UPDATE: Did one of Hillary’s emails lead to this man’s execution in Iran?


Former Navy SEAL and former Blackwater CEO Erik Prince comments on Shahram Amiri’s execution:

When he went back to Iran, there was no talk of him being executed. Once her emails were released, he was executed. What does it mean? It means, once again, America does not take care of the people that help America. This guy was a treasure trove of information on the Iranian nuclear program. He’s dead.


Hillary Clinton’s lack of discretion knows no bounds.  Sen. Tom Cotton said the Democratic nominee discussed details about Shahram Amiri, an Iranian nuclear scientist who’d  given the United States secret information about their nuclear program. [Read more…]

Devastating Critique: “I learned more from working at McDonald’s than at college”

Screen Shot 2016-08-06 at 1.13.56 PM

So, I admit it.  I dropped out of David Lipscomb University, New York University, and the University of Kentucky…  never having received a college degree.  I have had many many jobs.  I sold nurse uniforms, stuffed envelopes for a band, served eggs at the Huddle House, wiped bottoms at a daycare center, poured wine at a catering company, cleaned bed pans at the hospital, refreshed coffee at a lumber company, made presentations for coal mining engineers, and taught rich kids in Manhattan how to ride bikes inside our athletic store on Broadway. [Read more…]

Trump spokesperson in 2012: Aren’t There Any “Pure Breeds” Left?

This should surprise precisely no one, but for some reason I’m taken aback by these little nuggets every time I come across them. [Read more…]

What do 3 of the top 4 NYT best sellers have in common?

According to the Washington Examiner, “For the first time, three of the top four New York Times nonfiction best sellers are anti-Clinton books.”

So what are they?  Here are three of the top books in America: [Read more…]

Pages: 1 2 3

3 reasons why Wayne Grudem is wrong about supporting Donald Trump (and you might be too)

A Phoenix Seminary professor Wayne Grudem published a piece called “Why Voting for Donald Trump is a Morally Good Choice,” in which the teacher of ethics purports to assuage the guilty consciences of Christian Trump voters.  Why would Christians feel conflicted about their Trump support?  Grudem himself explains:

He is egotistical, bombastic, and brash. He often lacks nuance in his statements. Sometimes he blurts out mistaken ideas (such as bombing the families of terrorists) that he later must abandon. He insults people. He can be vindictive when people attack him. He has been slow to disown and rebuke the wrongful words and actions of some angry fringe supporters. He has been married three times and claims to have been unfaithful in his marriages.

But Grudem goes on to say that it is morally right — and good — to support Trump anyway.  Here’s are 3 reasons Grudem is wrong.

1. He creates a fictional version of Donald Trump that is much better than the real version.

Grudem describes a fictional Trump who will be, as David French wrote, better than ever other Republican president. “Every single Republican president has failed and appoint the judges who will overturn Roe. He’ll cut taxes, ease racial tensions, rebuild the military, secure our borders, stand up to Russia, and repeal ObamaCare – all while replacing it with a superior free-market alternative. Grudem’s Trump makes Ronald Reagan look like a loser.”

Pages: 1 2 3