Evangelical Christianity and Low Social Status: A Few Reflections

Evangelical Christianity and Low Social Status: A Few Reflections March 26, 2018
Many people were sad to read about the low social status of traditional Christian belief. Image via Pixabay.

This post proved to be more popular than I expected. As of this writing, it has been shared almost a thousand times and read many more times than that. The number and variety of responses have been overwhelming.

Responses ranged from predictable atheistic ideologues complaining about Christians talking to our skyfriend to equally knee-jerk reactions from fundamentalists insisting we only need to double-down on preaching the true gospel.

The most bizarre criticism of my piece came from people who faulted it for not being an exhaustive, academic treatment of the topic. The post is 867 words long. Complaining that I did not comment in it on every conceivably related topic is just strange.

Many commenters seemed to think I was just reasserting the idea that “elites don’t like Christianity.” I was not. I was pointing out that evangelicalism has poured a tremendous number of resources into “engaging the culture”, a project that has failed because the architects of those plans proceeded on a flawed anthropology.

Evangelical efforts to “engage the culture” proceeded without taking into account the reality of social dynamics. They proceeded as if most people chiefly adopt their identities and beliefs from some source other than their social group. They failed to see that most people are unwilling to associate themselves with traditional Christian belief when doing so puts at risk their social status and the privileges attached to it.

A couple of interesting comments came through suggesting that Christianity has been removed as the foundation of our culture because it is contrary to modern science. This is a complicated subject that has been adequately addressed in other places by people more qualified than I. Suffice it to say that people who argue this seem not to understand Christianity well. Certainly, they seem unfamiliar with much of the writing on Christianity and science that has been produced in the last couple of decades.

I will also point out that much of what we call “science” also benefits from the human tendency to adopt our beliefs based on what is socially acceptable. To act as if “science” is a human project altogether immune to the most basic human social realities seems to me naive at best.

Other responses carried a different message. These were of the “my uncle Bob went to church and he was a real jerk” sort. I do not mean to make light of these. Comments like these reveal a real pain and need to be addressed in ways I can not do here now. But, the fact that some people bring up negative experiences they’ve had with others who identified as Christians in the comments section of a blog post that has nothing to do with that topic shows how strongly they’ve been affected. Perhaps I will return to this theme at another time.

The off-topic nature of most of the comments here has caused me to consider turning off comments on this blog altogether.  I haven’t decided to do that, but I will certainly be curating them closely going forward.

Perhaps the most thoughtful response I’ve seen came from the blogger at Screen to Screed.

From his post:

Abbott breaks from the conventional wisdom that blames hypocrisy and political contamination of Christianity for its decline. It is not character deficiency but low social status that is handicapping Christian engagement efforts.

This observation rings true for me. I’ve long wondered why Christians are so willing to cede the moral and cultural high ground to their opponents. When you start to think of Christians as the low-status dorks of the American high school, that default position of surrender starts to make intuitive sense. When you’re a teenager, no one needs to tell you that the hottie or the stud are on one tier, and that the metal-mouthed stickboy or pizza-faced shy girl are on another. You see it and sense it and adapt accordingly.

Humans are inherently hierarchical. We are constantly assessing our place in every social hierarchy. As a general rule, we even measure our happiness in terms of hierarchy. When you’re working from the bottom of the sociocultural totem pole, then it doesn’t matter how winsome is your messaging or how skinny is your pant leg – you are always going to be an interloper when you try to engage with anyone above you.

This is the crux of my point. If evangelicals want to engage the culture around them, they must realize the reality of social dynamics and respond accordingly. That means many things, but certainly it means evangelicals need to recognize the reality of their situation and respond accordingly.

I will pursue these ideas in greater depth in future posts.

"Alternate title:"In case you needed another reason to stop eating fast food.""

You Are Only A Unit of ..."
"Bravo to you. I gave up mainstream media 10 years ago (tomorrow, as a matter ..."

Why I Deleted My USA Today ..."
"Yes, there is hardly a lesson to be found in most children's shows now. I ..."

Modern Children’s Entertainment is Terrible
"I think that most, if not all of the 600 or so Mosaic laws were ..."

The Royal Wedding and the Wrong ..."

Browse Our Archives



TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Salvatore Anthony Luiso

    Regarding “I’ve long wondered why Christians are so willing to cede the moral and cultural high ground to their opponents”: What does this mean? Where have Christians done this?

    It is common for American evangelicals to denounce contemporary American popular culture as deeply immoral–which it is. They wouldn’t do this if they didn’t believe they are on a moral and cultural ground than that of popular culture, would they?

    I was not “sad to read about the low social status of traditional Christian belief” in the previous two articles–I was not convinced by what I read about it in them.

    I wouldn’t want someone to become a Christian because he thought that he could attain a higher social status through conversion. To become a Christian means to follow and worship this man:

    He was despised and rejected by men,
    a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief;
    and as one from whom men hide their faces
    he was despised, and we esteemed him not.

    –Isaiah 53:3 (ESV)

    It means to follow and worship his man:

    But I am a worm and not a man,
    scorned by mankind and despised by the people.

    All who see me mock me;
    they make mouths at me; they wag their heads;

    “He trusts in the LORD; let him deliver him;
    let him rescue him, for he delights in him!”

    –Psalm 22:6-8 (ESV)

  • jekylldoc

    I’m all for good anthropology as a guide. And yes, “engaging the culture” with the idea that our Christian beliefs just needed to be packaged properly and they would be irresistible is an idea straight out of the advice in The Graduate: “Plastics.”

    I have always loved the Evangelical brothers and sisters who recognize that we are “beggars who have found bread.” Humility becomes the followers of the crucified Messiah. When evangelicals presume to judge their brothers and sisters, they invite closer scrutiny. That’s what a claim of superiority leads to. And guess what? Those who scrutinize find human beings, warts and all, and not magically transformed superior humans that any sane person would long to be like.

    I’d rather have Jesus than houses or lands. I’d rather be led by his nail-scarred hands.