Teen Magazine Glamorizes Anarchy

Teen Magazine Glamorizes Anarchy September 9, 2018

It’s time to send up another red flag on Teen Vogue, the magazine that targets young girls between the ages of 13 years old and 17 years old.

I remember a time when such magazines were about hair and fashion, maybe the occasional celebrity interview. Now, the content has become dark and subversive, meant to instill a certain worldview of humanism, completely detached from what was once held as moral and reasonable for our youth.

I would be remiss if I didn’t mention that if your children are getting the bulk of their ideology from magazines and peer pressure, someone is failing them. More time should be spent with parents who take on the task of seeing that their offspring are raised in a healthy, moral, socially conscious environment.

What Teen Vogue is doing is not that.

The editors and staff of the trash mag have apparently deemed it their purpose to create the next generation of reprobates.

I’ve written in the past about some of the articles featured in the magazine. Of those, there have been articles that give tips on cheering up your gal pal after her abortion, with neat, funky little “abortion gifts.”

There has even been an article instructing the best way to have anal sex.

In a Friday article, the magazine began it’s new phase of outrageous, with a tutorial on anarchy.

The piece, titled, “Anarchy: What It Is and Why Pop Culture Loves It,” was authored by Kim Kelly, an organizer with Metropolitan Anarchist Coordinating Council (MACC), based in New York City.

The article goes to talk in the kind of language that is probably going to be over the heads of 13 and 14 year old girls, but it really sounds like something cool and hip, youth-oriented, independent from parents, the oppressiveness of homework and rules, and totally lends to the belief that kids know more about the world than grownups.

Anarchism is a radical, revolutionary leftist political philosophy that advocates for the abolition of government, hierarchy, and all other unequal systems of power. It seeks to replace what its proponents view as inherently oppressive institutions — like a capitalist society or the prison industrial complex — with nonhierarchical, horizontal structures powered by voluntary associations between people. Anarchists organize around a key set of principles, including horizontalismmutual aid, autonomy, solidarity, direct action, and direct democracy, a form of democracy in which the people make decisions themselves via consensus (as opposed to representative democracy, of which the United States government is an example).

The emphasis there is mine, as I wanted to make note of the wording.

Can you see how that would appeal to the undeveloped thinking of a kid?

Most of the kids that would read that swill would be reading it from their homes, on computers or the cell phones, obtained for them through the “oppressive institution” of capitalism.

Indeed, the writer was probably not writing this piece from a cardboard box in an alley or the tree house in the rain forest that she built herself from recycled soda cans.

Kelly goes on to write about Karl Marx, the Paris Commune, 1871 Paris, where anarchists and their kissing cousins, communists, took over Paris for a short time.

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon is generally recognized as the first self-proclaimed anarchist, and his theories continue to influence anarchist thought today — if you’ve ever heard the phrase “property is theft,” that’s straight from Proudhon’s 1840 book What Is Property? But Proudhon was far from the only prominent thinker to advance the cause of anarchy. William Godwin’s 1793 treatise, An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice, is hailed as a classic of antistate, proto-anarchist thought. Other famous contributors to anarchism’s development include Peter KropotkinMikhail BakuninEmma GoldmanLucy ParsonsVoltairine De CleyreMax StirnerJohann MostBuenaventura Durruti, and Alexander Berkman. In addition to these names, countless others, whose identities have been lost to history, have helped refine and spread the ideology of anarchism. Today, anarchism is a fully global, intersectional philosophy, with particularly strong roots in Latin America, Spain, Germany, and, as of 2012, the Middle East, due to the 2012 Rojava Revolution in occupied Kurdistan.

Emphasis mine.

Don’t miss that, kids: If you own anything, it’s theft.

Such a dead-end train of thought, yet, I’ve never seen an anarchist protesting in the streets naked.

Clothes are property, the materials used for your signs are property, the homes you return to are property.

It’s like they want to be cool, but nothing about anarchism makes sense.

And they’re hypocrites.

Of course, if your tyke isn’t quite sure they want to jump straight into anarchism, there are so many different genres of the system to link to.

Classic anarchist traditions include mutualism, which is situated at the nexus of individual and collectivist thought; anarcho-communism, which favors community ownership of the means of production, and the abolishment of the state and capitalism; anarcho-syndicalism, which views unions, the working class, and the labor movement as potential forces for revolutionary change; and individualism, which has similarities with libertarianism, and emphasizes individual freedom above all. More recent, more post-modern schools of thought, including anarcha-feminismBlack anarchismqueer anarchismgreen or eco-anarchism, and anarcho-pacifism, have found firm footing in today’s anarchist communities.

