Dear Dr. Küng: DON’T DO IT!

Swiss theologian Hans Küng may be about to commit suicide.

Since the Second Vatican Council, Küng has been fighting against the Catholic Church’s teachings—arguing for a married priesthood, a decentralized church, and birth control.  When he stubbornly challenged the idea of papal infallibility in 1979, the Vatican stripped him of his license to teach Catholic theology.  He was named professor of ecumenical studies by the University of Tübingen, and has continued to self-identify as a “Catholic priest in good standing”, even while publishing books and articles which conflict with the teaching of the Church.

Now, though, the dissident theologian seems to be on the verge of the greatest rebellion yet:  Suffering from Parkinson’s disease, he is considering ending his life by suicide, rather than waiting until his body declines into illness, pain or dementia.

The real issue, though—as with many of us—seems to be Pride.  Küng is losing his eyesight and his ability to write books by hand, as has been his custom.  Rather than understanding that he has dignity as a child of God, he seems to feel that it is his ability to write, to teach, that is the measure of his worth.  “How much longer will my life be liveable in dignity?” he worries.  “A scholar who can no longer read and write – what’s next?”

In an interview published this week, Küng insists, “I do not want to be a shadow of myself.  I also don’t want to be sent off to a nursing home.  If I have to decide for myself, please abide by my wish.”

The weakening professor has said that he doesn’t want to go to an assisted suicide center, which he calls “sad and bleak”, but would prefer to stay in his home at Tübingen in the company of his closest colleagues.

Küng argues that no one must suffer the unbearable as something sent from God.  “People can decide this for themselves,” he wrote, “and no priest, doctor or judge can stop them.”  He considers assisted suicide not murder, but rather a “surrendering of life” or a “return of life to the hands of the Creator.”

The Catholic Church strongly disagrees.  

The Church teaches that all persons are created in the image and likeness of God; and it is this divine spark, this mirroring of the Creator, which imbues dignity for all persons, even the most infirm or humble.  And to knowingly take a life, even one’s own, is to directly interfere with the plan of God, and is mortally sinful.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church explains the clear teaching which respects life, from the moment of conception to the moment of natural death.  Part III, Section 2, on the Ten Commandments, explains:


2280 Everyone is responsible for his life before God who has given it to him. It is God who remains the sovereign Master of life. We are obliged to accept life gratefully and preserve it for his honor and the salvation of our souls. We are stewards, not owners, of the life God has entrusted to us. It is not ours to dispose of.

2281 Suicide contradicts the natural inclination of the human being to preserve and perpetuate his life. It is gravely contrary to the just love of self. It likewise offends love of neighbor because it unjustly breaks the ties of solidarity with family, nation, and other human societies to which we continue to have obligations. Suicide is contrary to love for the living God.

2282 If suicide is committed with the intention of setting an example, especially to the young, it also takes on the gravity of scandal. Voluntary co-operation in suicide is contrary to the moral law.

Grave psychological disturbances, anguish, or grave fear of hardship, suffering, or torture can diminish the responsibility of the one committing suicide.

2283 We should not despair of the eternal salvation of persons who have taken their own lives. By ways known to him alone, God can provide the opportunity for salutary repentance. The Church prays for persons who have taken their own lives.

Please join with me in praying for Mr. Küng—that God will grant him the strength to endure the illness which marks this final stage of his life, and the wisdom to return to full communion with the Catholic Church and to fully embrace its teachings.  When the time arrives and he leaves this earth, may God look with love upon this struggling servant, and welcome him into His kingdom.

And you may be interested in my post on the U.S. Bishops’ 2011 statement on assisted suicide, and on the death of the notorious “Dr. Death”, here.

"I'll follow you over Kathy. I was probably in more sympathy with your point of ..."

Parting Is Such Sweet Sorrow…. My ..."
"If you're at all interested in knowing . . . the Catholic Dogma . . ..."

