A conservative argument for the morality of abortion

A conservative argument for the morality of abortion

Most pro-abortion people don’t even give a moral argument to support their position. They just invoke the mother’s choice and go from there. But here is an argument FROM A CONSERVATIVE who argues that not only is abortion moral, but NOT aborting a Down’s Syndrome child is IMMORAL. From the First Things Blog:

Nicholas Provenzo of the Center for the Advancement of Capitalism is “troubled” by the implications of Gov. Sarah Palin’s “decision to knowingly give birth to a child disabled with Down syndrome.” He thinks “it is crucial to reaffirm the morality of aborting a fetus diagnosed with Down syndrome (or by extension, any unborn fetus)—a freedom that anti-abortion advocates seek to deny.” Here’s his line of thinking:  

A parent has a moral obligation to provide for his or her children until these children are equipped to provide for themselves. Because a person afflicted with Down syndrome is only capable of being marginally productive (if at all) and requires constant care and supervision, unless a parent enjoys the wealth to provide for the lifetime of assistance that their child will require, they are essentially stranding the cost of their child’s life upon others.

Answer this.

"I don't know if you're disagreeing or not. You said you didn't understand what is ..."

Flame’s New Book on Church Fathers ..."
"It is unclear to me what you think I am saying and how it is ..."

Flame’s New Book on Church Fathers ..."
"Regarding those who hear the word, but don't live it, I am speaking of both ..."

Flame’s New Book on Church Fathers ..."
"The Sacraments are viewed by Lutherans as a means of grace. They are points of ..."

Flame’s New Book on Church Fathers ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!