Matt Chandler’s New Book & the Neo-Reformed (New Calvinist) Movement

The good folks at Patheos asked me to review Matt Chandler’s new book, To Live is Christ, To Die is Gain.

Since Matt was kind enough to endorse one of my books, I decided to accept their request.

To Live Is Christ, to Die Is Gain - By: Matt Chandler, Jared C. Wilson

Before I talk about the book, a few personal words about Chandler.

Matt Chandler and I have never met, but we’ve had some correspondence in the past.

I remember when I heard that he had a brain tumor and I was burdened to lift him up. The Lord healed him, thankfully.

Chandler is typically lumped in with the Neo-Reformed crowd. From my experience and the experience of many of my friends, this is a group that is noted for not fellowshipping outside its own borders. There are exceptions, however.

Matt is one of the few Reformed people who said yes to Jesus <grin> along with Reformed Professor Steve Brown.

(Steve Brown happens to be one of the most remarkable Reformed Christians on the planet today, by the way.)

Adrian Warnock is another Reformed brother who is non-sectarian and moves outside his camp to fellowship with and listen to other servants of God. For that reason, I have a lot of respect for Adrian.

In addition, Joe Carter (of the Gospel Coalition) and John Ortberg both graciously endorsed God’s Favorite Place on Earth. Again, this sort of thing is uncommon for many in the Reformed camp (to endorse a book from someone who isn’t part of their tribe).

Incidentally, if you’re finding this blog for the first time, you may think I’m anti-Reformed. Not so. I’m both Reformed and Arminian and I’m neither at the same time.

I think Calvin and Wesley were both remarkable servants of God. They just emphasized different sets of Scripture and built their theology around them.

But one thing I deeply despise is the spirit of sectarianism and elitism. And these twin plagues are in the drinking water of many movements in the Body of Christ today.

As I’ve said elsewhere, sectarianism and elitism are like body odor. The people who have it don’t know it, but everyone else can smell it a mile away.

Point: If you only listen to and give credence to those who are part of your denomination or your movement or your tribe, you will always be short-sighted (though you may not realize it).

We have not so learned Jesus Christ to enclose ourselves in this way.

The Body of Christ contains many members and we must be open to all of them.

“The eye cannot say to the hand, ‘I have no need of you’,” said Paul.

That doesn’t just mean a glib head-nod to the oneness of Christ’s Body.

It means and demands fellowship.

It means and demands interaction.

It means and demands communication.

They drew a circle that shut me out —
Heretic, rebel, a thing to flout.
But Love and I had the wit to win:
We drew a circle that took them in.

~ Edwin Markham

That said, Matt’s book is a discussion based on the book of Philippians. It reads like a casual sermon on the letter (and if I had to guess, it’s based on talks he delivered on Philippians). Some biblical exegesis with personal anecdotes and contemporary illustrations woven in.

Matt uses Philippians to describe the journey toward spiritual maturity. I’m not so sure Paul had “spiritual maturity” in mind as the theme for his letter, but it’s fine to use it that way and Matt does a fine job with this approach.

Having looked at Philippians for a long time, I find it interesting that the church was made up mostly of women, and at the time Paul wrote the letter, it was around 10 years old. That’s ancient in the ancient world.

Like most of his letters to churches, Paul was writing to a church in crisis. Several of the women in Philippi were at one another’s throats (for instance). And Paul had to call on one of the mature brothers to help them break loose of one another. The church was splitting at the seams, so Philippians was a call to remind them of their Lord and refocus them back on who they really were.

(Okay, this is what comes out of me when I talk about Philippians. Back to Matt’s book.)

In short, I found the book to be an easy-to-read, popular discussion on Philippians that’s suited (especially, I feel) for new Christians. If Matt and I ever meet in person or talk on the phone, we’d discover that we have a tremendous amount of common ground to tread. That sentence in itself says volumes about what I think about his new book. 🙂

New! A Unique Online Discipleship Course. Click the banner below for more information.

"Thank you, Frank. I consider A.W. Tozer one of my spiritual fathers. His Pursuit of ..."

Never Own Anything by A.W. Tozer
"Interesting! Have never heard of Melanchthon. Will have to read more about him. Thanks for ..."

The Force Behind the Protestant Reformation ..."
"When diversity within orthodoxy is encountered, grace should be extended. Just as we would want ..."

Shocking Beliefs of Augustine
"I have just read this entire interview. I will not critique Boyd's books, because I ..."

My Interview with Greg Boyd on ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Greg Carlet


    Thanks for this. I have been extremely encouraged and loved by God through
    Matt’s preaching over the years.

    I very much relate to: “I’m both Reformed and Arminian and I’m neither at
    the same time.”

    I also very much agree with: “I deeply despise is the spirit of sectarianism and elitism.”

    Thanks again for writing this.

  • Lee Zuber

    Hmmmm….Matt Chandler WITH Jared D. Wilson. Ghost writer perhaps?? I didn’t know about ghost writing until your insightful post. Thanks Frank!