An Intimate Dinner with Billy and Betty (On the Side)

I was a high school sophomore when someone told me that in China, aborted fetuses were considered a delicacy.

I thought they were lying. 

I still think they were lying. 

I had seen a spider consume its prey, the hapless insect rolled in a silken web.  I had seen our cat consume the placenta, after giving birth to a litter of kittens.  But we humans—advanced beings made in the image and likeness of God, and upon whose hearts natural law had been inscribed—do not eat other humans. 

Oh, I had read far-fetched adventure stories in which cannibals fired up a big stew pot full of missionaries.  In that rare case, I thought, the imaginary antagonists—deviant and uncivilized—were driven by pokeweed or some jungle elixir to engage in a grotesque religious ritual.  It would never really happen.

But what do I know?  This week Oklahoma State Senator Ralph Shortley introduced  S.B. 1418, a bill in the Oklahoma legislature that prohibits the manufacture or sale of

“food or any other product intended for human consumption which contains aborted human fetuses in the ingredients or which used aborted human fetuses in the ingredients or which used aborted human fetuses in the research or development of any of the ingredients.”

This would seem to be a completely unnecessary bill.  Surely, NO ONE would ever do this! 

But a stomach-turning 1995 article in the Hong Kong Eastern Express reported on hospitals which routinely sold aborted fetuses as “health food.”

And Shortley’s bill follows on the heels of recent reports that a San Diego-based research and development company, Senomyx, is conducting flavor enhancement research with HEK293, a cell line which has become a staple in biochemistry labs, and which was originally derived from human embryonic kidney cells.  Among Senomyx’s clients are major corporations such as Nestle, Campbell’s Soup, Kraft Foods and PepsiCo, which market common food products such as Pepsi and GatorAde. 

Shortley doesn’t know whether or not human embryos have been used in the state of Oklahoma.  He told Tulsa-based KRMG Radio, “I don’t know if it is happening in Oklahoma; it may be, or it may not be.  What I am saying is that if it does happen, then we are not going to allow it to manufacture here.”

Hitler’s SS troups did, according to reports, fashion the skin of murdered Jews into lampshades. 

I am reminded of the old radio drama “The Shadow” and its creepy theme:  “What evil lurks in the hearts of man.” 

Lord, have mercy.

The Sound of Silence: Be Still, and Know That I Am God

I have this neat trick that I can do.  Sometimes I lie in bed at night and feel my brain.  That is, I experience an idea as a physical entity, leaping from left to right, pounding against my skull from the inside.  An action potential in the central nervous system:  calcium ions firing, neuro-transmitters leaping across synaptic gaps, linking the present day with a far distant memory, giving rise to new, never-before-considered solutions to the day’s problems.

This cranial super-awareness is not something that came naturally to me.  In fact it took me something like half a century to become so familiar with my brain’s self-indulgent rampages, to understand the ebb and flow of feelings and ideas and emotions so fully, that I could accompany a neuron on its frenzied path, coursing through the hippocampus from left to right, replacing one ersatz thought with its logical superior.

How did I do it?

Silence. Silence. Silence.

Turning off the TV and the radio, closing the car windows, closing my office door.  The pulsating excesses of laughter, of earnest debate, of laugh tracks and pop music and car horns—all have their appointed time.  But I find that nowadays what I need is time, great gobs of time, to spend with myself.  Just me, myself, and I.

In that small, still world of the self, I can reflect on the cosmos, imagine the future, grab and squeeze a word until it’s tranquilized on paper.  I can experience God’s dynamic presence.

I think that’s what Pope Benedict is talking about in his just-released message for the 40th Annual World Day for Social Communications.  “Learning to communicate,” he writes, “is learning to listen and contemplate as well as speak.”  The world reacted with surprise to his message, entitled Silence and Word: Path of Evangelization; but on second thought, we all see the wisdom in his words.  When modern communication makes so much information available, when we can idle away our hours on Facebook and Twitter and Google+, we must stoke the furnace with periods of grace-filled quiet.

The Pope reminds us:

“…people today are frequently bombarded with answers to questions they have never asked and to needs of which they were unaware. If we are to recognize and focus upon the truly important questions, then silence is a precious commodity that enables us to exercise proper discernment in the face of the surcharge of stimuli and data that we receive.”

“Preach the Gospel always,” said Francis of Assisi. “And when necessary, use words.”

*   *   *   *

In keeping with tradition, the papal message for the World Day of Social Communications is released four months early on January 24, the feast of St. Francis de Sales, patron of journalists. 

The 2012 World Day for Social Communications will be held on May 20.

De-Baptism: Is That Even Possible?

Increasing numbers of Europeans are asking to be “de-baptized,” says a report in the Huffington Post, and Church officials are concerned.

Say what?  Doesn’t Baptism change you ontologically, leaving an indelible mark on your soul, just as ordination does for the priest?

