2 years ago: Fake authenticity and pretending not to use hair products

November 25, 2011, here on slacktivist: Fake authenticity and pretending not to use hair products

The expert also says this is all silly. There’s nothing morally wrong with using products to keep your hair in place and there’s nothing shameful about deciding to keep your hair the same color it was when you were younger. The expert feels its an insult to her profession that candidates tend to lie about this sort of thing.

Political candidates have to go before the cameras on television — that means lots of work on hair and makeup, lots of necessary product, just to appear normal under the lights in high-def. We never criticize a candidate for wearing a shirt that’s been ironed, or a suit that’s been tailored, or for otherwise looking more presentable than someone who’s just rolled out of bed. But after several election cycles of stupidity and silliness around candidates’ hairstyles, the current vogue requires them to lie for the sake of “authenticity.”

And let’s be clear that this is what we’re doing. We expect and require our candidates to appear presentable. And at the same time we expect and require them to tell us that they expend no money or time meeting this expectation.

Warren Buffett: Slumlord and scurvy little spider
Taking too much too lightly
Setting half the trends we know
Left Behind Classic Fridays, No. 29: 'Sorrow Floats'
  • stardreamer42

    I’ve been fighting that assumption, on the personal level, for decades. I have never lied to anyone about my age (even though women are “supposed” to lie about their age), and I make absolutely no bones about the fact that my hair color comes out of a bottle. If somebody wants to make a big deal about that — well, that’s their problem, not mine.