The “throw away your vote” fallacy

The “throw away your vote” fallacy

If you vote for a third party or an independent candidate, some say, you are throwing away your vote.

So your vote has meaning only if you vote for someone who could win?  That makes no sense to me.

Why should our choices be limited to the nominees of the two major parties?  If we must vote for one of them, even if we don’t want either one, then our political liberty is severely restricted.  Voting for someone you don’t want violates the whole point of voting, which has to do with the consent of the governed and the people’s right to choose their own rulers.  If your vote is against your choosing, then you have indeed wasted your vote.

I suppose what people mean by “wasting their vote” if they cast their ballot for someone who is not a Democrat or a Republican is that they want to participate in the horse race of the election, wanting their vote to contribute to the final outcome of who comes out on top.

But elections are not games and voting is not a sporting event.

Vote for the candidate that you want to hold the office.  That’s the only way, in a Democratic Republic, for your vote to be meaningful.

 

 

"Of course, the most serious existential crisis is one where you question whether you actually ..."

A Third of Americans Are Having ..."
""The one-third of Americans and the one-half of young Americans who are struggling with an ..."

A Third of Americans Are Having ..."
"I wouldn't use the word "settled." I'd prefer the term "consensual." The former suggests some ..."

There Is No Scientific Consensus in ..."
"Yes. Also, significantly, that it takes a (empirically superior) paradigm to kill a prevailing paradigm. ..."

There Is No Scientific Consensus in ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the main Christian church in Greece?

Select your answer to see how you score.