NRA: The man who killed Bruce Barnes

Nicolae: The Rise of Antichrist, pp. 19-24

Book 2 of this series managed to be 450 pages long without much actually happening in those pages. Rayford Steele spent most of his time randomly flying from airport to airport, while Buck Williams always seemed to be driving in circles near Chicago.

But now things have changed. The second horseman of the apocalypse has arrived, bringing World War III. Book 3 starts with a bang and the plot is finally lurching forward. Now we’ve got some serious action: Rayford is still flying from airport to airport and Buck is still driving around in suburban Chicago — but Rayford is about to get a much nicer plane and Buck is about to get a much nicer SUV.

The Learjet was a six-seater. Carpathia and Fortunato, deep in conversation, ignored Rayford and Amanda as the couple passed. The Steeles ducked into the last two seats and held hands. Rayford knew global terror was entirely new to Amanda. It was new to him. On this scale, it was new to everyone.

Yes, people had seen global violence before, but not on such a global scale.

Carpathia turned in his seat to face them. He had that fighting-a-grin look Rayford found so maddening in light of the situation.

The Antichrist has irked both of the Steeles ever since they met up with him moments ago when he — conveniently, if inexplicably — turned up right there in suburban Chicago. Amanda is cross with him for pretending not to remember her name. Rayford is irritated that Nicolae seems enthused and excited by the outbreak of war.

It’s “maddening” to Rayford that Nicolae seems pleased by the carnage of war. The Antichrist is raining fiery death down on innocent people and he seems to be happy about it. That’s just evil. Rayford knows that fiery death from the skies is only cause for happiness when it comes from the hand of God, not from the hand of the Antichrist.

This moral logic can get a bit tricky to follow as the series goes on and the body count of the Great Tribulation accelerates. It’s very important for us, the readers, to keep track of the particular source of each ensuing incident of massive, indiscriminate death. Remember: massive, indiscriminate death is, in itself, morally neutral. The morality of such killing can only be determined by discerning who is doing the killing. If it’s the Good Side killing all those people, then such killing is good and righteous and praiseworthy. But if it’s the Bad Side doing the killing, then it’s bad, unrighteous and “maddening.”

If you lose track of which side is ladling out the death, then you might miss out on the happy ending toward which these books are headed. I don’t want to spoil that for you, but as the series develops, we’ll see that the Bad Side just isn’t able to keep up. As powerful as the Antichrist may be, he is no match for an omnipotent God. Thus the Good Side ultimately winds up indiscriminately killing way more people than the Bad Side does. And that of course means that the Good Side wins — something we can all celebrate.

For now, though, it’s understandable that Rayford and Amanda should be annoyed with Nicolae for his barely contained cheer and his odd ribbing of Amanda. What’s bizarre in these pages is that this is the only reason the Steeles are upset with him.

Rayford and Amanda have already completely forgotten this, so it’s easy for the reader to forget about it as well, but they also have a much larger, much more immediate reason to be furious with Nicolae: He just killed Bruce Barnes.

It’s been only two or three hours, at most, since Rayford identified Bruce’s lifeless body in the wreckage of the hospital destroyed by Carpathia’s missile strike. Bruce was supposedly one of Rayford’s closest, dearest friends, his irreplaceable mentor and beloved spiritual guide. But we don’t even need Bruce’s death here to see how inhumanly callous and shallow Rayford is behaving in this chapter.

This is what has just transpired in the past few hours of our story:

1. Rayford walks through the ruins of a hospital — a hospital — and sees dozens of bodies laid out under sheets on the lawn. He sees this, up close, and sees the still-smoldering wreckage of the building in which he knows that dozens, perhaps hundreds, more innocent people are dead or dying.

2. Shortly thereafter, Rayford is face to face with the man who ordered the destruction of that hospital. They shake hands. Then Rayford contemplates why this man failed to greet his wife by name.

Mostly, I think, this is just atrociously thoughtless writing.

Rayford doesn’t give another thought to the carnage at the hospital because Jerry Jenkins is so excited to get to the new plane and the new SUV that he can’t be bothered to write about much of anything else. He just doesn’t think to have Rayford respond to the death of his friend or the horror of the stricken hospital and he can’t be bothered to delay the neat-o plane and Range Rover business with some scene showing Rayford struggling to cope or working his way through denial, anger, bargaining or depression. Rayford is shown, very briefly, to be sad. And then he worries that he may have hurt his knees. And that’s that.