Well, yes.  No matter how hard you scrub, you really can’t wash that mark off. 

But apparently, people—lots of people!—are trying.  Some estimate the number of “de-baptisms” requested in Europe has reached the tens of thousands.  Both Protestant and Catholic churches have been affected.

There are different reasons: 

  • Financial Incentives – In countries like Germany, Austria and Belgium, governments levy “church taxes”; and if non-practicing Catholics claim to be “de-baptized,” they will get to keep the share of their taxes that has been levied for the Church.
  • Anger Over the Church Sex Scandals – In Belgium, which has been deeply affected by the scandal of clergy sex abuse, the Brussels Federation of Friends of Secular Morality reports that there has been a sharp increase in the number of requests—with more than 2,000 people requesting “de-baptism” in 2010 in the French-speaking region of Belgium alone.
  • Secularism – As many Europeans have turned away from the church, some want their disbelief to be officially recognized.

A case pending in Normandy, France, involves Rene Lebouvier, a 71-year-old retiree from Fleury, near the D-Day beaches.  Lebouvier was raised by devout Catholic parents, attending Catholic schools and even considering the priesthood.  As the years passed, however, Lebouvier fell away—eventually completely losing his faith in God.  About ten years ago, Lebouvier contacted the parish where he was born, and requested that his name be removed from their baptismal records.  The parish, in response, wrote a note in the margin, indicating that he had removed himself from membership.  However, this was not satisfactory for the atheist Lebouvier; he filed suit, asking that the church remove all evidence of his ever having been initiated into the Catholic religion.  The case is currently working its way through the French courts.

In Britain, tens of thousands of people downloaded a “de-baptism certificate” offered as a joke by the National Secular Society.

In countries like Germany, Austria and Belgium, the cost to the Church may be severe.  Governments of those countries levy “church taxes”; and if non-practicing Catholics claim to be “de-baptized,” the churches will see a decline in tax benefits.

But more important than the financial hardship, the “de-baptism” craze warns of an increased secularism throughout the Continent.  In Germany, some 181,000 Catholics left the Catholic Church in 2011.  (Rather than seeking “de-baptism,” German citizens simply complete government paperwork indicating that they no longer wish to pay church taxes.)

Adding to the Church’s concern for souls is a decline in the number of children who are baptized in infancy.  Fifty years ago, more than 90 percent of French children were baptized; today, roughly one in three receives the sacrament.

Focusing on the positive, some Catholics rejoice at the reduction in merely cultural Christianity, noting that those who want to be Christian really do believe in the Gospel of Christ.

I invited my husband, Deacon Jerry Schiffer, to comment on the “de-baptism” phenomenon.  Here is his reflection.

 Have You Ever Wished You’d Never Been Born?

A reflection by Deacon Jerry Schiffer

Encountering some of life’s more trying moments, many of us have heard (and maybe even used) the phrase “I wish I’d never been born!” I’m sure those words are not always intended to be taken literally, and yet, I’m just as sure that at times they are. While one may be uncertain of the intent of the words, one can be certain that using them cannot and will not change the circumstances or reality of one’s birth.

The same is true of baptism.

In certain parts of the world, individuals are now seeking to relieve themselves of the “burden” of ever having been baptized. At least, that is the idea that has been adopted in areas of an increasingly secularized Europe.

Many who are unhappy with their traditional initiation into the church of their parent’s choice – Catholic and Protestant alike – are apparently seeking to be “unbaptized.” A notation next to their names in church records that they have officially renounced their faith is apparently not enough. Only removal of their names from the records – a denial that the baptism had ever even occurred – will satisfy some of those who are unhappy with any connection with a church.

Fueling this anti-baptism mind-set are several factors: unhappiness with the child abuse scandals of recent years, a general rejection of religion and/or belief in God, and taxes that are levied by some European countries for the support of churches. While it is true that some advocates of “unbaptism” are no longer believers and wish to be totally “disassociated” from the church of their baptism for that reason, others remain believers but want no association with a formal church. (For more on this phenomen, click here.)

Whatever the desire of the individual seeking to be “unbaptized’” the truth must still prevail. Even a court-ordered removal of a person’s name from a church’s baptism records cannot remove the reality of that event any more than an official of Iran can erase the reality of the holocaust by saying that it never happened.

The fact is that the baptism really occurred. Those repudiating their baptisms can say “I wish I was never re-born” all they want. Wishing, however, will not make it so.” They can, however, renounce their faith and they may even be able to convince a court to require that their baptism be removed from church records.

The true tragedy in all of this is not the denial of the baptism’s existence, but the denial of its meaning – a denial of the eternal relationship, the spiritual re-birth that each baptism offers to the person receiving the sacrament. Let us pray for our brothers and sisters who have not seen this truth.