Bush says farewell

James,

Nice comparison to TR/Wilson, however if Obama is anywhere near as bad for the country as Wilson was I can’t imagine the country being around for too much longer.

Exactly right, Peter.

I think President Bush can take comfort in the immense respect and affection he recieves from most of his staff. In time, the country will come to understand the value of his hard decisions. I think that Katrina and the handling of the financial crisis will be black marks.

I am encouraged that Obama appears to be far more sensible than many of his admirers on the Left. I am optimistic that America’s standing in the world might ultimately benefit from the bad cop/good cop dynamic; now that Bush has dealt with some of the world’s thorniest issues, it has created space for Obama to win friends.

But we’ll see. I pray that our new president is sensible and moderate, even as I look forward to replacing him in four years with someone whos values I can support.

It seems that actually Bush was the unrealistic utopian Wilsonian in our era. *Some* of us conservatives see it more this way — http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/the_end_of_an_error/
Jack Hunter says, “What conservatism has the Bush era produced? Exploding government, enhanced state power, reckless spending, increased federal programs, open borders, starting a needless and costly war – the list is endless – and yet most self-described mainstream conservatives have little criticism for this catastrophe of a president.” My only disagreement is that I’d say “an unjust war” instead of “a needless war.”

In my opinion, it has devastated evangelicalism and eclipsed the gospel that evangelicals sold their souls to the Republican party.

bush was a sincere man who sincerely did what he thought was best for the country and his ideas of what was best were heavily marked by what happened on september 11.

what actually resulted however, was that bush did everything in his power to create precidents and a constitutional understanding that will do as much as possible to pave the way for an eventual dictator.

he did the exact opposite of honor and reinforce the system of checks and balances.

cheney summarized bush´s view on the reach of executive power by noting the following fact: the president is followed always by someone holding the button that would launch nuclear weapons. the president can push that button at any time without consulting anyone at all. what logically follows from that (in the minds of bush and cheney) is that short of pushing that button, the president has the same unchecked power and authority on all other issues.

I can provide cheneys exact quote if you dont believe he said as much. If cheney DID say this in so many words, what would you all here think of that theory?