By the time Nicolae Carpathia arrives, Rayford is able to shake hands politely because that’s all done with and we can move along to savor the prospect of the Condor 216.

Yet I also think that Jenkins’ lazy thoughtlessness is reinforced by bad theology and bad politics, and that it can’t be easily separated from them.

Think of that ruined hospital and the row upon row of innocent dead laid out on the grass. To you and to me, a hospital is never, ever an acceptable target. A hospital is a place for the wounded and the sick and they are, by definition, neutral. To target the wounded and the sick and those who treat them is always a war crime — an atrocity.

But Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins don’t see it that way. They can’t see it that way. Their theology won’t allow it. Everything I’ve written above about “indiscriminate” killing or the “innocent” dead is disallowed by their wrathful doctrine that this is the fate that everyone deserves. There is no one innocent, no, not one. A wicked sinner in a hospital bed in the ICU is still a wicked sinner. And so is the nurse by that wicked sinner’s bedside. And they, like all wicked sinners, deserve only death, death and never-ending death at the hands of a righteously angry God.

For LaHaye and Jenkins, then, that makes a hospital as legitimate a target as any other place. They cannot make a distinction because their idea of God makes no such distinction. This is what their God does in their story. God kills indiscriminately because no one is innocent. God directs divine judgment at the wounded and the sick and those who care for them because they are no different from any other rebellious, left-behind sinner deserving to suffer great tribulation in the Great Tribulation.

Nicolae suggests that Rayford go sit in the cockpit:

“I know you are not certified on these little speedsters,” Carpathia said, “but you might learn something in the copilot’s chair.”

He’s got a point. Rayford’s on the clock, after all.

So for the next few pages, Rayford sits next to the pilot, chatting with his colleague and discussing their flight to Dallas much the way any two fellow-professionals might if World War III were not currently raging around and below them.

The pilot’s name is Chico Hernandez. In another book, that might seem a bit too much, but by the Tsion ben-Judah standards of ethnicky names in the Left Behind series, it almost seems subtle.

Chico and the man talk for a bit about the difference between flying this small jet and the passenger airliners Rayford is used to flying. And then, casually, as though discussing the weather, they briefly touch on the subject of the recently initiated global war.

“What tower do you connect with?” Rayford asked.

“The tower’s empty at Glenview,” Hernandez said. … “I’ll let a few towers know I’m coming along the way. The weather people tell us we’re clear all the way …”

So “the weather people,” apparently, fall into the same category as the journalists who are expected to produce all those “Dead Attack the Living” or “Asteroid Impact Imminent” headlines we see on newspapers in apocalyptic movies. I guess while the rest of the world scurries to shelter with armloads of ammo and canned goods, “the weather people” will be headed to the office, collecting the data from their miraculously still-functioning stations and satellites and keeping us all abreast of the latest on that high pressure system over the Great Lakes.

“The weather people tell us we’re clear all the way, and Global Community intelligence spots no enemy aircraft between here and touchdown.”

This inspires an odd reflection from Rayford on the militia movement — something that longtime John Birch Society member Tim LaHaye evidently admires:

Enemy aircraft, Rayford thought. There’s an interesting way to refer to American militia forces. He recalled not liking the militias, not understanding them, assuming them criminals. But that had been when the American government was also their enemy. Now they were allies of lame duck United States President Gerald Fitzhugh, and their enemy was Rayford’s enemy — his boss, of all things, but his enemy nonetheless.

The poor militia movement is just misunderstood. This recalls the sentiment in an infamous Bob Jones University Press history textbook:

Feeding on bigotry and racism, the Klan’s organizers resorted to intimidation and violence to keep blacks, Catholics and Jews “in their place.”

Paradoxically, the Klan in some areas of the country tried to be a means of reform, fighting the decline in morality and using the symbol of the cross. Klan targets were bootleggers, wife-beaters, and immoral movies. In some communities it achieved a certain respectability as it worked with politicians.

Sure, you can focus on the negative aspects of the militia movement and portray it as a bunch of racist, anti-Semitic gun-nuts plotting — and sometimes attempting — armed insurrection. But Rayford — and LaHaye — thinks such a glass-half-empty view obscures the positive side of the movement.

