The Popularity of Young-Earth Creationism Explained

It is easier to make fidelity to God about believing the absurd

A quote from a recent post.

"Specifically, a Platonic influence . Aristotle's psyche is much more along the lines of what ..."

Michael Pahl on Jesus and Gehenna
"I'm not quite sure what you're claiming here.Are you saying the consensus of mainstream historians ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?
"I interact with anyone who follows appropriate methods, and criticize them if they fail to ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?
"On the other hand, I have seen Wright cited as a leading authority on Paul ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • David Evans

    I have some sympathy with the YECs. They didn’t put the absurd stories in the Bible, the stories were there already. And sophisticated theologians may have known not to take them literally, but I heard no hint of that when I was attending an Anglican church regularly in the 1940’s and 50’s. If anyone had told me then that the Flood never happened, I think it would not have been long before I thought “If the Bible is wrong about that, why should it guide our actions more than any other ancient book?”

    • http://www.patheos.com/blogs/exploringourmatrix/ James F. McGrath

      Absurd stories can be found throughout human literature. It is those who read them an do problematic things with a subset of them that seem to me to be the issue.

      Of related interest, there was an interesting post by Samantha Field today about the fundamentalist mind: http://samanthapfield.com/2016/03/09/this-is-your-brain-on-fundamentalism/