How Sarah Connor made the war worse.


I watched The Terminator (1984) from start to finish for the first time in years last night, and I was amused by the opening title card’s declaration that this film would show us “the final battle” in the war between humans and machines. “The final battle”? Tell that to the sequel-makers.

But what really struck me were the deleted scenes, which I don’t believe I had watched since I first got the DVD in 2001. And why did they strike me? Because they make it fairly clear that, on some level at least, Sarah Connor is responsible for the war.

That’s right, Sarah Connor is responsible for the war.

How can this be, you say?

Well, in one deleted scene, Sarah looks up Cyberdyne in the phone book — just like the Terminator looked up her in the phone book! — and tells Kyle excitedly that they can destroy Cyberdyne and prevent the war from happening. After some arguing, and a bit of an emotional breakdown on Kyle’s part, Kyle finally agrees to do this. (So you can see, in this, the seeds of Sarah’s later vigilante actions in T2.)

YouTube Preview Image
Click here if the video file above doesn’t play properly.

And then, in another deleted scene set a few hours after Sarah has successfully destroyed the Terminator, we see that the Terminator’s crushed remains have been noticed by a couple guys, one of whom instructs the other guy to take the Terminator’s microcomputer chassis over to the company’s R&D; department. We then cut to the outside of the building, as Sarah is loaded into an ambulance, and the camera pans up to reveal … the Cyberdyne logo on the front of the building. (So you can see, in this, the seeds of T2‘s later revelation that Skynet will grow out of the pieces of the Terminator that survived the original film.)

YouTube Preview Image
Click here if the video file above doesn’t play properly.

Is it a coincidence that Sarah, Kyle and the Terminator ended up in the Cyberdyne building? To a point, yes. The car chase that immediately preceded the chase-on-foot in the Cyberdyne factory was pretty crazy, and who could have predicted where the various wrecks and explosions would have ended up? But on the other hand, no, it wasn’t all that coincidental. Why were they in the vicinity of the Cyberdyne building in the first place? Because, as we saw in the earlier deleted scene, Sarah and Kyle had agreed to try to sabotage Cyberdyne. They were already making their way over there.

So. Just as the Terminator came back in time to kill Sarah and prevent the birth of John Connor, thereby inadvertently drawing Kyle Reese back in time and guaranteeing the birth of John Connor, so too Sarah Connor tried to destroy Cyberdyne and prevent the birth of Skynet, thereby inadvertently drawing the Terminator towards the Cyberdyne factory and guaranteeing the rise of Skynet. And this point — this similarity between the two characters’ actions, and the consequences of their actions — is underscored by visual motifs such as the phone-book scanning.

I can see why these scenes were deleted from the film. For one thing, they created an ambiguity around Sarah and her actions that could have complicated our feelings towards her. In a sense, they almost put her on the same level as the machines that sent the Terminator back in time: both she and the machines suffer from a kind of hubris, believing that they can change the past (in the machines’ case) or the future (in Sarah’s case), but in the end all they do is guarantee their own failure.

Of course, commercial cinema being what it is, The Terminator ended up having sequels anyway, “final battle” or no “final battle”. And ironically, as the series has continued to unfold, Sarah’s actions have turned out to have even more unforeseen consequences.

In Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991), Sarah tries once again to destroy Cyberdyne — and this time, to cut a long story short, she succeeds! The nuclear war no longer happens on 1997 as everyone predicted … but it does happen several years later, in 2004, as per the events of Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003). (Or in 2011, as per one of the timelines in The Sarah Connor Chronicles.) Sarah did not completely prevent Judgment Day; instead, she merely delayed it. And so, as John Connor says in the trailers for Terminator Salvation, he now has to face the fact that “this is not the future my mother warned me about.”

The guaranteed victory of the original movie — the fact that the war was over and the “final battle” had already been won — has been completely undone. John no longer has any assurance that he can win this war. And all because Sarah would not accept the prophecy that she had been given.

About Peter T. Chattaway

Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his film column, which won multiple awards from the Evangelical Press Association, the Canadian Church Press and the Fellowship of Christian Newspapers, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books & Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson’s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004) and Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis’s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005).

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/03544851253101381512 MaCanuck

    You know, if I hadn’t watched T3 last night for the first time, I might have been a bit miffed at you for blowing the ending. Of course, I didn’t really have much desire to watch the movie until it was on last night and I said to myself, “well, if I want to see T:S, I suppose I should.”

    Then again, without that ending, you couldn’t really have T:S, though I supposed Judgement Day could have been moved to that movie…

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/07395937367596387523 Peter T Chattaway

    Well, this is hardly the first time I have discussed the ending of T3 at this blog. And after six years and a huge ad campaign for T4, yeah, I think the fact that the war is “on” now really ought to be common knowledge.

    There may have been people who went to see Star Trek III: The Search for Spock without first watching Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, and who went into the theatre wondering, “Why would anybody be searching for Spock? Did he go somewhere?” But at some point you just have to assume that anybody who would have cared all that much has figured it out by now.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/03544851253101381512 MaCanuck

    The operative phrase here is “anyone who cared”

    I suspect that since I didn’t really care to much about T3 (having seen too many reviews that lambasted it), I didn’t care, so that info passed without registering on the radar. It’s a bit like the person who had never seen a Joshua Tree before, then someone pointed out what a Joshua Tree looked like, and she realized that she had one in her front yard….

    However, all those lambasting reviews meant that the movie was actually better than I was expecting. Not much, but still…

  • Anonymous

    If John Connor knew about the future attempted genocide of mankind by Skynet why did he let the death camps almost wipe humanity out before starting the resistance?

  • DaylenAmell

    Sarah failed to realize that the future can’t be changed, someone or some company or of course, the military, would have continued Cyberdyne’s work. When John sends Kyle back to the past, this time he better tell him to stop his mother from anything like that again, and get the timeline corrected so that Judgment Day happens in 1997.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X