(I’m not sure how Fitzhugh managed to supply the militia with an air force, nor who is supposed to be flying those planes.)

Rayford has a more pressing question for Chico — the one question that Jenkins seems sure all of his readers are desperately awaiting an answer to:

“I’m curious about Global Community One,” Rayford said.

“You haven’t heard?” Hernandez asked.

“Negative.”

Big negative — and we’re all dying to know. This was the huge cliffhanger ending of Book 2 and here we are, a full chapter into Book 3, and yet we still don’t know what has become of the most important and most popular airplane in the whole wide world. Tell us –Tell us!

That, I suppose, is what Jenkins imagines readers are thinking here. This airplane, after all, was the focus of his most attentive and affectionate writing in Tribulation Force. He lovingly described every step of the plane’s journey to becoming Global Community One. Major developments in the story were otherwise only hinted at elliptically in the background of the latest news about the plane. This was how we learned, for example, of the implicit dissolution of America as a sovereign nation — we were never explicitly told that happened, but it was suggested by the changing identity of Global Community One. Media reports portrayed in that book also shared this priority as the latest news of the airplane led off broadcasts, receiving more attention than any of the sweeping political, economic, social, religious and linguistic changes taking place in the background.

The last we heard of the plane was in the final chapter of the last book, when Rayford asked his old friend Earl Halliday to fly it to New York City.

“There’s not good news out of New York.”

“I’d heard that,” Rayford said. “But I hadn’t heard how widespread the damage was at the major airports.”

“Just about total destruction, I understand. We know for sure that the hangar where she was located was virtually vaporized.”

This is becoming a running joke. An attack on Chicago is referred to as an attack on O’Hare. An attack on London is an attack on Heathrow. And the “news out of New York”? Total destruction at the major airports.

This is the full extent of the conversation between these two men about the obliteration of New York City. No discussion of the millions of people who live there, just the airports and, above all, that one special plane. It’s a running joke, just not a funny one.

“And the pilot?”

“Earl Halliday? He was long gone by the time of the attack.”

Rayford is happy to learn that his friend survived. To his credit, he even seems happier to hear of Earl’s survival than he is sad to learn of Global Community One’s destruction.

His relief at this news quickly turns to confusion when Chico mentions that “I’ve heard a lot about him in the past few weeks.”

And then Jenkins does that thing he likes to do when revealing something new to readers. He likes to build up the reveal by building up his protagonists’ confusion. So he doesn’t just let Chico tell us the big news here — that Earl Halliday, unbeknownst to Rayford, has been working for Carpathia for a long time, personally overseeing the design and construction of Nicolae’s new “Condor 216.” Instead, Jenkins drags it out over the next three pages, with Chico cheerfully saying things like “Who did you think?” and Rayford spluttering things like “Let me get this straight …” while taking the opportunity to retrace the last few months of his interactions with Earl in his mind.

So all that stuff we read before about Rayford and Earl? We get to read that again here.

Carpathia had asked Rayford to find someone to fly the Global Community One 757 to New York while Rayford and Amanda were taking a brief vacation in Chicago. Carpathia was to spend a few days confusing the press and the insurrectionists (President Fitzhugh and several American militia groups) by ignoring his published itinerary and being shuttled from place to place.

It’s a bit confusing that Nicolae worried about “confusing the press.” Nicolae owns the press. Nicolae is the press. We established that several hundred pages ago. Every reporter reports back to him. One-world media for the one-world government.

When you can use the press, there’s no need to bother with confusing them. No need to hopscotch about the country when he can just sit in front of a green screen in a single, secure location and make it look like he’s anywhere and everywhere else.

Eventually, it dawns on Rayford to be offended that he didn’t know about Earl and the Condor 216 business:

Rayford suddenly felt left out of the loop. “I wonder why I would not have been informed of a new plane, especially if I am supposed to be its pilot,” he said.

Finally, a few hours after touring the wrecked hospital, viewing the corpse of his dear friend, and learning of the total destruction of New York City, Rayford at last finds a reason to get angry.

