Gateways to Paganism: Paul Huson’s “Mastering Witchcraft”

(Pagans don’t proselytize, and the majority of us don’t have Pagan parents; as a result, people come to Modern Paganism through various means. For many of us, books, movies, and music provided the impetus to walk the Pagan Path. Gateways to Paganism is one guy’s attempt to document some of the things that have led various people to Paganism, and why those things had that effect.)

Several months ago I was part of a Facebook discussion pertaining to what books should be included on an “Essential Pagan Reading List” being put together for the Huffington Post. Ultimately the list ended up with twenty-nine books*, and while it was interesting to read what books people thought were “essential,” it was far more interesting to read people’s thoughts on the books they thought were absolutely “non-essential.” In my mind, one of the most influential Pagan books of the last twenty years is Silver Ravenwolf’s To Ride a Silver Broomstick, and it was one I suggested for the HuffPo list.

You would have thought that I had suggested adding the Malleus Mallificarum to the list judging by some of the reactions. There are a lot of people in the Pagan Community who absolutely hate Broomstick and think that it gives Modern Witchcraft (and Paganism) a bad name. What I found interesting is that while Silver didn’t make the list, Paul Huson’s Mastering Witchcraft: A Practical Guide for Witches, Warlocks and Covens did. The eclecticism of Silver’s work apparently raised a lot of eyebrows, and yet a book that actively talks about “the black arts” slipped onto the list without a second thought.

The original cover of Mastering Witchcraft. You certainly don’t see “Warlock” in too many titles these days.

I’m sure there’s a generation or two who sees Mastering Witchcraft as a foundational text (much like people who came up in the 90′s see Broomstick), and perhaps rightfully so. While I’ve always taken published Pagan Ritual for granted, it didn’t really exist before 1970. Sure there were Witchcraft books out there; Gerald Gardner had two books in print by 1960, but they weren’t “how to” guides. Gardner’s books were garbled histories with hints, stories, and myths. They weren’t primers on how to put together a ritual in your living room. By the mid-60′s there were a few Witchcraft books out there chronicling some of the modern players on the scene, and a few spell-books, but still no ritual.

Huson’s book is an important part of Pagan History because it was the first (or one of the first) book that actually gave you enough material to construct an effective ritual that we might recognize today as “Pagan.” Sure, it’s not all completely spelled out like most books full of ritual are today but it’s all in there if you take the time to assemble the jig-saw puzzle. Huson opened the floodgates, and by the mid-70′s there were several (though still not very many) books of Pagan Ritual in print. Some of the more notable ones include Lady Sheba’s Book of Shadows (1971), Magical Rites from the Crystal Well by Ed Fitch (1971), and Raymond Buckland’s The Tree (1974).

While Mastering Witchcraft has just enough in it that it feels familiar, there’s also a lot in it that’s completely unfamiliar to the Modern Witch. Huson opens up his book with the Bible story of the Nephilim (or Watchers); fallen children of the god Yahweh, and traces the history of Witchcraft through their history and influence. While this sounds pretty odd to Pagans in 2012, books about Witchcraft in the 60′s and early 70′s (and in some instances even later than that) often mixed all sorts of magickal and religious traditions together. Anything “occult” was thrown into the same cauldron just to see what might bubble up. With only a handful of magickal texts easily available it wasn’t uncommon to see things from the realms of demonology, the Cabala, The Key of Solomon, and folk magick converge in the same place. The tradition written about by Huson is a textbook example of this.

In addition to the rather jumbled set of influences, this book is unfamiliar in a lot of other ways, most notably in how “dark” it is. Throughout the book Huson calls the reader a practitioner of the “black arts,” and warns that casting spells almost always leads to conflict. Huson’s “witchcraft” is often full of danger and doom, with people slinging spells at each other like it’s Hogwarts. If I was a Christian trying to undermine Modern Witchcraft, this is the book I would quote. When Huson describes a magician under siege hiding in her magic circle it’s like a nightmare come to life. If this had been my first Pagan book it probably would have scared me out of practicing The Craft.

Me and the cover of MW that I grew up with, I’ll never be a fan of that weird little devil on the bottom right hand corner.

While Huson writes about the reader’s “victims” and how witchcraft can be used as an aid in sexual conquest, it sometimes feels like he’s having a good laugh while going about it. Huson comes across as a confident enough chap that I’m not sure he needed to sprinkle people’s food with “love spells” back in 1969, but if that’s something you need, you’ll find it in MW. The book does contain several warnings about how black magic often backfires, though that doesn’t deter him from spending over half the book giving out advice on how to manipulate and attack others.

