The 68th Grammy Awards brought glimmer and bright lights to the music industry. A highly anticipated evening, this year’s awards ceremony was no exception.
For the Christian/Gospel music community, this evening is of particular excitement. This is a rare moment when the secular artistic community sees the scope and work of the contemporary Christian/Gospel music community. Framing a relevant and accurate representation of the Christian/Gospel music genre for a non-faith-based audience is important. It is incumbent on the nominees, winners, and those invested in the Christian/Gospel music industry to hold themselves in accordance with a Christian/faith-based ethic and promote the important value of this practice.
“Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord” (Ephesians 5:19 NKJV).
An isolated moment where the possibility of evangelism finds a dynamic, expressive inclusion. No pressure, but the eyes of the world, both secular and sacred, are watching. What is equally important is the reporting and documentation of the outcome for the Christian/Gospel music Grammy Awards. The published language around this glitzy evening will remain long after the names and sounds of the nominees and winners are forgotten. No pressure, but the eyes of the world, both secular and sacred, are reading — carefully.
A Case Study On Christian/Gospel Music Narrative
Jubilee Cast, serving as a case study about contemporary Christian/Gospel music authorship, speaks to interesting points and counterpoints for the genre. The published review by Jubilee Cast was an interesting commentary on the 2026, 68th Grammy Awards. The comments produce a review working along a segregational imprint that continues to be assumed in Christian/Gospel music.
GRAMMYS 2026 Winners for Christian & Gospel Categories — And What We Think of Them, Feb. 1, 2026.
“The 68th Annual GRAMMY Awards took place today in Los Angeles, gathering the global music industry for a night honoring excellence across genres. Hosted by Trevor Noah, the ceremony drew top artists, executives, and creatives from around the world, with pop, hip-hop, country, and classical music sharing the spotlight alongside faith-driven artistry. Gospel and Christian music were once again prominently represented, with artists including CeCe Winans, Kirk Franklin, Tasha Cobbs Leonard, Brandon Lake, Israel & New Breed, and The Brooklyn Tabernacle Choir reflecting the enduring impact of sacred music on one of the world’s most influential stages. Against this backdrop, the GRAMMYs delivered a set of Christian and Gospel wins that emphasized spiritual depth, artistic maturity, and lasting congregational influence” (Jubilee Cast, Feb. 1, 2026).
Already, there is a problem with this introduction. First, the news report presents a subtextual divide between the music categories and genres. Why is this problematic? An expressive community founded on producing scripture, biblically and spiritually-centered work, the importance of complete inclusion is necessary.
Granted, the Grammys work within compartmentalized categories the organization has established, presumably based on public interest. The categories, rather, are more framed around the popularity of market sales interest. Following this point, the “winners” in these categories comply with the recording industry sensibility (read: record sales and market interest). The voice of the public is outside of the ranking and decision-making process. This is, rather, a fantastical assumption and nice advertising narrative which helps secure television public visibility, which, then, equates to monetary gains for advertisers.
Following this reality, the “winners” can be claimed based on how many calculated viewers will watch to see/hear their favorite artist be held in acclaim, presumably from an unbiased organization of recording artists and industry professionals, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA).
The Recording Academy provides the following information on the selection/nomination, voting, and awarding in each category (Field).
“The process begins with members and record companies submitting entries, which are then screened for eligibility and category placement. The Academy’s voting members, all involved in the creative and technical processes of recording, then participate in (1) the nominating process that determines the five finalists in each category; and (2) the final voting process, which determines the GRAMMY winners.
“Reviewing sessions by more than 350 experts in various Fields are held to ensure that entered recordings meet specific qualifications and have been placed in appropriate Fields such as Jazz, Traditional Pop, Contemporary Instrumental & Musical Theater, and Latin, Global, Reggae & New Age, Ambient, or Chant, among others. The purpose of screenings is not to make artistic or technical judgments about the recordings, but rather to make sure that each entry is eligible and placed in its proper category.
