NRA: Twenty Questions … with murder!

NRA: Twenty Questions … with murder! September 27, 2013

Nicolae: The Rise of Antichrist; pp. 190-194

Buck Williams is sailing up the Jordan River toward Galilee, which is a bit like sailing up the L.A. River to Glendale, but we’ve already covered that. Buck is praying for God to direct him to his friend, the ex-Rabbi Tsion Ben-Judah, when suddenly the boat’s engine stops and Buck is drifting in the dark. “Trouble, Michael?” he asks the riverboat captain he hired to take him up the river.

“No trouble, Mr. Katz. Until your eyes grow accustomed to the darkness, you’re not going to be able to see that I’ve got a high-powered weapon pointed at your head. I would like you to remain seated and answer a few questions.”

Ooh — action and adventure! Buck is face-to-face with a killer on the river — just like when Sideshow Bob had Bart Simpson trapped near Cape Feare!

Buck felt a strange calmness. This was too bizarre, too strange even for his weird life. “I mean you no harm, Michael,” he said. “You have nothing to fear from me.”

“I’m not the one who should be afraid just now, sir,” Michael said. “I have twice within the last 48 hours fired this weapon into the heads of people I’ve believed were enemies of God.”

This prompts a heated back-and-forth in which Buck and Michael take turns insisting that they are not enemies of God, but faithful servants, and challenging one another to prove it.

It doesn’t occur to either of them to ask what the other one means by saying someone is either an “enemy” or a “servant” of God. Nor does it occur to either of them to ask what you might think would be another pertinent follow-up question: “Which God are we talking about here, exactly?”

I suppose, though, that in the universe of these books, that question isn’t necessary. In the world according to Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins, there is only one God and everyone knows this, and so everyone who speaks of “God” can only mean one thing. Some few people in this world choose to be “servants” of this God, while everyone else chooses to be an enemy of God. Some of the enemies of God may pretend to be atheists or they may pretend to believe in some other God or Gods, but they’re not fooling LaHaye and Jenkins with such claims. The authors know that these enemies of God all really know the one, true truth, but then they willfully reject it so that they can indulge their sinful desires for sex, drugs and rock and roll.

That’s also why it doesn’t bother Buck that the man pointing a gun at him claims to have killed two people in the last two days because he believed they “were enemies of God.” Buck regards such killing as reasonable behavior toward God’s enemies. It doesn’t occur to him that this guy might be a serial killer dumping bodies in the river because his neighbor’s Labrador retriever told him that “God” wanted him to.

Michael tells Buck that the two people he killed were headed up the river “looking for someone I don’t want them to find”:

“Those were the wrong people looking for the wrong person. What I want from you is your real name, the name of the person you’re looking for, why you are looking for that person, and what you plan to do should you find that person.”

It’s your basic Holy Grail Bridge of Death scenario: “What is your name? What is your quest?” Answer wrong and you die.

“But Michael, until I’m sure you are on my side, I could never risk revealing that information.”

“Even to the point where you’d be willing to die to protect your friend.”

“I hope it doesn’t come to that, but yes.”

… “I am impressed with that answer,” Michael said.

And so we’re at an impasse in this little stand-off. Michael has no way of knowing whether Buck is another of the “wrong people looking for the wrong person” or if maybe he’s the right person looking for the — in that case — right person. And Buck can’t trust him enough to just say who he is and who he’s looking for without putting both himself and Tsion in danger from this killer riverboat captain.

Buck suggests they try to settle this with a game of Twenty Questions. All he says, actually, is “test me,” but to Michael, this suggests a game of Twenty Questions, and so they begin to play. At gunpoint:

“Excellent,” Michael said. “True or false: the person you are looking for is young.”

Buck responded quickly. “Compared to you, false.”

Michael keeps firing true-false questions at him until, after a full page of this, he’s established that the person Buck is looking for is an older Jewish male who is bigger than a breadbox and is educated but not a medical doctor. The answer to every one of Michael’s questions is “false,” so if this were an episode of What’s My Line?, Buck would have won $30 by now even though it seems Bennett Cerf is closing in on the solution.

Michael stepped forward and pressed the barrel of the weapon against Buck’s throat. Buck grimaced and shut his eyes. “The man you are looking for is a rabbi, Dr. Tsion Ben-Judah.” Buck did not respond.

There’s a tense moment, with the gun pressed against Buck’s neck, as it sinks in for both of them that this correct guess doesn’t actually solve the problem here.

