“There are not two sides.”

“There are not two sides.” July 3, 2015

As the nation’s media openly joined in the celebrations of the Supreme Court’s decision on gay marriage, some are saying, as we blogged about, that they will not cover opposition to the issue anymore.  Ben Smith, editor-in-chief of Buzzfeed, said this:

“We firmly believe that for a number of issues, including civil rights, women’s rights, anti-racism, and LGBT equality, there are not two sides.”

You have GOT to read Federalist editor Mollie Hemingway’s evisceration of this attitude, linked after the jump.

Read it all:   Mollie Hemingway, BuzzFeed’s Journalistic Struggles On Same-Sex Marriage, In GIFs, The Federalist.  Sample:

What would it even mean to say that there are not two sides on an issue that was literally just decided on a 5-4 vote? How does BuzzFeed explain to its readers what that number four represents?

 

 

"I don't mind the GOP of Eisenhower or Taft but they'd be described as far-right ..."

The Revolt of the Center?
"You are not going back far enough. There was a far different GOP that you ..."

The Revolt of the Center?
"If "woke progressivism" is "craziness", the sane alternative is not that the reactionary opposite side ..."

Are We Turning Away from the ..."
"Do "correct pronouns" even exist any more. I mean there may be a person's preferred ..."

Are We Turning Away from the ..."

Browse Our Archives