Kavanaugh Accuser’s Longtime Friend Issues Statement (Case Closed?)

Kavanaugh Accuser’s Longtime Friend Issues Statement (Case Closed?) September 22, 2018

So let’s revisit the Brett Kavanaugh controversy.

I first mentioned Brett Kavanaugh on Thursday, as I discussed the poor handling of the controversy by Reverend Franklin Graham.

And what was the controversy?

I’m glad you asked.

Judge Kavanaugh has been nominated by President Trump to the Supreme Court. The question of his confirmation was a no-brainer. The majority Republicans in the Senate would hand him an easy up vote and in he would go.

For the political left, this was unbearable. That would be two Supreme Court seats in a year filled by Republicans. I’m not sure what they think is going to happen.

Yes, I do.

They’ve binge-watched “The Handmaid’s Tale” so much that they harbor these dystopian society fantasies, with Republicans as the oppressive baddies in their scenarios.

Calm down, ladies. You’re all equally wretched.

Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein sought to derail Kavanaugh’s confirmation by making the dramatic move of presenting a letter she’d been sitting on since July, allegedly, from a California professor by the name of Christine Blasey Ford.

It was a blatant act of partisan political hackery.

We all know by now the chaos that ensued.

Ford claimed to have been sexually victimized – terrified for her life, even – by a 17 year old Kavanaugh at a party in the 80s.

My problem with Reverend Graham’s comments is that he didn’t respond as a Christian leader to the situation. He responded in a way that could be painful to actual victims of sexual assault, by saying an alleged assault nearly 40 years ago was “irrelevant.”

That is an awful thing to say.

I also wanted to leave room for the possibility that this event happened just as Ford had claimed. In that event, I do feel it is possible for people who were awful kids to grow and mature into responsible, productive, decent human beings.

So what about the other possibility?

What if Professor Ford is nothing more than a political operative?

Well, I wasn’t there (and neither were you), so all we have to go on is Ford’s word, and the four witnesses she has said could vouch for her claims.

So about Ford’s word…

She’s changed details about the story, several times. Of that, I imagine you could give her a bit of leeway. It was back in the 80s, after all.

Given her shaky grasp of her own story facts, it’s a good thing she has four witnesses, right?

Yeah. About that…

So CNN is reporting on the Senate Judiciary Committee’s efforts to investigate Ford’s claims. The four witnesses named by Ford were Kavanaugh, himself, Mark Judge, Patrick J. (“PJ”) Smyth, and a longtime friend of Ford’s by the name of Leland Ingham Keyser.

Keyser, according to Ford, would have knowledge of the party and the assault.

Right off the bat, we know Kavanaugh has absolutely denied the incident ever happened.

What about the others?

“I have no memory of this alleged incident,” said Mark Judge in a September 18 letter sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee. He said he did not recall the party and never saw Brett Kavanaugh act in the matter Ford describes.

Ok. That’s two out of four down.

In addition, Patrick J. Smyth issued a statement. “I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Smyth said in his statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”

“Personally speaking, I have known Brett Kavanaugh since high school and I know him to be a person of great integrity, a great friend, and I have never witnessed any improper conduct by Brett Kavanaugh towards women. To safeguard my own privacy and anonymity, I respectfully request that the Committee accept this statement in response to any inquiry the Committee may have.”

Alright. Three out of four.

The simple solution to why nobody is willing to back up Ford’s story (including Ford, who keeps finding excuses not to tell her story to the Senate), is that as men, they’re part of the patriarchal rape culture.

Or something.

Yes. To get to the truth, you need a woman.

Enter Ford’s friend, Leland Ingham Keyser:

On Saturday night, her lawyer, Howard Walsh, released a statement to CNN and the Senate Judiciary Committee..

“Simply put,” Walsh said, “Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.”

The lawyer acknowledged to CNN that Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford’s.

Keyser is the latest person alleged to be at the party to say she has no recollection of it.


I mean, it really looks like Ford just threw an accusation grenade into the center of the confirmation process, feeling herself comfortably out of the way of the fallout.

She claims she’s getting death threats, and that’s unfortunate. It shouldn’t happen, even if it turns out her motives were purely deceitful and politically motivated.

