­ment about the Mass, but the rel­e­vance of the Mass too. Read more

2017-03-09T16:03:42-04:00

Of Pope Fran­cis, Mr. Binelli has this to say: “His rec­og­niz­able human­ity comes off as pos­i­tively rev­o­lu­tion­ary.” Yes. Now, I know this is going to be a dis­putable point, but here it is: That is quite pos­si­bly the dumb­est sen­tence writ by man. No pope before Fran­cis was human? What about that dour old crab Bene­dict? It is not human to be dour? Or what about the gre­gar­i­ous John Paul II? What does he mean, Fran­cis is rev­o­lu­tion­ary because he is human? Does that make sense? Read more

2017-03-09T16:04:46-04:00

In this post I am going to try a lit­tle blas­phemy. I won­der greatly how that will work out for me, in light of the reli­gious hys­te­ria that takes place every year on “Super Bowl Sun­day.” It is our nation’s holi­est day, when we gather round the altar; con­se­crate the ele­ments; and watch our priests beat each other up for an hour. And this we cheer and use as an excuse to get loud and smashed. I do not know why football has so seized this nation's need for religion. Read more

2017-03-09T16:06:28-04:00

By now, dear reader, you have prob­a­bly heard that Pope Fran­cis made the cover of still another pop cul­ture mag­a­zine. The arti­cle, which is long and boor­ish and blind, is bent to advance a stan­dard theme: that the new pope is a fuzzy and progressive-leaning mav­er­ick and will stand Church teach­ing on its head; whereas, the old pope, the evil Benedict, was a sour old man who beat us all over the pate with the ham­mer of dogma. That is a car­i­ca­ture and belies the facts. Read more

2017-03-09T16:08:02-04:00

Adam Pshaw is lecturing the pope on economics again. I am sur­prised Fox News would pub­lish such arro­gant snipe and present it as the work of some­one who “writes about Catholic issues.” No, sir. Fr. Z writes about Catholic issues. Mark Shea writes about Catholic issues. Pat Arch­bold writes about Catholic issues. Fr. Robert Sirico writes about Catholic issues. Did Fox News think to con­sult any of these esteemed men? Is Fox News unable to find informed and thoughtful sources? Read more


Browse Our Archives