Hello? Feminists? Sister being smarmed, here! Hello?

The sister is question is Condoleeza Rice of whom Pravda says:

“Condoleezza Rice released a coarse anti-Russian statement. This is because she is a single woman who has no children. She loses her reason because of her late single status. Nature takes it all.
…
“This is the only way to satisfy her needs of a female. She derives pleasure from it. If she has no man by her side at her age, he will never appear. Even if she had a whole selection of men to choose from she would stay single because her soul and heart have hardened. Like Napoleon, Genghis Khan, Tamerlane, or Alexander the Great of Macedon Ms. Rice needs to fight and release tough public statements in global scale. She needs to be on top of the world.
…
“Condoleezza Rice needs a company of soldiers. She needs to be taken to barracks where she would be satisfied. On the other hand, she can hardly be satisfied because of her age. This is a complex. She needs to return to her university and teach students there. She could also deal with psychological analysis.

Ace posted this on January 11.

We’ve been told by feminists that there exists a mythical “sisterhood” meant for the defense and support of “all women,” particularly when they’re being insulted, debased and chauvenized by men.

From the sisterhood we have heard no praise of Dr. Rice, and the silence from that quarter, in the face of these remarks, is deafening.

I guess Dr. Rice is the wrong sort of “sister.” Because “sisterhood” can’t be as empty and meaningless as all that, otherwise.

All of which tells me that the so-called “sisterhood of feminism” is phony, and so are the gals proclaiming it. It also tells me that Russia is insecure about and afraid of Dr. Rice, who is a scholar of that state and speaker of that language.

These are not bad things to know.