A lot of the magick in Mastering Witchcraft was familiar to me, but the deities (and other higher powers) called upon by Huson were not. One of the most referenced “deities” in the book is the demon Vassago. That’s right I said demon, a Prince of Hell, and commander of 26 demonic legions. Perhaps he’s helpful, but that’s not something I want to play with. Gods I’m familiar with like Cernunnos felt warped and extremely different from how I experience them. Cernunnos is not a phallic god and certainly not related to Lucifer the light-bringer, just implying those things made me cringe a little bit. His overall approach to deity was perplexing. He mentions goddesses, gods, and demons but offers little insight into them. I’ve always thought that it’s important to know “who you are calling” before dialing someone up on the phone. That attitude goes for deity as well.

Towards the end of the book Huson makes a snide remark about Gerald Gardner and his followers, calling them “witch cultists” and writing that the word “witch embraces a far wider circle of people than merely the followers of Gerald Brosseau Gardner.” I don’t disagree with Huson there, but I did found it odd that if Huson is writing about a Witchcraft different from Gardner’s why he ended up quoting a lot of Gardnarian-type material. Mastering Witchcraft contains the “Blessed Be’s” (“blessed be thy feet that have brought thee in these ways”) and while he doesn’t use Valiente’s Charge of the Goddess he does quote the Aradia version of it. He might be dismissive of “witch cultists” but he was obviously influenced by them.

Despite all of my problems with Mastering Witchcraft there was a lot in it I actually liked. Huson writes about magick in a way that makes it feel alive and real. The spells in this book leap off the page and into the subconscious; this isn’t a cookbook. Even when Huson suggests doing something as repugnant as reciting The Lord’s Prayer backwards, his rationale for doing so makes perfect sense**. As much as I wanted to cast this book into a dusty corner of Modern Pagan History I couldn’t quite do it, there’s valuable information here, and Huson writes about it with style and substance.

The 2006, and more benign, cover of MW.

Is this book “Essential Pagan Reading?” Certainly not, and I doubt Huson would have thought of it as “Pagan” (as we use the term today) back in 1970. However, it is an important book. It’s a time capsule to a different time in our history, when demons and gods shared the same pages, and Christian and European folk magicks were often woven together. As an influence upon a whole generation it’s easy to see why it’s long been a true gateway to Paganism.

* A number I feel is far too unwieldy. If I were making up a list of essential books it would contain no more than ten titles, but this isn’t about my feelings of said list.

**Oddly a lot of the doom and gloom goes away in the last chapter of the book The Coven and How to Form One, and the witchcraft Huson writes about instantly becomes far more recognizable and less threatening.

***Saying something to signify a new beginning isn’t a bad thing, I just would have chosen something else to say.

About Jason Mankey

Jason Mankey has been involved with Paganism for the last twenty years, and has spent the last ten of those years as a speaker, writer, and High Priest. Jason can often be found lecturing on the Pagan Festival circuit, so you might just bump into him. When not reading and researching Pagan history he likes to crank up the Led Zeppelin, do rituals in honor of Jim Morrison (of The Doors), and sing numerous praises to Pan, Dionysus, and Aphrodite. He lives in Sunnyvale CA with his wife Ari and two hyper-kinetic cats.

  • Peg Aloi

    Great piece, Jason. I’d be interested in that list of essential reading. I did a similar list-inspired article for Witchvox many years ago. Someone actually wrote a book on recommended reading for pagans some years ago…

    • Jason Mankey

      If that’s the one I’m thinking of it’s “The Well Read Witch.”

      I think “Essential lists” really depend on personal biases. If you want to be all inclusive the list has to be 29 books long, if you don’t think that’s effective, it can be a lot shorter.

  • P. Sufenas Virius Lupus

    Didn’t even know this book existed…but then again, this type of witchcraft has never been my strong suit.

    I do have to disagree with you on Cernunnos here, though, Jason. Being that almost everyone (including yourself) takes a far wider interpretation of what qualifies as Cernunnos than I would, one of the depictions included in that interpretation is one of the Val Camonica rock carvings that shows Cernunnos and/or a worshipper as ithyphallic. So…


    This was the first book on witchcraft I bought. I liked it. Repeating the Lord’s Prayer backwards is liberating, not repugnant for those looking to renounce their Christian upbringing.
    I actually would distrust someone who didn’t want another to read how to influence/manipulate others and how, since if they don’t know that, they don’t know how other people have been or will be trying to manipulate them. I always have felt I’d want more circles and protection before messing with Vassago.

    Much of the spell traditions in eclectic forms of Wicca are taken from the list you gave of 70′s books as well as Gray, Bardon, Crowley, Slater, and Cunningham, often altered slightly and unattributed and without clear detail of the whys and sources behind them.
    Do I think they’re necessary, yes.. if only because there are some relying on people not to have read these books so their little claims of ancientness and hereditary tradition don’t get *busted.* Being from the 70′s is a fine claim. Making lies up- says something’s wrong. I think mostly rehash books that don’t have the creativity in them are what people are reading most now, taking many times as long to explain the same things.


