Two Prayer Breakfasts, Two Visions of America

Two Prayer Breakfasts, Two Visions of America February 2, 2012

Today the political elite of the United States engaged in an annual tradition, the National Prayer Breakfast, attended by every president since Eisenhower, and held up by supporters as a peace-making, problem-solving moment of unity.

President Obama at the 2012 National Prayer Breakfast.

“The purpose of the National Prayer Breakfast, which will be held for the 60th time on Thursday, is to attempt to bridge political and even religious differences through what is called “the spirit of Jesus of Nazareth” in order that leaders consider a Higher Authority to Whom they are ultimately accountable and answerable. […] One can debate whether the National Prayer Breakfast engages in a type of “civil religion,” but there is much good that emerges from it. For at least a short time, politicians — from the President of the United States on down — acknowledge they are not as powerful as the Almighty.”

However, as Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) point out,  the organizers of this event, the Fellowship Foundation (aka “The Family”) use its influence to further a noxious agenda.

“Outside of Washington, “The Family” has used its government clout to facilitate backdoor meetings between U.S. and foreign officials, and has persuaded members of Congress, including Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), to engage in Fellowship-sanctioned evangelizing while traveling at taxpayer expense. uncovered, revolting detail, the lengths to which members of “The Family” went to help Laurent Gbagbo, the now former president and dictator of the Ivory Coast, hold on to power.  Mr. Gbagbo is now in The Hague awaiting trial by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity.  “The Family” has also supported abhorrent anti-gay legislation in Uganda.”

Journalist and author Jeff Sharlet, who as written two important books about this organization, “The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power” and “C Street: The Fundamentalist Threat to American Democracy,” says that the Fellowship Foundation has been waging a war on the United States’ Establishment Clause since its formation.

“Domestically, The Family have long been at the heart of the Christianist assault on the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause – “Congress shall make no laws respecting the establishment of religion” – which is the guarantee of the Free Exercise Clause that makes America free (in theory, at least) for Pagan. In 1953, The Family established the National Prayer Breakfast; in 1954, Family politicians led the fight for “Under God” in the pledge and “In God We Trust” on our currency. More recently, Representative Tony Hall, a conservative Democrat from Ohio, made the National Day of Prayer a fixed, permanent affair, with White House observance orchestrated by Shirley Dobson – wife of Christian Right leader Jim Dobson.”

The fact that a group tied to abhorrent and lethal anti-gay legislation in Uganda, and committed to an agenda that mocks our constitution, is still awarded such position in our society says much about the venality of our political climate and the clout this group has been allowed to cultivate. Instead of an interfaith event, or secular gathering, our nation’s moment of unity is interpreted through the lens of Christianity, and a limited, conservative, empire-minded, Christianity at that. This audacious enforcement of a Christian America technically side-steps constitutional issues by being a “private” event, a fact that allows smaller, local, prayer breakfasts to invite notoriously controversial figures while avoiding litigation.

This year, thanks to Occupy Faith D.C., there’s an interfaith People’s Prayer Breakfast that calls on Americans “to pray and to stand in unity with those suffering economic hardship and inequality in our nation.”

“…where people of all faiths can both listen to and offer up the prayers of the poor. It’s an event where all are welcome, but we especially invite those who are impoverished or work with impoverished people groups to come and bring their prayers. We will offer up the prayers of children in the form of artwork on the theme of “enough for everyone”, first to God, and then to the attendees at the National Prayer Breakfast.”

So here we have two competing Prayer Breakfasts, and two competing views of our nation. One favors gathering power and establishing Christianity as the focal point of national unity, while the other opens its doors to all faiths, and concerns itself with those who aren’t being served or supported by our current system. One is about back room deals, while the other is about “breakout sessions.” Only one of these visions is one in which modern Paganism has a place at the table, and its that vision that our interfaith efforts work on building. As our community, our movement, continues to grow, we need to work on growing institutions and events that are inclusive, open, and support our core values. Eventually, with enough work, perhaps we can build a large enough interfaith coalition to challenge The Family’s Prayer Breakfast, to provide a robust counter-narrative that is truly in the grand spirit of our secular nation.

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

4 responses to “Two Prayer Breakfasts, Two Visions of America”

  1. This is kind of stuff that scares/upsets me . That a clearly right wing extremist group can become so powerful. If Romney sticks to his moderate ways he doesn’t worry me that much.But if Gingrich or Santorum got into office w/ thier ties to RR , i would be worried.What i’m hoping for is for Obama to get re-elected and the Dems to gain control of congress so we fix the current mess in Washington, our disfunctional govt.If the republicans gain the presidency we are in deep trouble . These fools believe Reaganomics was a good idea. As Obama so well put it , they will drive us back into the ditch …..probably even deeper.An extrtemist Left religious adgenda will put this country in a much worse place for those of us not in the Christian Majority . Folks like NAR and AFA want to make this country a Christian Nation a theocracy , goverened by thier Christian principles . With a left wing president w/ RR ties and RR ties in both parts of the legisalative branch this becomes more of a possibility. We need to keep a real CLOSE eye on these people so this can’t happen . Otherwise alot of Americans myself includud will more than likely leave the country . Kilm

  2. Wikipedia has a good article on the history of “The Fellowship Foundation”–

    Rachel Maddow (a news commentator who has her own show on MSNBC) does some fantastic reporting about this group, which is also called the “C Street” group and “The Family.”

    Here’s something I found interesting (from the Wikipedia page):

    “Sir Vivian Gabriel, a British Air Commission attaché in Washington during World War II, established a branch of the Family (International Christian Leadership Association) in the United Kingdom. Ernest Williams, a member of the directing staff of the British Admiralty and a member of the Archbishop of Canterbury’s Commission on Evangelism, served as its president in the 1960s. Williams worked closely with Harald Bredesen, a British intelligence operative who went on to personally mentor Rev. Pat Robertson in the United States.”

  3. I’m confused by what you’re saying here. The “policies” and agenda of the Family are right-wing, extremely right-wing. As for “extremist Left religious agenda”, well generally speaking most extreme leftists don’t have a religious agenda. Also, it needs be said that Obama is no more left-wing, liberal, or progressive than my old school Methodist grandmother, though on occasion he does talk a good game.

  4. Chris Hayes had a great segment on his show about this, this weekend. (He’s also on MSNBC…early Saturday and Sunday mornings.)