For that matter, however, neither should Kavanaugh, or his wife, who has nothing to do with any of this (Yes, that’s a thing that’s happening, apparently).

I get it. The #MeToo movement has been an empowering event for women, but just as it is with any big movement, the opportunity is there to exploit the good purpose for really bad things.

I’ve seen some feminists claim that innocent men will have to be ruined for the “cause.”

I can’t even begin to express how disheartening this is, but it’s part of the modern feminist delusion.

If you’re a woman, you’re absolutely to be believed, and even if your details are cloudy, your evidence scant or nonexistent, and your own named witnesses act as if you’re on crack, no one is allowed to question you. The truth is flexible and dependent on your whims.

(Disclaimer: The above rule is only for liberal women or Democrat operatives. Conservative women may as well be men.)

If you’re a man, you are a rapist. If you haven’t raped anyone yet, you will. And no, nothing you say will ever be truth.

(Disclaimer: The above rule does not apply to homosexual men or women who think they are men.)

Add a healthy dose of partisan idiocy to that, and it’s hard to see how we continue forward as a society. At some point, we will break.

Ford has been offered numerous opportunities to come forward and be heard. The next opportunity was offered for next Thursday.

How this new development plays into that remains to be seen.



"Very nice.You know, I've considered it, and I love the notion of Boris Karloff narrating. ..."

How the War on Christmas Was ..."
"The Ukrainian government was cooperating with the Mueller investigation. Trump does an arms deal with ..."

Did Ivanka Trump Orchestrate Inflated Prices ..."
"The swamp just keeps getting deeper."

Did Ivanka Trump Orchestrate Inflated Prices ..."
"I'm sure I'll get hammered with comments but when it came to Trump vs. Hillary ..."

VIDEO: Trump Pouts, as Remaining Presidents ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • captcrisis

    Are you saying Ford’s therapist altered those notes from 2012?

  • RebeccaSusanWright

    Did Ford’s therapist notes name Kavanaugh?

  • Jim Bales

    Ms Wright,

    You write:

    For the political left, this was unbearable. That would be two Supreme Court seats in a year filled by Republicans,

    yet you never mention the name of Marrick Garland, who was, of course, nominated by President Obama, but Republican Senators would not allow his nomination to be voted on, and Republican Senators would not even meet with him.

    Would you say that, for the political right, is was unbearable that President Obama be able to fill the seat that opened with the death of Justice Scaia?


  • captcrisis

    As someone who used to counsel victims of sexual assault let me tell you, the therapist would not write the rapist’s name in her notes. She would probably not even ask Ford his name to begin with. At most it would say, “This man is now a highly placed individual.” I’ve written such a thing even when the victim knew perfectly well that I knew who he was.

    There would have been no point in putting the name in the notes. In the first place, if the client brings charges it would make the notes susceptible to a subpoena, something the client would object to if there was other material there that she wanted to keep private. (The notes are supposed to be privileged, but a judge might disagree.) Secondly, if the statute of limitations has passed there would be no point. It’s in the past, there’s nothing to be done, and the therapist’s task is help the victim put it behind her. This is in fact the task of most post-assault therapy, since most victims decide not to press charges even when charges are still possible.

  • Polarbearpapa

    Keep up the good work Susan…

    …Some times you just have to say…

    …Something about this fishcart is starting to stink….

  • Brian Orion

    In the era of Donald and Hillary there is no right and wrong, neither side has even the slightest iota of moral high ground. It’s all about partisan “gotchas”. We both know that if Merrick Garland were accused of this same thing Franklin Graham would be calling for his execution.

  • captcrisis

    If your aunt had balls . . . um . . . she’d be your uncle.

  • Cordyceps sapiens

    Now there is one other named accuser, and multiple witness accounts of an ongoing culture of normalized rape in Kavanaugh’s social circle. Mark Judge’s ex-girlfriend recounts him confessing to her of his old habit of participating in alcohol-assisted gang rapes. The FBI needs to investigate these allegations, now. If there is nothing to hide, the accused has nothing to fear from this investigation, nor do those working so hard to get his nomination approved.