So, what’s the big story?

Austin Bay is asking what were the big stories of ’05?

I agree with Hugh Hewitt, that the passing of John Paul II and the election of Benedict XVI is quite huge – two events unlike any of us have seen in our lifetimes – the long, seemingly endless watch, kept worldwide, as JP took his leave – and the election – both events bridged by a funeral that still brings chills.

But I also agree with Jack Kelly who, in Bay’s comments section, writes:
The most important stories are:
1. The progress of democracy in Iraq and Afghanistan
2. Able Danger
3. The willingness of the New York Times (and many others in the media) to jeopardize national security in an effort to embarrass President Bush. I don’t think even the Copperhead newspapers during the Civil War went as far as the Times has gone.

The New York Times is so far gone, so over-the-top that they are not listening even to those formerly considered by them to be highly credible – former Clinton defenders – apparently once they defend Bush, all bets are off. The Times (and to a lesser extent the WaPo) are holding their hands over their ears and down-shouting any opposition, “we’re pushing for impeachment and full speed ahead; don’t bother us with details or legalities!”

They are both huge stories; they will both have enormous repercussions in the coming years. I can’t help but notice, however, that the first story seemed to bring the world a sense of hope and calmness…the second seems to bring a sense of malevolence and calamity.

The third huge story, utterly underreported, but one that will also impact the world greatly: Iraq’s embrasure of democratic ideals.

Think for a moment: if Clinton had done it, they’d be suggesting we make him King. Or at the very least “President Forever.” But you know, Bush did it. Ho-hum, no story here.

We continue to live in interesting times.