Last month, producer Doug Gresham hinted that he was “ambivalent” about the changes on this film in a way that he hadn’t been on the previous two films, and a press release issued last summer suggested that King Caspian and the other characters will now be embarking on their journey not simply to find the seven lost Lords of Narnia, as they did in the book, but to “save Narnia, and all the astonishing creatures in it, from an unfathomable fate.”
Now, director Michael Apted has revealed another development that is giving some Narnia fans pause. In a recent interview with the Australian version of Empire magazine, he stated:
a sea serpent and a dragon, this is a character story. The quality of the book, and the appeal of the book, is that it’s more of an emotional than a swashbuckling adventure.”“This is a lot more psychological; it’s not a big action movie. There are a lot of different locations and adventures but, apart from a huge battle at the end with
There are definitely a lot of positive lines here, like “not a big action movie” and “a character story.” But I’m sure that the bit that will leave everybody talking is the line “a huge battle at the end with a sea serpent and a dragon.” Is this dragon Eustace? If so, did they move Dragon Island to the end of the movie? Or just the bit where Eustace turns back into a boy? Only 11 months of speculating to go!
Meanwhile, in other news, the Washington Times ran a story on New Year’s Eve quoting someone who quoted a former script adviser who said the film was “drifting” from C.S. Lewis’s original vision. It’s hearsay, sure, but where there’s smoke, there tends to be fire, and right now it seems like there’s a lot of smoke.