“If you are seeking to kill him, and I was his compatriot, I would kill you,” Michael says. “If you were seeking to rescue him, and I represented his captors, I would kill you.”

Those are, indeed, two of the four possibilities here — the two that would result in Michael killing Buck. But rather than mention the two other possibilities, Buck decides to have theological discussion.

“But in the latter case,” Buck managed, “you would have been lying about serving God.”

“True enough. And what would happen to me then?”

“You might kill me, but you will ultimately lose.”

“And how do we know that?”

Buck had nothing to lose. “It’s all been foretold. God wins.”

By “God wins,” Buck means that God will ultimately kill all of God’s enemies really really hard, sparing only God’s servants — meaning those who know that the killing of God’s enemies has been foretold and is inevitable and who have, therefore, begged not to be killed.

When that’s what you think of as the “gospel,” then I think you’ve become one of the wrong people looking for the wrong person.

Michael, though, recognizes this fatalistic, bloody, vindictive gospel as the same message preached by his friend Tsion, so he says:

“If that’s true, and I turn out to be your brother, you can tell me your real name.” Buck hesitated. “If it turns out that I am your enemy,” Michael continued, “I’ll kill you anyway.”

Buck couldn’t argue with that. “My name is Cameron Williams. I am a friend of Dr. Ben-Judah.”

But Michael still isn’t quite satisfied. He has one final quiz question for Buck, and this one is fill-in-the-blanks:

“Quickly list for me six prophecies of Messiah that were fulfilled in Jesus Christ, according to the witnesses who preach at the Wailing Wall.”

Buck breathed a huge sigh of relief and smiled. “Michael, you are my brother in Christ. All the prophecies of the Messiah were fulfilled in Jesus Christ. I can tell you six that have to do with your culture alone. He would be a descendant of Abraham, a descendant of Isaac, a descendant of Jacob, from the tribe of Judah, heir to the throne of David, and born in Bethlehem.”

I can’t award Buck full credit for this. Michael demanded six fulfilled prophecies and Buck’s answer really boils down to only two. Any “heir to the throne of David,” must be from the tribe of Judah and must therefore also be a descendant of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, so really Buck is just trying to pad one answer out to make it sound like five.

It’s also about the least impressive, least meaningful “prophecy” imaginable. “Heir to the throne of David” sounds significant until you do the math. We don’t need the (conflicting) genealogies of the New Testament Gospels to know that Jesus of Nazareth could claim King David as an ancestor, all we need to know is that Jesus was born about 1,000 years after David. Jesus was descended from David, but in all likelihood so was every other Jew and nearly every Gentile living in Palestine at the time of Jesus’ birth.

That’s not a fulfillment of prophecy, it’s a fulfillment of arithmetic. I am a descendant of Charlemagne. And so are you.

We should note the weirdness of Buck’s claim that he’s selecting six prophecies “that have to do with your culture.” He’s talking about alleged prophecies of a Jewish Messiah — they all, by definition, have to do with Jewish culture. The whole point of this claim is that Jesus fulfilled prophecies listed in what the authors call the Old Testament.

That’s not necessarily really the case. Many of the “Old Testament” prophecies fulfilled in the New Testament accounts of Jesus actually seem to have originated in the New Testament. They involve some very creative reinterpretations and reimaginings of the earlier texts. This is a fascinating area of study — the creative, innovative use of the Old Testament by the writers of the New Testament. In some cases, this is profound and insightful — such as with the “suffering servant” passages in Isaiah. In other cases, though, it seems like either a confused misreading or, at best, an overly strained exegesis (see, for example, the way the Gospel of Matthew rewrites Hosea 11:1-5 to appropriate it as a prophecy about Jesus).

This process of interpretation and sometimes inventive reinterpretation is not what fascinates LaHaye and Jenkins, though. They’re obsessed with the idea of such “fulfillment of prophecy” because it reinforces their central claim about the Bible. For Tim LaHaye, the Bible is primarily a collection of coded predictions. Repeatedly asserting that this is what the Old Testament is “really” all about supports his assertion that this is also what the New Testament is “really” all about. He regards the former as a bundle of predictions about the coming of Christ and the latter as a bundle of predictions about the coming of the Antichrist (an event he seems to regard as far more exciting).

In any case, Michael is satisfied by Buck’s answer:

The weapon rattled as Michael lay it on the deck and reached to embrace Buck. He squeezed him with a huge bear hug and was laughing and weeping.

And so their impossible journey up the impassible river can continue at last.