  • Münchner Kindl

    So Nicky, who has no background in aviation or engineering, personally designed the new aircraft. And Earl was a pilot and Rayford’s supervisor; there’s no indication that he has any experience in designing or constructing aircraft. And yet Earl supervised the design and construction of the Most Important Airplane of All Time?
    I guess all parts and characters are interchangeable

    Like I said before: The only way that makes sense is if Jenkins is using the word “design” with a different meaning that usually. Nicky didn’t design the plane like an engineer would – he probably choose which colours to paint the outside with (probably some charming pastells, since he’s vaguely European -effeminate, not a manly man like Ray), after the engineers finished their decade-long work of developing the airplane. See the elaborate description and importance of changing the colour of (old) Air Force One from US design to Global Community One.

    Given the importance of the numerological play, he probably also choose the model name of Condor 216.

    Similar, Earl “designed” the plane by telling the engineers where to put which switch in the cockpit, and how the lever for the engines needs to look like (and maybe a pair of fuzzy dice on the backview mirror for Ray), so that Earl can assure Ray that it looks just like his old 747 (whatever) and Ray can therefore fly a completly new plane after 30 min. of instruction.

  • Münchner Kindl

    Not sure. I have the novelization of the orignal Alien Nation movie, and it comes up with the notion that since the Newcomer names were essentially unpronounceable, they needed to get “human” names as a way of identifying them. When you need to name 250,000 people it invites bone-weary government employees coming up with silly names for expediency.

    No question that there was an in-universe reason for the new names given. Even if the names had been pronouncable for Humans, nicknames would have quickly originated, and the next generation would have chosen very Earth-like first names, as we see with most immigrants trying to assimilate.

    Nevertheless, the question is: why did the writer hit upon that idea? Was he influenced by some real event or was it “just” a logical extension of thinking through a premise to the end? Another real historical case was Ellis Island, where apparently it was also common for the english-only speaking immigrant-officials to bowdlerize/simply the names of the often not-yet-English speaking immigrants.

    Second, needing to name 250 000 people quickly only invites govt. employees to come up with silly names if they have less respect for these Newcomers than for other people like WASPs, and if the public opinion/ official govt. rules didn’t explicitly forbid this.

    The respectful solution would be either to try to transcribe the names into English letters and then go with what closest resembles this in English, with input from the Newcomers; or to ask them what the names meant when the meaning was translated into English. Even an alternative like assinging everybody a number/ name combo George Smith 123 for a period of five years, so that the newcomers could learn language and culture and then chose a name they really like and switch to that would have been possible. Instead, the low-totem govt. officials had total power over people and abused that, which higher-ranking people could’ve/ should’ve foreseen and prevented. But since newcomers are just immigrants, similar to hispanics, who cares about their feelings, right?

  • Münchner Kindl

    Not sure. I have the novelization of the orignal Alien Nation movie, and it comes up with the notion that since the Newcomer names were essentially unpronounceable, they needed to get “human” names as a way of identifying them. When you need to name 250,000 people it invites bone-weary government employees coming up with silly names for expediency.

    No question that there was an in-universe reason for the new names given. Even if the names had been pronouncable for Humans, nicknames would have quickly originated, and the next generation would have chosen very Earth-like first names, as we see with most immigrants trying to assimilate.

    Nevertheless, the question is: why did the writer hit upon that idea? Was he influenced by some real event or was it “just” a logical extension of thinking through a premise to the end? Another real historical case was Ellis Island, where apparently it was also common for the english-only speaking immigrant-officials to bowdlerize/simply the names of the often not-yet-English speaking immigrants.

    Second, needing to name 250 000 people quickly only invites govt. employees to come up with silly names if they have less respect for these Newcomers than for other people like WASPs, and if the public opinion/ official govt. rules didn’t explicitly forbid this.

    The respectful solution would be either to try to transcribe the names into English letters and then go with what closest resembles this in English, with input from the Newcomers; or to ask them what the names meant when the meaning was translated into English. Even an alternative like assinging everybody a number/ name combo George Smith 123 for a period of five years, so that the newcomers could learn language and culture and then chose a name they really like and switch to that would have been possible. Instead, the low-totem govt. officials had total power over people and abused that, which higher-ranking people could’ve/ should’ve foreseen and prevented. But since newcomers are just immigrants, similar to hispanics, who cares about their feelings, right?

  • Münchner Kindl

    Interesting. The characters don’t sound as if they were written to have Jewish backgrounds *…

    That sounds more like a very stereotypical redneck/ country hick, including the Zeke. So another chance missed.

    Unless they reveal that their great-great-grandparents left Europe in the 1930s and renounced every part of their German heritage, so they not only don’t speak German anymore, they also use only Zeke instead of the full name.

