Newsbites: The controversy edition!

Lawsuits and elections and marketing, oh my!

1. Stephen Harper, who may or may not be re-elected Prime Minister when Canadians go to the polls on Tuesday, has pulled the plug on a controversial clause in Bill C-10 that would have allowed the government to deny tax credits to Canadian films for their “morally offensive” content. (Many critics had noted that the clause, which would have denied the credits to those films after the films had already been made, would have made it incredibly difficult to arrange financing for Canadian films before they were made, and thus could have had a radically destabilizing influence on the industry as a whole.) Filmmakers have welcomed the news, of course, and Harper’s decision to abandon this clause has been interpreted by some as “a major blow to the religious right”, because a number of social conservatives, notably Charles McVety, had spoken in favour of the clause and had even taken credit for its inclusion in the bill in the first place. — Globe and Mail, Canadian Press, Hollywood Reporter, Variety

2. Yoko Ono has dropped her lawsuit against the makers of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed — but just to be safe, the DVD version that comes out in two weeks will not feature the John Lennon song that prompted the lawsuit in the first place. — Reuters

3. Religulous is attracting laughter and applause, but some observers think it is merely “preaching to the choir.” In other news, one Christian blogger notes that the studio distributing the film, i.e. Lionsgate, is also the studio that sells Lee Strobel’s The Case for Faith: The Film on DVD, and it is involved with other films that have a faith-based connection, as well. So, yeah, as with many businesses, so here: it’s the money-making potential, and not the philosophy of any given product, that matters to the company in the end. — Reuters, Christians in Cinema

4. Speaking of Lionsgate, the studio is also distributing a horror movie called House — which is not to be confused with the 1986 film of that name. The new film, which comes out November 7, is based on a novel by Christian author Ted Dekker, but it is also rated R — so the studio is reportedly uncertain how to go about marketing the film. Should it go for the Christian base, or should it try to reel in regular horror fans? You might think that The Passion of the Christ (2004) had proved that Christians can be open to seeing R-rated movies with a religious component, but apparently the studio isn’t convinced. — Ted Dekker

"And not to mention that a lot of these movies are NOT originally 1.33 display ..."

Disney cartoons, aspect ratios, bad transfers.
"I'm still hoping that it's released in the US this year. Hoping the same for ..."

Watch: The makers of Mary Magdalene ..."
"No matter how you depict the life and death of Jesus there will be no ..."

History and tradition in movie depictions ..."
"Then notes that:"And this is actually a more faithful portrayal of what is recorded in ..."

Exodus: Gods and Kings: no “parting” ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Good news about c-10, now if they only decide to pull the plug on those other lame bills they have proposed.

  • I think that House the movie will be a click on November 7. I’m a fan of both authors, read some of their books, unfortunately I haven’t read House yet (too busy right now). There are lots of people waiting for the showing of this film in theaters, the schedule has been changed several times (I think this is the final date but better check their official website, )

  • I’ve seen the movie ,House and I liked it! The film is awesome with such casts. The scenes are pretty creepy! I also like the performance of Michael Madsen as well as Bill Moseley.

    You’ve got to see this movie guys, I know you’ll love it as much as I do. 🙂