Nature Fails to Obey the Sacred Models of Consensus Science

Twenty-year hiatus in rising temperatures has climate scientists puzzled

The fact that global surface temperatures have not followed the expected global warming pattern is now widely accepted. Picture:

DEBATE about the reality of a two-decade pause in global warming and what it means has made its way from the sceptical fringe to the mainstream.

In a lengthy article this week, The Economist magazine said if climate scientists were credit-rating agencies, then climate sensitivity – the way climate reacts to changes in carbon-dioxide levels – would be on negative watch but not yet downgraded.

***

Research by Ed Hawkins of University of Reading shows surface temperatures since 2005 are already at the low end of the range projections derived from 20 climate models and if they remain flat, they will fall outside the models’ range within a few years.

“The global temperature standstill shows that climate models are diverging from observations,” says David Whitehouse of the Global Warming Policy Foundation.

“If we have not passed it already, we are on the threshold of global observations becoming incompatible with the consensus theory of climate change,” he says.

Mike Flynn blasphemously provides whimsical commentary from Ouside the Consensus Bubble.

"Thanks for the reply. I've been pondering my motivations recently. I tell myself I'm trying ..."

Conservatives’ Stupidest Cause Célèbre
"Oh llithid, where to begin?Our model of marriage is the Holy Trinity. God clearly wants ..."

Conservatives’ Stupidest Cause Célèbre
"What you hear when you read the above comment may or may not be what ..."

Conservatives’ Stupidest Cause Célèbre
""Be Christ’s disciple or you shall most assuredly be another man’s slave. And the more ..."

Stephen Binz has a cool bunch ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment