Updates on Paul Thomas Anderson and Brett Ratner projects

THERE WILL BE DANIEL DAY-LEWIS!
While the list of films I cannot wait to see in 2006 has grown rather large, none of them match my eagerness for the next Paul Thomas Anderson film — There Will Be Blood. So any news about the next film from the director of Punch-drunk Love and Magnolia makes me lean very close to the screen to make sure I don’t miss a detail.

Cinematical grabbed my attention today with a link to a (very poorly written) story about the script that’s short on detail but long on enthusiasm. It also has the first bare-bones description of what the film is about…

The film concerns a man named Daniel, an oil prospector in the early 1900′s. His quest to find and extract oil leads him on a rather confounded path lined with madness. The crux of the story revolves around a small community of people, namely a poor downtrodden religious family the Sundays, and their involvement in Daniel’s agenda. It is here that Daniel interfaces with his counterpart, the Sunday’s second-eldest son: a young preacher of ‘God’s word’ whose abnormal evangelical style has made him a local celebrity. Both Daniel and Eli Sunday are looking to ‘mine’ a commodity deemed invaluable: one for oil, the other-faith. The two are on a collision course that can only be resolved in blood. The truths of this story, for me anyway, revolve around man’s eventual need to address the widening gap between reality and superstition. This script speaks volumes about the dangers inherent to nihilism as well as blind faith.

RATNER SECOND-RATES HIMSELF
Meanwhile, Brett Ratner is sending mixed messages about his X-Men three-quel. He’s attacking people who are making premature judgments that the film will be a disaster. But he’s also talking about how Bryan Singer, who directed the first two, is “better at it” than he is. I do think that it will be hard to beat Singer’s fantastic work in X-Men and X-Men 2, but come on, man… if you want to squash negative rumors, don’t go around talking about how other directors could do a better job than you!

I sat next to Ratner on the X3 set for a while a few months ago, and I haven’t commented on my impressions because I’m still grateful for the opportunity I had to go behind the scenes. But I will comment, when it comes time to run a review. For now I’ll just say that it’s very interesting watching people jump to huge conclusions about the finished film before the film is even finished, their pronouncements based entirely on a few photographs.

And it’s also strange how different an exciting scene revealed in the preview looks if you were there to see how the shot was put together…


It’s hard to block out all of the stuff you know that’s just outside the frame… like the head honchos who were off to the side arguing about the difference between “John Hurt” and “John Heard.”

I’ll admit, I haven’t been a fan of Ratner’s previous films. But it’s far too early to judge his work on this film, unless you’ve been there working with him and watching early cuts. I and all X-men fans should be rooting for him. If the fans revolt early, who’s to say he won’t lose his enthusiasm for the project and do less than his his best?

Ignore the hasty reviews, Brett. Show us you’ve got a great action film in you! The best answer to nasty pre-reviews is to prove them wrong with something awesome.

  • Facebook
About Jeffrey Overstreet

Jeffrey Overstreet is the author of a “memoir of dangerous moviegoing” called Through a Screen Darkly, and a four-volume series of fantasy novels called The Auralia Thread, which includes Auralia’s Colors, Cyndere’s Midnight, Raven’s Ladder, and The Ale Boy’s Feast. Jeffrey is a contributing editor for Seattle Pacific University’s Response magazine, and he writes about art, faith, and culture for Image, Filmwell, and his own website, LookingCloser.org. His work has also appeared in Paste, Relevant, Books and Culture, and Christianity Today (where he was a film columnist and critic for almost a decade). He lives in Shoreline, Washington. Visit him on Facebook at facebook.com/jeffreyoverstreethq.

  • Bob Lewis (Philly)

    This CD is a very pleasant surprise indeed! Spiritual, intelligent, meditative and wonderfully produced. I love it and it gets better with each listen!!! If you don’t have it, buy it now!

  • Anonymous

    I concur with the positive assessments here. I’m grateful for yours, Josh Hurst’s, and Andy Whitman’s praise of this CD. Without it, I think I would’ve bypassed this one at the record store.

  • Deep Furrows

    I used to love Graceland. Then my six-year old son said, “I don’t want to listen to the Lion King.”

  • Rick R

    I couldn’t agree with you more, Jeffrey. I’ve done nothing but play this over and over in the car. My daughter (4 years old) was even humming Outrageous this afternoon. It was really nice to be able to point out some of Simon’s lyrics in that song and ask her “who’s gonna love you when your looks are gone?” God will. Kinda cool to be able to explain God’s love using lyrics from a Paul Simon song.

    An album like this is strong for so many reasons. The variety of music, the wonderful lyrics, Eno’s contribution, the elements of spirituality…you name it, he hit a homerun with this one.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X