    I have had someone ask me what first book they’d recommend them. They don’t know what kind of Paganism or Wicca they’d find interesting, they don’t know what style Pagan they want to be. I was like trying to narrow it down to one book to first look at, and I could think of many books I’d like but I couldn’t think of any introductions that weren’t actually specific to a style.

    • Jo

      for an overview – Drawing Down the Moon by Margot Adler

      • ELNIGMA

        Thank you! Good choice.

  • Aine Llewellyn

    Sounds like a book I would have enjoyed far more than Ravenwolf’s! Even though I’m not a magical practitioner I enjoy reading about some of the practices, especially ones that don’t shy away from manipulation and the ‘darker’ practices.

  • Lēoht Sceadusawol

    I think I remember that book list.

    Was somewhat appalled that it was all ‘modern fare’.

    You’d think that the Eddas (poetic and prose) would be on there, along with the Mabinogion. Mind you, I think a lot of Pagans avoid looking at the historical references of deities, as it may conflict with the versions they have built in their heads.


    When did “Broomstick” come out? it says 2002 in Amazon, but I thought it was a bit earlier.
    Nevermind, I found it – 1993.
    ( Huson’s book I bought in ’97. )

  • Brawn Barber

    Again, a book. Not actual interaction with real practitioners or a coven of traditional basics. Knowing these through reading is only as good as reading any book.

    • Lēoht Sceadusawol

      Books are great, for theory, but not so great for practice.

      Maybe people need to start producing instructional DVDs?

      • Guest

        I’ve come across some good audio recordings but people tend to act and talk differently when they’re being filmed.

        • Lēoht Sceadusawol

          This is true. Still, could be an interesting concept, don’t you think?

    • Guest

      Not sure how reading a book means not learning from other people as well IRL. The real practitioners and HP/HPS good coven types I’ve met are also major book-hounds. People shouldn’t need someone to explain everything to them, they should be able to look up and learn a lot from books and the internet. A seeker for knowledge wherever available

  • Dea Monda

    I was never overly impressed with “mastering Witchcraft” however it was one of the few books available at the time whe i started studying. Huson’s book on the Tarot “The Devils’ Picturebook” was way more interesting and had a very good interpretation of the Major Arcana and Dionysus

  • Henry Buchy

    I’d hardly say Vassago is the most referenced in MW. Vassago is only mentioned in the chapter on divination.
    Also just because there may be similarities between somethings doesn’t imply influence, nor does being first to PUBLISH something imply it originates with that.
    Of course Modern Pagan Political correctness demands the reinforcement that it all started with GBG, and anything to the contrary is Fantasy of ignorant and delusional minds.

    • Henry Buchy

      sorry, I got cat posted while afk….
      There’s definitely a generational shift as you say. The approach to witchcraft shifted greatly during the 80′s and 90′s towards it being a religion rather than a religious practice, when cursing and hexing and more self centered intentions for magic use were seen as ‘not what witches do’.
      I think folks are more hungry as it were for the traditional approaches to magic, which have been pretty much washed out of witchcraft, and overtaken by this ‘religious’ thrust. Huson supplies more of that rather than religion. Folks are more interested in the crafting rather than the worshipping. of course that is anecdotal based on my own experiences in teaching craft over the last two or so decades.
      Second Huson shows something about old craft, and it syncretism and borrowing. Witchcraft has never been a ‘Religion’, it’s always been a magical practice, and a witch uses what works. It’s a science and art.

  • Archmaester Marwyn

    Here’s the difference between Huson and Silver — Huson broke new ground in a radical, non-traditional way that generated a wave of occult enthusiasm that endured into the 80′s, even helping to fuel the “Satanic Panic” of Geraldo Rivera fame.

    Silver Ravenwolf simply road the cozier, less choppy wake of that same wave. She didn’t initiate a movement; she just cashed in on one.

    While your arguments may be valid, let me emphasize that before Huson, there was no real popular text on witchcraft. You can hate early wheels but without them, and the guy who made them, you wouldn’t have the modern car.

    • JasonMankey

      As a piece of history Huson’s book is extremely important. It was the first Witchcraft “how to” book, and while it wasn’t as complete as what would come out just a few years later (The Tree, Lady Sheba) it was still first.

      I always feel weird defending Silver Ravenwolf, but I would argue that she did initiate a movement. She was one of the first authors who wrote about Witchcraft for older teens and young adults. Her early books appealed to an audience that hadn’t been targeted before.