    Though that doesn’t explain why the didn’t change the last name, esp. since name changes are easier under US law.

  • http://apocalypsereview.wordpress.com/ Invisible Neutrino

    Nevertheless, the question is: why did the writer hit upon that idea?
    Was he influenced by some real event or was it “just” a logical
    extension of thinking through a premise to the end?

    That, I don’t know. Novelizations of movies often are drawn from shooting scripts, so the scriptwriters are ultimately the ones to ask about why they came up with that back story.

  • hapax

    In a paradoxical way, that reminds me of a novel I read some time ago – I’ve forgotten the author and title.

    Kevin Brockmeier, The Brief History of the Dead.  I’d agree with all points of your review.

  • Tricksterson

    Same era but probably different locale.  When immigrants (Mostly East European Jews and Italians) came over to Ellis Island in the late 19th-early 20th their names were often “Americanized” sometimes voluntarily, sometimes not.

    I take it your either Austrian or German?

  • Phil_Malthus

    Lame Duck President = President of a country that no longer exists? (from being merged I mean, not the whole big-scarey-not-nukes)

  • Someguy

    How about they went and got the planes from  Davis-Monthan Air Force Base  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/309th_Aerospace_Maintenance_and_Regeneration_Group

  • Someguy

    I am reminded of the scene in The Godfather Part two, the immigration official is asking young Vito his name and he doesn’t answer, so another immigration official who is Italian, begins reading the note pinned to Vito that says “His name is vito Anodlini from Corleone Sicialy” The one writing down names says “okay Vito Colreone”

  • http://audioarchives.blogspot.com/ senor media

    One branch of my ancestors got Ellis-Island-ed from Spiezzielli to Spickle.
    Jerks

  • Steve Morrison

    Like I said before: The only way that makes sense is if Jenkins is using
    the word “design” with a different meaning that usually.

    Possibly Jenkins was thinking of the legend that Hitler “designed” the Volkswagen? (Apparently he told Ferdinand Porsche to make it streamlined “like a beetle”.)

  • Münchner Kindl

    Well, there are “interior designers” , aren’t there - those people who chose the fabrics and colours for tapestry, drapes and the Louis XIV furniture for expensive Manhattan apartments and houses of the rich? And those people in Hollywood movies or cheap comedies are either effeminate gays (because only gays know about colours and style) or women. (In First Wives Club, there’s such a guy, and when one of the women contemplates giving advice to her friends about decorating, there’s discussion on whether that would put him out of work).

    So maybe this is meant as underhand slur against Nicky for being effeminate and gay by designing, instead of developing, things?

    Possibly Jenkins was thinking of the legend that Hitler “designed” the Volkswagen? (Apparently he told Ferdinand Porsche to make it streamlined “like a beetle”.)

    I don’t know if Hitler’s involvment went even this far – aerodynamics was not much of a concern when building cars back then. The foremost connection is Hitler (or somebody around him) coming up with the idea that every upstanding German Volksgenosse should be able to afford a car, which was then a luxury item (imagine the small planes that celebrity own today). So he told Ferdinand Porsche to develop a car which would be cheap to produce, and instituted the savings plan for the KdF-Car (as it was known originally). Prospective buyers would buy stamps for 5 Marks each week (a lot back then) and stick them in a booklet; when the booklet was full, they would get a car. Except that the all the small savers and average citzens got cheated, because WWII started and the company built to produce their cars got converted to producing army cars /jeeps etc. instead.

    KdF = Kraft durch Freude (Strength through joy) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strength_Through_Joy was a very big Nazi organisation which organized vacation cheap for the average worker / citizen. For many people it was the first time in their lives that they could afford a vacation – or a car.

    The importance of this for the spirit of the population was not lost on the communists, who had similar projects after the war.

  • http://www.iki.fi/wwwwolf/ Urpo Lankinen

    This is becoming a running joke. An attack on Chicago is referred to as
    an attack on O’Hare. An attack on London is an attack on Heathrow. And
    the “news out of New York”? Total destruction at the major airports.

