A new video released by the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) appears to show how Planned Parenthood uses accounting gimmicks to hide profits created through the sale of body parts of aborted babies.
A financial benefit โis what staff and management need to see,โ says an executive at a Planned Parenthood facility in Texas.
The video highlights footage from the April 9, 2015 visit of investigative journalists David Daleiden โ director of the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) โ and CMP employee Sandra Merritt to Planned Parenthood Gulf Coastโs (PPGC) abortion facility in Houston.
โWe had two levels of invoicing for them. We had it worded as โper consent,โโ explains PPGC Director of Research Melissa Farrell. In the video, Farrell states โper consentโ is the phrase used in PPGC budgeting in place of โper specimenโ for fetal tissue.
Farrell discusses that while a woman may consent to supply her aborted babyโs tissue, the specimen itself may not be useable for experimentation.
โThereโs probably some situations where somebody would consent and then just not, we didnโt get a sample, or she changed her mind, or something happened to the specimen,โ she says, adding, โNow obviously, we donโt want to end up paying for material that we canโt use,โ and suggests that there be a line item fee or โsomething else that represents the specimens.โ
โI just donโt want it to turn into a situation that is not financially beneficial for you,โ says Merritt.
โYeah, yeah. And weโll, Iโll take you up on that. Iโll take you up on that. Iโll take you up on that,โ Farrell repeats, laughing. โWe definitely want to do that, because thatโs what staff and management need to see.โ
PPGC CEO Melaney Linton also appears in the video advising that Farrell will โwork on all of that with youโ when it comes to โremunerationโ and โcompensationโ for fetal tssue.
Farrell explains to Daleiden and Merritt over lunch that her department โ which has overseen the organizationโs fetal tissue supply program since 2006 โ โcontributes so much to the bottom line of our organization here.โ
[Keep reading. . .]ย
The link also gives the video-makersโ response to their indictment, as well as more context of the shady legal maneuvering of Planned Parenthood with the grand jury.ย Here is a statement from Peter Breen of the Thomas More Society, which is defending Daleiden and Merritt:
The charges against David Daleiden are legally and factually baseless. David used standard undercover journalism techniques to catch Planned Parenthood staff agreeing to alter abortion procedures to get more intact organs and tissue from aborted babies, presumably without telling their patients. David also caught Planned Parenthood staff discussing how to adjust accounting line items to conceal profits from baby body part transactions. Planned Parenthoodโs lawyers in Houston have now admitted they dreamed up and demanded the charges against David, apparently in order to distract prosecutors and the public from their own bad acts. We intend to seek to have these charges dismissed at the earliest opportunity.