“Well, there are all manner of lesser imps and demons, Pete, but the
great Satan hisself is red and scaly with a bifurcated tail, and he
carries a hay fork.”
— Ulysses Everett McGill in “O Brother, Where Art Thou?”
Throughout the ages, classical depictions of Satan — a.k.a.
The Devil, The Evil One, Lucifer, The Morning Star, the Prince of
Darkness, Beelzebub, The Accuser, The Serpent — envision him as an
otherworldly dragonlike creature, often of a reddish hue with horns,
scales, hooves, bat wings and a pointy tail.
But it’s not always that way — and it probably shouldn’t be. Maybe
we need to see Satan for the invisible threat that he is.
In his 1942 satirical novel, “The Screwtape Letters,” renowned
author and Christian apologist C.S. Lewis casts Satan as Screwtape, a
meddling, scheming bureaucrat, the “Senior Tempter” and undersecretary
of his department (in the “Lowerarchy” of hell).
Lewis presents a series of 31 letters of correspondence between
Screwtape and his nephew, Wormwood, as the younger tempter tries to lure
his target (an average man in pre-World War II Britain known as “The
Patient”) away from God and toward damnation.
In the preface to “Screwtape,” Lewis bemoaned living in a world of
“Admin,” where “the greatest evil” isn’t necessarily confined to
Dickensian squalor or concentration camps or battlefields.
Rather, he wrote, evil is “conceived and ordered … in clean,
carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white
collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to
raise their voice. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for hell is
something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the offices of a
thoroughly nasty business concern.”
In his wickedly funny new book, “Devil’s Ink: Blog from the Basement
Office,” Elon University professor of religious studies Jeffrey C. Pugh
borrows a page from “Screwtape” but presents a thoroughly modern
Mephistopheles.
Rather than a series of correspondence — because, really, who
writes letters anymore? — Pugh reimagines the Devil as a blogger who
communicates his twisted point of view on humanity, God and the world to
his “colleagues” through dozens of blog posts.
Why a blog? Pugh’s Satan explains in the opening lines of his first
blog post titled, “Pleased to Meet You, Hope You Guessed My Name”:
“You may wonder why I am starting a blog. The fact is, my
colleagues, we must be flexible and innovative or we risk losing
influence, and if there is one thing that I fear, it is losing
influence.”
Pugh’s Satan anticipated readers’ questions about why his Satan
chose to embrace a blog rather than another social media platform.
“I debated whether to start a Facebook page, but there are so many
who are doing the heavy lifting for us there it would be merely
redundant,” Pugh’s protagonist writes. “I am also thinking of a Twitter
account, but am still trying to figure out what the point is.”
Like any good blogger, Pugh’s Devil arranges his dispatches by
topic, complete with “tags” at the bottom of each post. He mixes it up a
bit in terms of form and content, weaving clever pop culture references
with music (did you catch that Rolling Stones reference earlier?),
television, movies and celebrity throughout.
Some of the fictional blog posts are short, others rather lengthy,
and the subject matter varies wildly: Desire. Grace (which the Devil
calls “unseemly and obnoxious”). The Book of Job. Gitmo. Terrorism. The
politicizing of the church. Theodicy. Rationalism. And the Amish (who
apparently make Satan terribly nervous.)
The blogger’s tone is consistently sarcastic and often caustic (he
refers to his colleagues as “Duh-sciples”), but what would you expect
from The Prince of Darkness?
In one of the funniest posts, “I’m Going to Disney World,” the Devil
explains why the happiest place on Earth serves his purposes more
elegantly than the infamous Las Vegas Strip:
“I love Disney World. No, seriously, it is one of my most enjoyable
places on the planet,” he writes. “It has given them so, so much:
illusions, fantasy, Britney Spears. One small thing I have always
enjoyed about it is the nuance and deception on display. Take Vegas, for
instance. There we don’t have to concern ourselves with working hard.
… But Disney World is even better because we can still fleece the
rubes, but this time we use their most precious possession to do it,
their children.”
Pugh is wonderfully clever and bold in his critique of church
culture. The book is not a meditation on personal holiness and sin but
rather “an exploration of the ways that evil embeds itself structurally
in human life,” particularly through the seemingly frivolous (and
not-so-frivolous) avenue of popular culture.
(Pugh has continued Satan’s fictiious blogging adventure at Devil’s Ink Blog.)
“Though our methods are timeless, we also have learned through the
ages to use those fleeting and transitory things that humans have
created to help us reach our goals,” Pugh’s blogger writes. “One must
change with the times or risk being irrelevant, and if there is one
thing I am not prepared to be at this time it is ignored.”
Perhaps church leaders who read “Devil’s Ink” will be chastened to
rethink their passion to remain “relevant.”
The post originally appeared via Religion News Service.