“After nominations have been determined and announced, Academy voting members vote in up to ten categories across up to three Fields in the genre Fields, plus the four categories of the General Field, to determine the winners. To ensure the quality of voting, members are directed to vote only in those Fields in which they are peers of the nominees.
“Ballots are tabulated by the independent accounting firm Deloitte & Touche LLP. After vote tabulation, GRAMMY winners are announced at the GRAMMY Awards Premiere and telecast ceremonies. The recording with the most votes in a category wins. Ties are possible, in which case the two (or more) nominees who tie are considered winners. Winners receive a GRAMMY Award; All nominees receive a Nominee Medallion and Certificate” (Grammys, Award Process, 2026).
On the surface, this information published by the Grammys appears clear. The complication comes with the invested special interest (“peers of the nominees”), and subtextual market interest (“members and record companies submitting entries”). Blind reviews are important. Yet, these “voting members,” regardless of position in the recording industry, are not blind. There remains an opaque level of special interest throughout the nomination, voting, and awarding process.
Public viewers see their favorite artist, song, movie theme, etc., getting the credit they, the non-voting public, believe it deserves. The awardee gets the accolades they pridefully desire, along with subsequent privileges and bonuses that will resonate from their recording company, merchandise sales, and supported high tour date ticket sales, which is, now, where many touring artists/bands make the abundance of their income. Finally, the recording industry companies and professionals receive financial gains, immediately in the short term, with potential for the long term. If the money is followed, the awarding process becomes more overall bogus.
The second point, transparently stated in the introduction from the Jubilee Cast, is the names of those whom the journal positions as the forerunners, voice, and faces of Christian/Gospel music. Granted, those listed are the winners of the 68th Grammy Awards for Christian/Gospel music. Yet, the way these artists and ensembles are situated leads the reader to understand that this collective is the establishment of Christian/Gospel music. From the RIAA/Grammys, this is accurate. From a critical theomusicological perspective, this is biased, articulating a segregational ideology in the Christian/Gospel music industry.
Roots: A Division
Gospel music comes by way of the slave trade, embedded in the Southern United States, the “Cotton Belt.” Field hollers generated work songs, framed with a call-response organization, that gave birth to the Blues. The Blues, during the limited, available times of worship, gave way decades later to the Black Church and the Preacher songster. This style was later codified and marketed as “Gospel” music, noting the inclusion of Christian narratives in the orations. The signifying (“signifyin’”) of the Christian narratives was around the double-entendre of bible stories, slaves used to retain their culture while transposing their African roots into a new expressive genre coming out of the oppressive compression of the deep American South, the slave trade, and Christianity. Gospel became synonymous with the Black Church.
White audiences were intrigued by the Black performer well before the inception of Gospel music. Country musicians used the slave expressive vernacular (i.e., field hollers, call-response) and copied these as best they could, while transposing these expressive agents into their own musical vernacular; country music/hillbilly music. This new expressive genre comes from a possessive accumulation of slave musical discourse, converting these through a posture to establish artistic ownership, without the inclusion of Christianity.
In the earliest evolution of country music, which is the forefather to Christian music, there is no Christian narrative. This is added later, following the establishment of the Black church musical identity, where white performers sought to further stake claim to this musical representation, recognizing the foundation of Christianity in the Black church musical profile. Country artists began to replicate this process, the inclusion of Christian narratives in their work, yielding a white Christian musical genre or “Christian music,” eventually becoming what is categorized now as “Contemporary Christian” music.
The parallel streams of black-white musical lines eventually give way to the American popular interest in (white) Christian music, with (black) Gospel music being a quarantined genre, yet popular with American audiences. Control of the representation of “Christian” music comes by way of an invested possessiveness of whiteness (George Lipsitz, 1998) over Black musical expression as the ongoing artistic colonialism of the American pop cultural psychology.
While Gospel continued to grow in the Black communities, with visible and invisible interest and fascination by the American pop music audience, Christian music began to grow in interest and was assumed to be the dominant musical genre for a conservative American listening audience. Both grew in popularity, with the (white) Christian musical profile claiming the most prominent, coming through and fortifying artistic colonialism. In the present, 2025–2026, the recording industry’s financial value, both genres can be entertained, as each produces monetary gains. Pitting these against each other further stimulates a deeply rooted segregational tinge in America’s listening corpus. The money entices the segregational nerve through awarding “winners” from both the Black and White listening history. Added to this is the boasting credibility coming with the award, a principle that works counter to biblical teaching on boasting.
