
William Shakespeare once described envy as “the green-eyed monster which doth mock the meat it feeds on.” The image remains powerful because envy rarely harms only its target. It consumes the soul that nourishes it, turning admiration into resentment and gratitude into bitterness.
Do you ever feel that life dealt you an unfair hand while those who deserve less seem to receive more? Life offers no guarantees. God “makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust” (Matthew 5:45). Do you resent those who possess more than you—the rich, the successful, the admired, or the happy? If so, you have encountered one of Christianity’s most dangerous deadly sins: envy.
Envy exerts a powerful pull on the human heart, and politicians often exploit that temptation to gain and maintain power. Progressive movements in particular frequently frame resentment toward wealth, hierarchy, and success as moral virtue. Consider the now-famous slogan “Tax the Rich,” which Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wore to the lavish Met Gala in 2021, or her recent claim on a podcast that “You can’t earn a billion dollars.”
Now, greed—another deadly sin—can certainly corrupt the soul through exploitation, avarice, and indifference toward the poor. Christianity has always condemned those sins. But modern progressivism increasingly treats extraordinary success itself as morally suspect. The issue no longer centers merely on whether someone acquired wealth unjustly, but whether anyone should possess such wealth, status, or distinction at all.
That shift matters because envy rarely presents itself honestly. Unlike lust or greed, envy disguises itself as compassion, fairness, justice, or social consciousness. Yet Christianity classifies envy among the deadly sins precisely because it corrodes the soul’s ability to rejoice in the good possessed by another. A civilization shaped by envy eventually ceases to admire excellence and instead seeks to level it.
Cain and Abel: Envy and the First Murder
Most people know the biblical story of Cain and Abel. Cain murders his brother after God looks more favorably upon Abel’s sacrifice. Yet many overlook the central role envy plays in the story. The first murder in Scripture does not arise from lust, greed, conquest, revenge, or nationalism. Cain envies Abel, and that envy drives him to murder.
God even warns Cain about the danger of envy:
If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door. Its desire is for you, and you must rule over it. (Genesis 4:7).
Notice the pattern envy follows. It begins internally, festers through comparison, grows through resentment, and eventually seeks the destruction of the rival. Cain becomes consumed by the very resentment he nourishes. In the words of William Shakespeare, he becomes “the green-eyed monster which doth mock the meat it feeds on.”
Cain could have repented, improved, learned, or imitated Abel. Instead, he chose resentment. He did not merely hate Abel; he hated the favor Abel received.
The story of Cain and Abel reveals the destructive logic of envy. Rather than inspiring self-improvement or emulation, envy seeks to level, diminish, or destroy whatever rises above it. That same temptation continues to shape cultures, institutions, and political movements that frame resentment toward excellence, success, hierarchy, or distinction as fairness and justice.
Why Envy Is the Most Dangerous Deadly Sin
Thomas Aquinas defined envy as “sorrow at another’s good because it is another’s.” That definition reveals the crucial distinction between justice and envy. Justice asks, “Was wrong committed?” Envy asks, “Why should they possess this at all?”
The same distinction separates greed from envy. Greed says, “I want what you have.” Envy says, “You should not have it.”
Envy stands among the most dangerous deadly sins because it gives birth to so many others. Cain’s resentment toward Abel eventually culminated in murder. Resentment toward another’s wealth can fuel greed, wrath, or revolutionary anger toward “the system” that produced it. Envy rarely remains contained within the soul. It expands, festers, and seeks expression.
Though envy often appears rooted in insecurity, it remains profoundly self-centered and prideful. It asks:
- Why not me?
- Why should they possess authority?
- Why should their standards bind me?
- Why should they receive admiration, success, or distinction?
From that poisonous combination of envy and pride emerge:
- grievance,
- narcissism,
- resentment,
- and moral rage.
Envy cannot rejoice in the good possessed by another. Instead, it resents beauty, holiness, excellence, authority, success, and distinction itself. The envious soul does not merely desire to rise; it increasingly desires to pull others down.
Envy vs. Emulation
As with Cain, God warns us about the danger of envy and shows us how to overcome it. He tells Cain:
If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door. (Genesis 4:7).
God directs Cain’s attention toward self-improvement rather than resentment. If we focus on doing well instead of obsessing over another person’s success, we deny envy the opportunity to take root in the soul. Envy festers through comparison and resentment, while emulation grows through discipline, aspiration, and hope.
Moreover, envy grows from resentment and insecurity, while emulation grows from confidence and hope for the future. Envy asks, “Why should they possess what I lack?” Emulation asks, “How can I rise toward what is good?”
In this sense, Christianity stands as a religion of emulation. Paul the Apostle writes in 1 Corinthians 11:1:
Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ.
From that exhortation arose a Christian civilization that cultivated saints, heroes, martyrs, scholars, and holy exemplars. Christianity calls men upward toward holiness through imitation, discipline, sacrifice, and aspiration.
Envy, however, cannot tolerate exemplars because exemplars imply:
- standards,
- hierarchy,
- virtue,
- excellence,
- and aspiration.
The envious soul does not want to imitate what stands above it. It wants to diminish it.
Final Thoughts… Two Paths: Admiration or Resentment?
A healthy civilization cannot long survive once it allows envy through its door. For a civilization to flourish, it must cultivate admiration, gratitude, aspiration, reverence, emulation, and excellence. In other words, a healthy civilization teaches its citizens to rejoice in the good possessed by another.
Such a civilization encourages men to imitate what is noble rather than resent it for existing. It honors saints, heroes, scholars, builders, inventors, and holy exemplars because their excellence calls others upward. Healthy societies understand that admiration inspires aspiration, and aspiration produces greatness.
Conversely, unhealthy civilizations cannot long endure when resentment replaces admiration. Envy breeds suspicion, and suspicion soon gives way to hostility. The envious soul no longer asks, “How can I rise toward what is good?” but instead asks, “Why should anyone stand above me at all?”
Once a culture adopts that mindset, it begins to resent:
- excellence as elitism,
- authority as oppression,
- holiness as judgment,
- hierarchy as injustice,
- and success as exploitation.
The problem no longer becomes merely corruption or abuse, but distinction itself.
That is why envy proves so spiritually and culturally destructive. Envy cannot rejoice in beauty, holiness, excellence, or greatness because their very existence reminds the envious person of what he lacks. Rather than imitate what rises above him, he seeks to level it, diminish it, or tear it down altogether.
Cain faced the same choice every civilization ultimately faces: emulate what is good or resent it for existing. He chose resentment, and resentment ended in bloodshed.
Modern society increasingly encourages that same temptation. It teaches people to interpret inequality primarily through grievance, to regard superiority with suspicion, and to mistake resentment for justice. Yet civilizations do not flourish by cultivating grievance. They flourish by cultivating virtue.
Christianity offers a radically different vision. It calls men not to resent greatness, but to pursue holiness. It teaches gratitude instead of grievance, admiration instead of resentment, and emulation instead of envy.
What happens to a civilization when it no longer seeks to imitate what is noble, holy, and excellent, but instead resents those things for existing?
Thank you!
Read The Latin Right’s other writing here.
Please visit my Facebook page and IM your questions (and follow my page) or topics for articles you would like covered.









