Recently, I was invited to be on a Christian radio talk show, and told that I was to explain to the listening audience why the mainstream press was trying to destroy the Narnia movie. The hosts’ leading question implied that the primary response of the mainstream press to the Narnia movie was negative, and that the chief complaint had to do with special effects.
When I asked for the source of their information, all they could offer was TIME Magazine.
Basically, when I got on the radio what I said was, “You’re wrong.”
Well, sure, a few mainstream soreheads are unfairly criticizing the film, yes. But look at the Rotten Tomatoes board. Look at Metacritic.com. The majority have offered overwhelmingly positive reviews.
It’s the Christian press, actually, who are mixing their reviews with some serious questions about Adamson’s creative decisions. (And yes, I’m one of them, even though I still rate the film at a strong “B+”.)
It’s depressing how quickly many Christians will overreact to the slightest provocation, and start crying about being persecuted. Folks, Christian peacemakers held hostage in Iraq… that’s persecution. Polly Toynbee’s hateful and irrational rant against the Christian faith in The Guardian, that’s dismaying prejudice. But some criticism of sub-standard CGI?
The positive response to the Narnia film is reason to rejoice—it’s a pretty good movie! Not a great movie. Not a groundbreaking mind-blower. But a good, whimsical, entertaining, colorful, sometimes enchanting movie. It deserves praise, and it’s getting praise, even from secular journalists who know about Lewis’s Christian faith. That’s remarkable.
So, to show that it’s not just me…
Here’s this week’s Film Forum, with a generous sampling of positive-but-critical Narnia reviews by Christian film critics. (And isn’t that their job? To be ruthlessly critical, celebrating what is excellent, “testing all things” and “holding fast to what is good,” to borrow a phrase from First Thessalonians?)
Syriana also gets a couple of responses.