From Charity to Justice: A Prophetic Reinterpretation of Christian Mission

Reading Katharine Jefferts Schori’s Gathering at God’s Table made me proud to be an Episcopalian in the ordination process.

Then again, this is nothing new. Every time I hear Jefferts Schori preach or read her sermons and essays, I am re-energized in my vocation, renewed in my passion and reassured that the Episcopal church is my spiritual home.

That’s what a good bishop does.

In her new book, Jefferts Schori does the profoundly Episcopalian thing in her book on modern mission activity. She takes the mission tradition of the Anglican church (the five marks of mission) and reinterprets them through the Table and the baptismal covenant with informed, reasoned and prophetic messages. This easily digestible book should serve as a wonderful introduction to the encouraging direction Jefferts-Schori hopes for in the Episcopal church. The book, heavy with anecdotes from her travels as a presiding bishop of the denomination makes the book not only move quickly and intimately but also makes the book a terrific work of story-telling evangelism in itself.

Toward the end of the book, Jefferts Schori begins to shift toward a more social justice and systematic perspective on mission. To me, this is significant. Until then, the book had been filled mostly with progressive versions of being witnesses to God’s love for all and with examples of charitable outreach. Her move toward the more systemic approach to mission provides a both/and tone, but I can’t help but read a certain push in her concluding chapters toward a more systematic approach within the church regarding mission and justice work.

And with good reason, too.

“Mission” certainly has a problematic history, tied as it is to imperialism, genocide and wiping out indigenous religions, languages and traditions. To her credit, Jefferts Schori doesn’t ignore this. But importantly and prophetically, she points to another blindspot with Christianity that might one day prove to just as problematic: the church’s charity complex.

“Networks are a powerful counterforce to the charity or colonial models that have too often characterized Christian mission. we are beginning to heal from some of that unidirectional mission work … that grew out of an arrogance about supposedly superior gifts and they are healed or corrected through discovering the gifts of the poor and the other.”

Instead of relying solely on charitable work that often requires a “victim” and a “savior” (you can see its appeal to Christians!), Jefferts-Schori recommends building networks and collaborations with other Christians, those of other faiths and those who do not follow a religious path. She saves this dynamite punch for the very end, after peppering her book with almost examples almost exclusively of church charity.

Recasting mission in these terms might well be provocative to many, I would wager, because it forges the meaning of mission not in terms of making Christians throughout the world but of doing justice with others throughout the world. But it had me nodding in agreement and saying, “Thanks be to God” over and over again.

Hopefully, if Jefferts-Schori ever updates her book for a future edition, she’ll have to edit in a number of examples of churches doing justice on a systemic level. I truly hope for this and that our churches will embrace our bishops vision for mission in the 21st century.

Read more about Gathering at God’s Table, including a Q&A with Jefferts Schori, at the Patheos Book Club.

Liberating Pentecost

 

Fire! Fire! by David Hogg

God speaks.

And the people understood.

This confused them.

In a nutshell, this is Pentecost, or at least, the most intriguing detail of the famous Acts story. But too often this significant detail gets lost in the celebration of rushing wind, fiery tongues and the so-called birth of the church.

The disciples had gathered in Jerusalem during the festival of Shavuot. Pilgrims from around the known world had gathered for the celebration when suddenly the disciples burst forth into the packed streets. From the mouths of a bunch of uncouth, uneducated, disreputable Galileans come a multilingual message of all the magnificent works of God. During a festival celebrating the Torah, law of God given and unified in a single language and people, the Divine voice breaks through and speaks in an unmatched diversity of languages.

And each person heard and understood – in their native tongue no less – the message of God. That much is clear from the text.

What confused the people wasn’t the message. What confused them was that they all understood it.

And so they ask what does it all mean?

Peter answers with the Christian gospel.

I’m convinced he gave them the wrong answer.

I’m not saying the Christian gospel is wrong or backwards, to be clear. I’m just saying that he didn’t really answer their question. The people didn’t want to know what the disciples thought the message of God was. They had already heard and understood God’s message in their own languages. What they wanted to know was what, in God’s name, did it mean that they could all understand it.

What did it mean that the voice of God had spoken outside of the divine language of the Torah? What did it mean that the message of God had broken through the levees of the religious elites in the Temple and spoken in all the angelic tongues of humanity? What did it mean that the voice of God was not reserved for the imperial Latin of the oppressors?

What did it mean that God spoke in the tongues of the powerless? What did it mean that God gave the divine voice to the languages of a bunch of nobodies?

Let’s us not forget the importance and power of language, how forbidding religious language in native and indigenous tongues has marred with cynical imperialism Christianity’s history of missionary activity. Let us not forget how oppressive regimes the world over have rubbed out indigenous languages as a means of maintaining power and authority, have forbidden children to speak their mother tongue, have tried to stamp out the language that binds together a rival culture.

Pentecost is about that most Christian of concepts. It is about liberation. In many ways, it continues Jesus’ work as the liberator of God’s love for all people, his work that circumvented the powerful religious elites who exploited the people of God by holding access to the Temple at arm’s length. It continues Jesus’ work of transforming the transcendent God into an immanent one.

So what does it all mean?

It means that God has been liberated by Christ.

It means that God still speaks and those who find themselves in imperial cultures might to well to participate in Pentecost with open ears and listen for the voice of God among the powerless, among the oppressed, among the nobodies.

It means to listen, and be changed.