A Few (Not So New) Things About the Pew Study: (and its a good study btw, its just not particularly new to us) here it is for your perusal:
2. One cannot examine the conversion efforts of Protestants towards Latinos/as without confronting the anti-Catholic animus that often lies beneath those efforts, especially in Latin America
3. The move towards Pentecostalism has to be examined more closely, to expect Latinos to convert to Pentecostalism and come out some version of white conservative Republicans is a often a desired effect of conversion, but rarely is that the outcome.
4. Latinos/as are diverse….I know it sounds simple, but it bares repeating and repeating and repeating…the idea that any one religious movement has a “lock” on the whole of Latino/a religious experience is historically and empirically inaccurate.
5. You cannot talk about conversion efforts historically or today without talking about the desire of the Catholic Church & Protestant churches to assimilate Latinos/as into some Americanization scheme.6. White Supremacy, Cultural Supremacy & the Equating of Christianity with Civilization are not outmoded ideas of a colonial past, they are residuals of a paternalism evident in all sectors of Latino/a Christianity
7. Missing here is any in-depth look at Latina evangelicals, who are the demographic most responsible for conversion efforts, but rarely if ever do they have centralized power in the church.
8. Latino/a “nones” have existed for centuries, the category is new, the reality is not. What is different are the reasons given for that choice & again one has to look at demographics for clues to where the trend toward none goes from here.
9. Latino/as are diverse (see no. 4)… mainline Protestants on the East Coast, Pentecostals in Texas, nones in California, all different ages, nationalities, generations…that kind of depth is rarely explored.
10. The desire to claim triumph (as some of my evangelical colleagues are want to do) or worry endlessly about decline (as some of my Catholic colleague are want to do) should be tempered by the fact that this is a historic pattern that is quite normal, hardly shocking, and part of the rhythms of religious affiliation and disaffiliation–nothing really new here—let’s move on.