“Not of works, lest any man should boast” (Ephesians 2:9 NKJV).
“As it is, you boast in your arrogant schemes. All such boasting is evil” (James 4:16–17 NKJV).
When Theomusicology Is Absent
The review by Jubilee Cast was selected due to the language it presents, which is consistent across multiple Christian reviews of the Grammy Christian/Gospel Awards. This is to say, the views expressed work largely to support a glamorized popular opinion of contemporary Christian/Gospel music, rather than in alignment with the founding and extended principles of theomusicology (personal testimony, discipleship, evangelism, bible-centered text/lyrics, community, and activism). The survey of most faith-based literature about the Grammy Awards falls victim to a position of boasting about the inclusion of this genre in the public sphere. Though important, neglecting to see the nominated works through a theomusicological lens traps the perception of the outcome as one glorifying the results and the genre.
There’s a borderline romanticisation of the contemporary Christian/Gospel music genre’s inclusion in the Grammys. It is necessary to have this genre of music represented; however, those nominating, voting, and providing reviews after the fact should all comply consistently with a theomusicological focus. This, then, would allow secular audiences to see a firm thread and application of biblical doctrine in the artists/ensembles. Absent this trajectory, and the post-award report cheering, distorts the honest intent of Christian journals/reporters who seek to supply readers with a grasp of the overarching importance of contemporary Christian/Gospel music.
When reviews are published and speak to an insider community, the outside community acknowledges the language as being a bit self-indulgent, which can lead to a further misunderstanding of faith-based music and biblically-centred expressive discourse. Functioning along the lines of a theomusicological review establishes the foundation of faith-based expressive discourse, allowing the intent of the artists/ensembles to surface, and actual worship as a practice of theomusicology.
Codifying Faith
The closing point of Jubilee Cast’s review, the “Overall Reflection,” is problematic unto itself.
“Taken together, the 2026 GRAMMY winners in Christian and Gospel categories reveal a consistent pattern. Voters prioritized spiritual integrity, artistic excellence, and projects with enduring ecclesial resonance. While innovation and crossover moments were present, they succeeded only when grounded in authenticity.
“In a cultural moment often driven by speed and spectacle, this year’s winners quietly testified to something deeper: faith that lasts, songs that gather, and music that serves both the soul and the church” (Jubilee Cast, Feb. 1, 2026).
As argued, the lack of a cohesive theomusicological inclusion in the nominating, voting, and reporting cycle yields such statements that lean on the vacancy of defining “authenticity,” while signifying on the hyperbole of “faith,” “soul,” and “church.”
First, authenticity is a troubled analysis as it privileges the one providing the narrative. Stating that something is “authentic” positions one’s view as a dominant view, dismissing alternative and equally valuable voices. In this situation, Jubilee Cast, as a mini-case study for Christian music journalism and reviews, positions “authenticity” as one supporting popular opinion of contemporary Christian/Gospel music, rather than looking at the genre, artists/ensembles from a theomusicological perspective. Supporting this self-gratifying position are the terms “faith,” “soul,” and “church,” placed as an essentialized definition of contemporary Christian/Gospel music. Each term has its own value, necessity, and practical involvement in theomusicological. However, Christian music journalists and reviews oversee this point and include faith-based buzz words to provide an essentialist, authentic, privileged, insider perspective that speaks to a self-referential point. This all presents what Pastor Skip Heitzig calls “bumpersticker theology.”
Contextualizing popular opinion of contemporary Christian/Gospel music in such a way outlines a counter-biblical representation; a prideful manner of seeing worship, inconsistent with a theomusicological application.
The Importance Of Using Theomusicology
The current direction of Christian/Gospel music demands consistency. Noting that these two genres have a complicated past but have arrived at a current position to support the same community, music journalists and critics should work in a similar capacity, not against the grain.
