Exposing the forgery about Jesus’s wife

Exposing the forgery about Jesus’s wife June 27, 2016

The Atlantic has published a piece of investigative journalism on the source of the manuscript fragment that has Jesus referring to “my wife.”  Though heralded by Harvard professor Karen King, other scholars have argued from internal evidence that the fragment is a forgery.   This article pretty much finishes off any possibility that it is authentic by exposing the man who first came up with the manuscript–an expert in ancient manuscripts, a pornographer, and a New Age gnostic, with a very shady record–and the scholar who wrote about it without ever bothering to check on where the fragment came from.

From Ariel Sabar,  Did Jesus Have a Wife? – The Atlantic:

On a humid afternoon this past November, I pulled off Interstate 75 into a stretch of Florida pine forest tangled with runaway vines. My GPS was homing in on the house of a man I thought might hold the master key to one of the strangest scholarly mysteries in recent decades: a 1,300-year-old scrap of papyrus that bore the phrase “Jesus said to them, My wife.” The fragment, written in the ancient language of Coptic, had set off shock waves when an eminent Harvard historian of early Christianity, Karen L. King, presented it in September 2012 at a conference in Rome.

Never before had an ancient manuscript alluded to Jesus’s being married. The papyrus’s lines were incomplete, but they seemed to describe a dialogue between Jesus and the apostles over whether his “wife”—possibly Mary Magdalene—was “worthy” of discipleship. Its main point, King argued, was that “women who are wives and mothers can be Jesus’s disciples.” She thought the passage likely figured into ancient debates over whether “marriage or celibacy [was] the ideal mode of Christian life” and, ultimately, whether a person could be both sexual and holy.

King called the business-card-size papyrus “The Gospel of Jesus’s Wife.” But even without that provocative title, it would have shaken the world of biblical scholarship.

[Keep reading. . .]

HT:  Grant Kaplan, whose discussion you should also read.

"Only in their very recent history. It was essentially a civil war. Much like China's ..."

DISCUSS: Our Approach to Foreign Policy
"Wait. Weren't the North and the South separate, sovereign nations at the time? And didn't ..."

DISCUSS: Our Approach to Foreign Policy
"OK. But it's not ALL of his response."

DISCUSS: Our Approach to Foreign Policy
"Yes, this is how we view it today. And it may even be correct, given ..."

DISCUSS: Our Approach to Foreign Policy

Browse Our Archives