From the twitter feed, #2, “legal Dreamers”

This is a very short item but something I came across the other day that was entirely new to me.  The “Dreamers,” we are told, are in need of legal residency in the United States because they left the countries of their birth so long ago that those places are wholly unfamiliar to them, including language and school system.  But there’s another category of individuals in the same circumstance:  sons and daughters of people who came here on H-1B visas.

What I was unaware of is that, as much as one reads about H-1B visa abuse, it’s actually very difficult to move from such a visa to a green card, simply because such a small percentage of the overall visas available in a given year, are designated for this purpose.  As Cato explains,

Current law allows H-1B employers to sponsor H-1B workers, their spouses, and minor children for green cards or legal permanent residency. The green card waits for these workers are decades long (see here for a detailed explanation of that problem), so the law also allows H-1Bs waiting for a green card to extend their status and the status of their spouses and minor children indefinitely while they all wait for green cards. But despite having waited in line for many years, children of H-1B workers still lose their status as soon as they turn 21. Those who don’t self-deport then become foreign students, which provides temporary status but they cannot work and lose status again as soon as they graduate.

Which means that, if “Dreamers” — the children of illegal immigrants — are given residency but this group is not, then there is a clear rewarding of illegal actions vs. trying to follow the rules, and a clear hypocrisy, since the same rationale that applies to the “Dreamers” also applies to the sons and daughters of H-1B prospective-green card immigrants.  On the other hand, if you say, “they knew what they were getting into and shouldn’t have any reason to expect to gain residency,” then that’s no different than similar statements about long-term illegal residents, except that the former are at least waiting in a line that they had reasonable grounds to expect to make it through.  There’s much more at the link and, though Cato had a clear bias in favor of open borders, I don’t think they’re making up this issue.



"Cupich brings to mind my long-held feeling that many Catholic clergy,even at the highest levels, ..."

Does God maybe not care so ..."
"Because not all crimes are equal, so not all punishments are equal. Someone who got ..."

Is a life sentence for child ..."
"He probably didn't even rape the child in question. These bigots just don't understand that ..."

Is a life sentence for child ..."
"To the extent you are right, it mitigates in favor of much longer statutory sentences. ..."

Is a life sentence for child ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment