Our partnership with the dead, the living, and the unborn

Peter Wehner quotes British journalist Charles Moore, reviewing Jesse Norman’s new biography of the 18th century father of modern conservatism, Edmund Burke:

As his struggles for America, Ireland and Corsica showed, Burke was no automatic defender of existing authority. But what he understood, and expressed with immense rhetorical power, was how human beings stand in relation to one another. Although they are morally autonomous individuals, they do not – cannot – live in isolation. In our language, laws, institutions, religion, and in our families, we are part of a continuum.

Society is ”a partnership not only between those who are living, but between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born’’. It is not society that keeps mankind in chains, but the pretence that now is the only time that matters. Almost every piece of rot you hear in politics comes from those who wish to lock man into what WH Auden called ”the prison of his days’’. It is comforting that the Burkean Jesse Norman is in the House of Commons to tell them when they are wrong.

Mr. Wehner adds his reflections:

It strikes me that this ancient insight–of how we do not live in isolation, that we are part of a continuum–has been a bit neglected by American conservatives in recent years. The emphasis one hears these days has to do almost solely with liberty, which of course is vital. But there is also the trap of hyper-individualism. What’s missing, I think, is an appropriate appreciation–or at least a public appreciation–for community, social solidarity, and the common good; for the obligations and attachments we have to each other and the role institutions play in forming those attachments.

It’s not exactly clear to me why conservatives have neglected these matters. It may be the result of a counter-reaction to President Obama’s expansion of the size, scope, and reach of the federal government, combined with a growing libertarian impulse within conservatism. Whatever the explanation, conservatives are making an error–a political error, a philosophical error, a human error–in ignoring (at least in our public language) this understanding of the richness and fullness of life.

Conservatism has never been simply about being left alone. It is not exclusively about self-reliance, individual drive and “rugged individualism,” as important as these things are. We need to be careful about portraying life in a constricted way, since our characters and personalities and sensibilities are shaped by so many other factors and forces and people all along the way.

Self-reliance surely has a place in our lives. But we also rely on families and friends–and for many of us, on a community of fellow believers–to help us walk through periods of doubt and hardship and failure, as well as to share in our joys and achievements and milestones. We are a part of the main. And I imagine most of us are far more dependent than we ever fully admit on the grace and generosity, the sacrifice and love of others.

via Conservatism and the Limitations of Self-Reliance « Commentary Magazine.

Consider that quotation from Burke’s Reflections on the French Revolution, that society is ”a partnership not only between those who are living, but between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born’.’  How does that principle apply to issues today  (e.g., abortion, the national debt, gay marriage, etc.)?

Do you agree that today’s conservatives are neglecting that continuum, that connection that we are to have with each other, in favor of “hyper-individualism”?  Is this a conflict between libertarianism and Burkean, that is, cultural conservatism?  Can they be reconciled?

"This reply is evidence that this conversation really needs to end. You are confronted with ..."

Ignorance about Christianity
"That you can find similarities between thoughts across centuries is not evidence that one set ..."

Ignorance about Christianity
"That persons might hold differing moralities does not prove as" fact" that morality is merely ..."

Being Moral vs. Moralizing
"So, you're basing your statement on hearsay."

Millennials Don’t Know About Extermination Camps

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment