Supreme Court upholds Obamacare

Supreme Court upholds Obamacare June 26, 2015

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Obamacare, saying that the language of a  passage in the Affordable Care Act that limited subsidies to states that established insurance exchanges should not be allowed to undermine the larger purpose of the bill.

“In this instance,” wrote Chief Justice Roberts, “the context and structure of the act compel us to depart from what would otherwise be the most natural reading of the pertinent statutory phrase.”  Dissenting Justice Scalia said,   “We should start calling this law SCOTUScare,” citing the two decisions supporting the health care law, which “will publish forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes to uphold and assist its favorites.”

Responded President Obama to his victory, “The Affordable Care Act is here to stay.”

From Robert Barnes, Affordable Care Act survives Supreme Court challenge – The Washington Post:

The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a key provision of the Affordable Care Act and in a broadly written opinion agreed with the Obama administration that government subsidies that make health insurance affordable for millions of Americans should be available to all who qualify.

By a 6-to-3 vote, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. reaffirmed the foundation of President Obama’s landmark domestic achievement and seemed to take the starch out of legal efforts to undermine the basic structure of the law. The ruling endorsed the administration’s view that subsidies should be available for all low- and moderate-income Americans wherever they live, not just in states that have set up their own health insurance exchanges.

The decision was broad enough that Obama claimed in a Rose Garden speech: “The Affordable Care Act is here to stay.”

[Keep reading. . .]

"Related to my earlier comment, the graphic for this post has less and less explanatory ..."

The Revolt of the Center?
"The question is what is the nature of attraction, not the pastoral care practice."

Methodists Gone Wild
"I was in agreement with this post until the subject of DJT came up. He ..."

The Revolt of the Center?
"I would reiterate and agree with Steve's comment below. Yes all we do, think and ..."

Methodists Gone Wild

Browse Our Archives