A while back, my friend Steven Wedgeworth wrote an outstanding essay over at The Calvinist International on the origins of Halloween. It’s an annual must-read. The gist is that Halloween is not some ancient pagan festival or even Christian subversion of demonic shenanigans (as a lot of Christian writers have claimed over the years). The truth is far more boring. Halloween as we know it is really little more than a 20th century invention designed to sell stuff.
After I posted Wedgeworth’s piece, some friends of mine raised the objection that no matter what the origin of Halloween, it’s still “dark,” which violates 1 Corinthians 6:14-18. “Witches, ghosts, demons, and death,” remarked one friend. “Why would I want anything to do with it?”
“Darkness” here is ill-defined. What does it mean, exactly? Things we consider icky? That will vary from person to person. I know people who don’t watch or read “The Lord of the Rings” because it’s got too much “icky” stuff in it. They’re missing the best Christian fantasy of the 20th century.
I’ve said this before and I’ll keep saying it: Christians who object to Halloween are, nine times out of ten, objecting to aesthetics, not morality. We’ve confused the two, and you see the result in evangelical churches. “Dark” aesthetics are not allowed, and neither is mournful or darker music, which has historically been a huge part of the Church’s worship and liturgical life.
Sure, there are limits. I can definitely see the case against decking your yard to look like a chainsaw massacre took place. But the objection to Halloween’s “spooky” aesthetic seems to rest mainly in a conditioned Christian preference for the “happy, clappy,” Precious Moments kind of wholesome–not on a reasoned moral stance.
Image: Wikimedia Commons