Leveraging the qualifications of theomusicology is the binding agent for this process. The founding and extended principles of theomusicology (personal testimony, discipleship, evangelism, bible-centered text/lyrics, community, and activism) serve to articulate, consistently, each of the intended parameters that Christian writers, critics, and journals seek to sustain and progress for contemporary Christian/Gospel music. Allowing this dynamic, useful epistemological discipline to remain separate from the current practice of Christian musical representation and local-global presentation brings back the troubled waters of segregation in the genre.
The growth of contemporary Christian/Gospel music has come so far as to reduce or essentialize the potential evolution of the genre. Theomusicology is more than an academic discipline. Theomusicology is the active agent for faith-based, contemporary Christian/Gospel music; a scripture-sounding agent for the plurality of a Christian expressive sonic identity.
The list below is from Jubilee Cast (Feb. 1, 2026) and includes the reviewer’s comments.
Gospel Performance/Song
Winner: “Come Jesus Come” — CeCe Winans featuring Shirley Caesar
CeCe Winans, Shirley Caesar, Come Jesus Come (Official Video), March 14, 2025,
This win felt both timely and timeless. “Come Jesus Come” is not built for trend cycles or streaming algorithms; it is rooted in prayer, longing, and theological clarity. The pairing of CeCe Winans with Shirley Caesar brought generational authority to a song that resonated as a modern hymn. In a strong field that included Kirk Franklin, Tasha Cobbs Leonard, and Jonathan McReynolds, voters ultimately affirmed reverence over reinvention.
Our take: A deserved win that underscores gospel music’s enduring spiritual core.
Contemporary Christian Music Performance/Song
Winner: “Hard Fought Hallelujah” — Brandon Lake with Jelly Roll
Brandon Lake, Jelly Roll, Hard Fought Hallelujah, February 7, 2025,
Perhaps the most predictable and defensible win of the night. “Hard Fought Hallelujah” captured the emotional language of contemporary faith: wounded, honest, and resilient. Brandon Lake continues to define the sound of modern worship’s emotional center, while Jelly Roll’s contribution felt testimonial rather than transactional. The collaboration transcended genre without diluting conviction.
Our take: A clear reflection of where CCM is heading-raw faith expressed in public spaces.
Gospel Album
Winner: Heart of Mine — Darrel Walls & PJ Morton
Darrel Walls & PJ Morton, HEART OF MINE (Official Audio), August 10, 2025,
This project stood out for its craftsmanship. Blending church-rooted gospel sensibilities with refined musical artistry, Heart of Mine felt intimate and intentional. While live albums and powerhouse vocal showcases dominated the category, voters rewarded a record that leaned into nuance, restraint, and musicianship.
Our take: A win that affirms gospel as both ministry and art.
Contemporary Christian Music Album
Winner: Coritos Vol. 1 — Israel & New Breed
Israel & New Breed, Unified Sound, Coritos de Fuego, April 5, 2025,
This victory carried legacy weight. Coritos Vol. 1 celebrated multilingual, multicultural worship and reminded listeners of Israel & New Breed’s decades-long influence on the global church. While other nominees boasted strong commercial momentum, this album represented something broader: the sound of the gathered people of God.
Our take: A legacy-forward win that honors worship as communal formation, not just consumption.
Roots Gospel Album
Winner: I Will Not Be Moved (Live) — The Brooklyn Tabernacle Choir
Brooklyn Tabernacle Choir Album Premiere Concert: I Will Not Be Moved, March 5, 2025,
Few wins felt more fitting. The Brooklyn Tabernacle Choir remains synonymous with congregational worship and unembellished gospel tradition. In a category defined by heritage, this live recording embodied continuity, faithfulness, and spiritual gravity.
Our take: A reaffirmation that roots gospel remains anchored in the church, not trends.
A complete listing of all the nominees and winners of the Christian/Gospel genre for the 68th Grammy Awards can be found on the Grammys homepage, the Gospel Music Association (Feb. 3, 2026), and other sources such as News Release Today (Feb. 1, 2026).
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In