Abstract Science

Michael Hanby (No God, No Science? 31) makes the arresting claim that “the equation of abstraction with the movement from particular to general” is “not ontologically innocent.” It instead “reflects the deep-seated mechanistic assumption that the ‘parts’ of reality are ontologically prior to the whole of it, with the latter being merely the aggregation of the former and the result of their history of interaction.” 

This is not how the world is: “in the actual world, the existence of each thing is characterized by a near infinity of relations which help to constitute it.”

When we start from this concrete existential condition, then abstract is what it was for Aristotle and Thomas: Not a move from particular to general, but an isolation “in thought” of what “actually belongs together in reality: form and matter, parts and wholes, a thing and the context which is the presupposition of its flourishing.” On this view, experimentation is an effort to dissociate what is normally associated, and thus a form of abstraction.

"John 1:14-1614 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld ..."

Canon and Church
"something like that, besides why would you want to teach any thing, but good things, ..."

Canon and Church
"You are your own judge, God is the only one who can dish out judgement, ..."

Canon and Church
"You do not even know what The Word is. John describes The Word as pre-existing ..."

Canon and Church

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!