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Lorehead

    Yes, but the terms Judea and Israel don’t refer to exactly the same area, either. Israel is no longer only the northern kingdom, nor do we today understand it to include the East Bank of the Jordan.

  • Well, as Fred, says, that kind negates two of the six prophecies, doesn’t it?

  • Dash1

    Actually, I take my comment back. It’s not equivalent to using the term “the Americas” before the 16th century, since “Palestine” has been in use as a name for the region (variously bordered) since at least the time of Herodotus (5th century B.C.E.). Wikipedia indicates it appears in Josephus as a regional term. So I’m not seeing any reason for claiming the name isn’t used until 1948.

  • J Neo Marvin

    Sort of like “the name of this album is ‘The Beatles’, but it’s called ‘The White Album’?”

  • Heh, reminds me of the time my neighbor starting talking up his favorite book to me: “Its amazing, you won’t believe how much sense it makes, it will TOTALLY CHANGE YOUR LIFE!” I got pretty psyched up, actually, until I asked what book it was.

    It was one I’d already read twice.

    Getting the Christian spiel is like that nowadays: “I’ve got an amazing solution to your problems, you won’t believe how well it works, it will TOTALLY CHANGE YOUR LIFE!”

    “Wow, what is it?!”


    “Oh, no thanks. Already tried that twice.”

    They never seem to believe that you already tried it and it just wasn’t your thing.

  • Victor

    (((“Test me Michael, test me as hard and as long as you like!”)))

    Daniel, after reading all of these comments, “I’M” impressed with the role that you’re on and you of all DNA, “I” mean people should/would have put an end to pup pets, “I” mean human animals thinking that “The Multiplication Game” goes as far back as ADAM and EVE. Don’t tell this little retardo Victor’s so called four per sent age of his father, mother, son and holy spirit cells but “The Darkness” owns everything and we gods, “I” mean the invisible angels who come from this darkness have managed to con, “I” mean convince these animal humans that Devil is only a word coming from darkness and let U>S (usual sinners) “I” mean gods say that for argument sake that this “Trinity” of “Father”, “Son” and “Holy Spirit” really existed at “ONE” “TIME” but don’t YA think that a $, “I” mean Buck would have made “IT” a LOT clear her, “I” mean a lot clearer by NOW? OK! “I” grant YA that these human animals are what they are butt, flesh, blood and bones and we must remember that these dark forces are invisible nut…. and….


    END YA SAY sinner vic? DON’T BE LIKE THAT NOW if you know what’s good for YA?

    Go Figure Friends? :)

    God Bless Peace

  • Matri

    In RPGs, this may just be a playbalance thing: if you give a class the
    high hp, high dps, high defenses AND range, no one will play the other

    Star Trek Online, the Escort-class line of ships. Highest DPS, highest defense, highest speed, highest maneuverability, second highest hp.

    The Cruiser-class line of ships. Lowest DPS, second lowest defense, lowest speed, lowest maneuverability, highest hp.

    The so-called “Lead Designer” says there aren’t any issues, that these are balanced.

  • Jamoche

    Chuck Norris isn’t a badass, he just plays one on TV.

    I know people who were on the tournament circuit with him – the first time he came to Texas, back when people still believed in brawn over skill, he lost badly. He came back with the “blitz punch” – forget about hard, just hit as fast and often as you can. One of them’s going to hit, and this is a “first hit is the only one that counts” scoring system.

  • Alix

    Fair enough. I’m generally of the mindset that names are usually political (some moreso than others, granted) and probably piss off someone anyway, and it’s really hard to find general terms for a region that has the kind of history Israel/Palestine does.

    I mean, using Israel or Judea’s not apolitical, either, and it erases all the non-Jewish peoples who’ve lived there – Philistines, Palestinians, Canaanites, etc.

  • Kirala

    The 10th Kingdom, in one sense, screwed up this test, because it presented something which is technically logically impossible to solve. In another sense, they did Haley proud:

  • Kirala

    This was our thought about jetskis when we were trying to ski behind our motorboat on the lake. Am still unconvinced that a modified paintball gun would be out of line.

  • VMink

    “I have twice within the last 48 hours fired this weapon into the heads of people I’ve believed were enemies of God.”

    How very… Christian… of him.


  • walden

    “Brother Michael” just murdered two “enemies of God” in the last two days …but that’s cause he’s just so faithful and such. No wonder Cameron is so relieved. Or as he says himself “God wins”…
    Wait….what kind of book is this?