    And I still don’t really get why they’re nuking all these airports. Haven’t our esteemed writers read *any* military history? In WW2, one of the major headaches *every* army faced was that the airstrips were easy to put out of commission – the enemy does a single successful bombing run, and you can’t get up from there any more. And we’re obviously talking about conventional bombs here. And military tech has imporoved since those days. Send a single stealth bomber drop a big bomb smack dab in the middle of the runway, and you can be pretty certain the heavy passenger planes (like Air Force One) are stuck on the airport.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=30319652 Tim Lehnerer

    I was a little surprised that Rayford felt glad his friend wasn’t nuked.

  • http://apocalypsereview.wordpress.com/ Invisible Neutrino

    Incidentally, I remember reading once that the Volkswagen company honored the savings stamps after the war starting in 1947, so people could get the cars they’d legitimately paid for.

  • Münchner Kindl

    Incidentally, I remember reading once that the Volkswagen company honored the savings stamps after the war starting in 1947, so people could get the cars they’d legitimately paid for.

    Only partially. Reichsmark lost their value during the currency switch in 1948; this hit savings in the bank, and thus private people, harder than companies, whose hard assets (machines, factories) and rich people (houses) kept their value.

    The Deutsche Mark was introduced on Sunday, June 20, 1948 by Ludwig Erhard. The old Reichsmark and Rentenmark were exchanged for the new currency at a rate of DM 1 = RM 1 for the essential currency such as wages, payment of rents etc., and DM 1 = RM 10 for the remainder in private non-bank credit balances, with half frozen. Large amounts were exchanged for RM 10 to 65 pfennigs. In addition, each person received a per capita allowance of DM 60 in two parts, the first being DM 40 and the second DM 20.[4]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_mark#Currency_reform_of_June_1948

    Wikipedia says http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/KdF-Wagen

    Nach dem Krieg verloren die Anrechtsscheine im Wert von über 280 Millionen Reichsmark, die von etwa 340.000 Personen (davon 70.000 nach 1939) erworben worden waren, ihren Wert.[9] Viele Sparer versuchten ab 1948, ihre Ansprüche mit juristischen Mitteln durchzusetzen. Da das Volkswagenwerk aber nie in Besitz der Sparergelder auf einem Sperrkonto der Bank der Deutschen Arbeit gelangt war, endeten die Prozesse 1961 unter Ausschluss eines Rechtsanspruches mit dem Angebot der Volkswagenwerk AG, den KdF-Sparern einen Rabatt von 600 DM (entspricht heute 1.270 EUR) beim Kauf eines Fahrzeugs zu gewähren, was knapp einem Sechstel des Neupreises entsprach. Wer sich keinen neuen Wagen kaufen wollte oder konnte, erhielt 100 DM ausbezahlt.
    After the war the booklets worth over 280 Million Reichsmark, bought by about 340 000 People (including about 70 000 after 1939), lost their value. Many savers tried after 1948 to pursue their rights with legal methods. But because the Volkswagen company never got hold of the savings, which had been deposited onto a locked account at the bank of German work, the trials ended 1961 with the exclusion of a legal recognition with the offer by the Volkswagenwerk AG (Shareholding company), to give the KdF- savers a price reduction of 600 Dm (roughly 1 270 Euro today) when buying a new car. This amounted to about 1/6 of the new price. Those who didn’t or couldn’t buy a new car were paid 100 DM directly.

  • http://apocalypsereview.wordpress.com/ Invisible Neutrino
  • Rpb0918

    For the record, that croptduster was explicitly stated to have flown fighter jets in Vietnam in his prime. Haven’t read all the comments though, so I don’t know if anyone’s already replied to this. n.n’

  • Kelly

    Last night, my husband found the old Billy Mummy episode of Twilight Zone (entire town walks on eggshells because omnipotent 6-year-old kid can make anything he wants happen with his mind, and he does terrible things to “bad people” who don’t think everything he does is good) and we watched it with the kids.  When it was over, I was flipping through channels and came across the Left Behind movie running on some Christian network, and kinda like a bad train wreck, I couldn’t help but watch.

    Later, it occurred to me that Left Behind and the Billy Mummy Twilight Zone episode are the EXACT SAME STORY.  “Yes, God, it’s GOOD that you made all those people disappear, causing all those plane wrecks and car accidents.  It’s GOOD that you’re leaving the rest of us behind to suffer 7 years of tribulation, yes, it’s VERY GOOD that you did that.”

    The only difference is the Twilight Zone never tried to convince its audience that being at the whim of such a capricious, omnipotent child really WAS good.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X