Parting Is Such Sweet Sorrow…. My ..."
"Thank you, Mrs. Harris! Christmas blessings to you. I hope to see you over at ..."

Parting Is Such Sweet Sorrow…. My ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • They have in Swtzerland an “assisted suicide center?” Sounds like a Nazi version of a YMCA. Sometimes i prefer to live my life in blissful ignorance.

    • moseynon

      Although assisted suicide has long been legal in Switzerland, the clinic (Dignitas) has existed for only 15 years. It has generated controversy within the country because it attracts many foreigners, so-called “suicide tourists.” The clinic is unmarked, nondescript, and its address is not given to the….erm… victims until a few hours before the appointment. Even then, the location is vague enough that taxi drivers have to circle the area several times.

      However, because assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland (as it is in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg,) Prof. Küng would not need to use the clinic. If he decides to travel to Switzerland to end his life,he would go to his hometown of Sursee. But, as Kathy mentioned, his preference is to die in Tübingen, Germany where he has taught for so many years.

      • Thanks. Brave new world. I’m sure they’ll be in the US in a dozen years.

        • moseynon

          Manny, you may be right. I know of three states (Oregon, Washington and Vermont) which allow assisted suicide. All three allow the victim to die at home.

          However, I am not sure if there are safeguards in place to keep residents of other states from traveling there for the purpose of dying. A clinic would facilitate “suicide tourism,” much as the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland draws people from around the world. However, given the controversial nature of assisted suicide, even where legal, I suspect the existence of such a clinic would only be known about by word of mouth.

  • NoamJomsky

    We pray that he does not kill himself, as this would be a mortal sin against the fifth commandment.
    CCC 1861: “Mortal sin is a radical possibility of human freedom, as is love itself. It results in the loss of charity and the privation of sanctifying grace, that is, of the state of grace. If it is not redeemed by repentance and God’s forgiveness, it causes exclusion from Christ’s kingdom and the eternal death of hell, for our freedom has the power to make choices for ever, with no turning back. However, although we can judge that an act is in itself a grave offense, we must entrust judgment of persons to the justice and mercy of God.”

  • ForPeteSaiche

    Life is worth living, no matter how humbled.

  • Mary E.

    Thank you for the reminder, Kathy. Because of Dr. Kueng’s long history of dissent against the Church’s teachings, it’s easy to “write him off,” but we should be praying for him instead.

  • kbrigan

    The word “dignity” has mutated into code for “our handy excuse for murdering disabled people.” Reason #1 for why this guy should not kill himself is because by doing so, he’d be helping to usher in the next holocaust — the one against the disabled, fat people, old people, ugly people, inconvenient people…

  • kbrigan

    What makes him think he has “dignity” now? If you dumped him in the middle of a forest and made him fend for himself without technology, he’d probably be bear food in less than a day. Does that mean he’s worthless because he’s “dependent” upon central heating and paved roads and grocery stores instead of feeding tubes and care-givers? And, even if he’s not (yet) in diapers, doesn’t he poop and fart and do all sorts of “undignified” things already? Sounds like he (and the rest of the “dignity” crowd) are in denial about the truths of human existence. All it would take to reduce them to “pathetic” and “helpless” would be to deny them water for a couple days. Hardly a paragon of “independence” or “dignify” when not having access to merely a single chemical compound would turn one into a raving, powerless wretch. So, tell me again, Mr. K, how your oh-so-fancy schmanzy “scholar’s existence” is anything for anyone to be particularly impressed by? If a disabled person with a feeding tube and a 70 IQ is somehow “undignified” what makes you think you aren’t, too, already, even with all your book learning? You really think that makes someone more worthy of life?

  • Rich Horton

    Just a point of clarification: The celibate priesthood is not a “Church teaching,” it is an ecclesiastical rule. Such rules can be changed without altering the faith an iota. (Which is why we have some married Catholic priests today who come from rites that traditionally allowed married priests, but who are still in full communion with the Catholic Church.)