Anarcho-capitalism, which is interested in self-ownership and free markets, is much rarer, and is considered by most anarchists to be illegitimate because of anarchism’s inherent opposition to capitalism.

The article further tries to draw a dividing line between anarchism and communism, but it’s weak sauce. Anarchy is an absolute tool of communists, meant to break down functioning capitalist societies through chaos and installing communism.

The piece notes all the pop culture references to anarchy, from the 70s punk scene to hip-hop artist Cardi B’s anarchy patch (the circle with the red “A” slashed inside).

Hey, look, kids! Everybody’s doing it!

But what is also tucked inside the piece is the real crux: an advertisement for the domestic terrorist organization, Antifa.

Since fascism is an antidemocratic ideology that thrives on oppression, and anarchism is explicitly against oppression in all forms, and for direct democracy, anarchism is inherently antifascist (much like all anarchists are by necessity anti-police and anti-prison). Not all antifascists are anarchists, but all anarchists are antifascist, and have been fighting against fascist forces for centuries. During the Spanish Civil War, most of the country was under anarchist control, and thousands of anarchists joined the International Brigades, a volunteer militia numbering in the thousands, who traveled to Spain to fight against General Francisco Franco and his fascist forces. It’s no coincidence that there are black flags waving in many photos of masked antifa, who have been very active in widely resisting what they view as oppressive policies across the U.S.

Thanks for the history lesson – and the whitewashing of what Antifa is.

The violent purpose of Antifa today is seen in disruptive protests that have broken out on college campuses across the nation, as the group seeks to shut down any speech they do not like.

In recent weeks, they’ve attacked police officers, journalists, and in one case, cracked open the head of a liberal protester who was basically on their side, but because he held up an American flag, he became a target. That attack from behind send the man to the hospital, where stiches were required.

They are criminals, subversive and reprobate. They are dangerous and the Department of Homeland Security deemed their activities [rightly] as domestic terrorism.

Kelly finishes off her Teen Vogue piece:

Anarchism and anarchists are everywhere, and hopefully now you’ve got a better understanding of what they’re fighting for — and against.

Nothing in her piece shows the violence or bloodshed.

Nothing shows the destroyed buildings or burning cars.

She didn’t mention a thing about their intimidation tactics or other criminal activities.

Nope. Nothing to see here but some crazy, idealistic kids, out to change the world, right?

Teen Vogue has become an insidious weapon of the left in the culture wars, and parents need to be on high alert about what media their kids are consuming.

None of this is ok.

 

 

 

 

 

"Pence is a pure and utter opportunist and everyone knows it. Trump may not be ..."

Trump Said to Be Questioning the ..."
"The point is, a woman would have to debase herself to accept the Vice Presidency ..."

Trump Said to Be Questioning the ..."
"I can see your viewpoint and consider it valid. As to Pence deserving his humiliation, ..."

Trump Said to Be Questioning the ..."
"I had never heard of Trump before his candidacy other than as a name of ..."

Disloyal: Trump Mocks His Top Sycophant ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics Red
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Marcion

    Most of the kids that would read that swill would be reading it from their homes, on computers or the cell phones, obtained for them through the “oppressive institution” of capitalism.

    Indeed, the writer was probably not writing this piece from a cardboard box in an alley or the tree house in the rain forest that she built herself from recycled soda cans.

    https://78.media.tumblr.com/2fda60300511206ad8e63df66848bc00/tumblr_odgkwxn99w1qh3h8wo1_1280.png

  • captcrisis

    You associate (actually almost free-associate) anarchism with causes it was in fact not associated with. For example, during the Spanish Civil War, people forming anarchist communities found themselves under seige from Communists as well as Fascists.

    Anarchism has bad things to say about establishment Christianity, for reasons that you probably understand. It has a good deal in common with early Christianity (at least before Paul got to it), for reasons that you might have forgotten.

  • Polarbearpapa

    This pretty much explains the reason they work on our nations children….

    “Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.”

    and..

    “Give us the child for 8 years and it will be a Bolshevik forever.”

    Vladimir Lenin

  • Re: “…which has similarities with libertarianism, and emphasizes individual freedom above all.”

    That should alarm sleeping conservatives.There are many factions from both the left and right who seek to subvert our founding principles, but libertarianism is the primary vehicle on the right being used to substitute republican principles with those of anarchists. Despite Libertarians/Voluntaryists rhetoric of being constitutionalists, and of the same blood as our revolutionary founders, they actually despise both and seek to either abolish it or secede from the Union. They have more in common with the Jacobins then they do with authentic American conservatism.

    Here is a part of an excerpt by libertarian Lew Rockwell from ‘Property, Freedom, and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe’,

    The Constitution was preceded by the Articles of Confederation, which Rothbard had variously described as near anarchist in effect. Who were these guys who cobbled together this Constitution? They were the leftovers from the war: military leaders, financiers, and other mucky mucks—a very different crew from the people who signed the Declaration of Independence. Jefferson was out of the country when the Constitution was passed. And what was the effect of the Constitution? To restrain government? No. It was precisely the opposite, just as Hoppe said.

    Like their leftist counterparts, Libertarians are notorious for revising history to fit their narrative. Because Thomas Jefferson was out of country during the drafting and ratification of the new constitution, Libertarians try to co-opt him as one of theirs. But truth be told, Thomas Jefferson did support the new Constitution. There were many who signed the Declaration who supported the new “cobbled” Constitution (e.g. John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, James Wilson, John Witherspoon, etc etc etc)

    Ever wonder how libertarians could support Donald Trump? It’s simply a means to an end as Libertarian writer Ilana Mercer explains in what she absurdly calls “The Positive Process of Trump”,

    The Constitution is a dead letter. In this post-constitutional jungle, the law of the jungle is what prevails. Do we get a benevolent authoritarian to veto Obama’s legacies, or do we continue to submit to Demopublican diktats? That’s the best we can hope for until the center falls apart and gives way to the process of secession.”

    The Constitution is only dead if law and liberty are dead in the hearts of the citizens. As George Washington firmly stated in his Farewell Address, the constitution which at any time exists til changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people is sacredly obligatory upon all. Yet libertarians foolishly believe they can establish their anarchist utopia upon its ruins.

    “Conservative” columnist Erick Rush has endorsed Mercer’s ill thinking in a article titled ‘CREATIVE DESTRUCTION,’ TRUMP, AND AMERICA’S BIG OPPORTUNITY’. And interestingly enough Mercer admits to borrowing the phrase “post-constitutional jungle” from Mark Levin, another political hack and so-called conservative who has been promoting a Constitutional Convention with subversive amendments that would fundamentally alter our Constitution.

    If Americans cannot once again unite under our founding principles to effect a reformation of our Union through elections, we will only continue sliding into a miserable state of absolute anarchy and tyranny, and liberty will be lost to us forever. God abhors lawlessness and does not grant liberty to a nation of people who have squandered it away.

  • “There is a natural and necessary progression from the extreme of anarchy to the extreme of tyranny; and that arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of Liberty abused to licentiousness.” ~ George Washington, Circular to the States (June 8, 1783)

    “It is impossible to read the history of the petty republics of Greece and Italy without feeling sensations of horror and disgust at the distractions with which they were continually agitated, and at the rapid succession of revolutions by which they were kept in a state of perpetual vibration between the extremes of tyranny and anarchy . . . great improvement . . . were either not known at all, or imperfectly known to the ancients.” ~Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Paper #9 (1787)

    “Before we can be distinguished by the same honours, we must be distinguished by the same virtues.

    What are those virtues? They are chiefly the same virtues, which we have already seen to be descriptive of the American character—the love of liberty, and the love of law. But law and liberty cannot rationally become the objects of our love, unless they first become the objects of our knowledge. The same course of study, properly directed, will lead us to the knowledge of both. Indeed, neither of them can be known, because neither of them can exist, without the other. Without liberty, law loses its nature and its name, and becomes oppression. Without law, liberty also loses its nature and its name, and becomes licentiousness.” ~James Wilson, Of the Study of Law in the United States (1790)

    ” I often wonder whether we do not rest our hopes too much upon constitutions, upon laws and upon courts. These are false hopes; believe me, these are false hopes. Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it. While it lies there it needs no constitution, no law, no court to save it. And what is this liberty which must lie in the hearts of men and women? It is not the ruthless, the unbridled will; it is not freedom to do as one likes. That is the denial of liberty, and leads straight to its overthrow. A society in which men recognize no check upon their freedom soon becomes a society where freedom is the possession of only a savage few; as we have learned to our sorrow.” ~Judge Learned Hand, The Spirit of Liberty (1944)

  • We are looking at the end of America.

    Not the end of the Church, of course, but the end of America.

  • Myles

    Religious freaks browbeat and brainwash their children, from birth, with “biblical truths”. Failure to believe that sick and immoral stupidity results in their being scared to death with threats of “eternal hellfire”.
    Proselytising, before victims are at least eighteen years old, being rendered illegal would result in the near extinction of religion in two or three generations.
    Pray for a ban.