Voter fraud in Massachusetts? UPDATED!

But of Course!. For goodness sake, when MSNBC (a real news outfit, per the WH) is declaring they’d vote “twenty times” for the Dem candidate (any Dem candidate), there is zero chance that the press would do anything but yawn and smile, if the special election in Massachusetts could be stolen.

There are over half a million dead people and other non-residents clogging the voter roles.

I know many are feeling confident, but I say don’t count your chickens. Unless Brown manages to pull off a win with a ten-point margin, expect this election to be “Franken-ized” until they “find” or “recount” the number of votes they need.

I think the Dems are being very stupid about this, myself. They should welcome a Brown win. He would be their salvation, as he would pull them out of their Obamacare quagmire, AND give them someone who is actually in office to demonize and hate, which Dems always need.

I’m going to assume Coakley wins MA until “every vote” is counted. And if the Dems cheat and take the seat, it will be filed, eventually, under a “Dumb Democrat Move.”

American Digest looks at the margin Brown needs

Instapundit has more as does Michelle Malkin

The Sec State of Mass says fraud is being reported. People are being handed ballots that are already filled out? That’s pretty brazen!

Campaign Spot and the Corner are two sites you’ll want to keep open for almost non-stop rolling updates.

David Brooks: still writes of Obama as though he is perfection incarnate, but hedges a little.

This is STUNNING: From Martha Coakley’s campaign, and dated YESTERDAY. Yes, YESTERDAY!

Campaign Manager Kevin Conroy:

We’ve received several independent and disturbing reports of voters across the state being handed ballots that are already marked in favor of Scott Brown. This is obviously a serious violation, and our legal team is taking immediate steps to protect the integrity of this election.

Honesty. Ethics. Holy. Moly. Even her cheating is incompetent:

(Screengrab from Mary Katharine Ham on Twitter)

About Elizabeth Scalia
  • Pingback: One if by ACORN, Two if by SEIU! « Temple of Mut

  • SuzyQ

    Anchoress, I have been waiting for these words from you and wondering when they were coming. I’ve had the same sense of foreboding myself. Frankenized, ACORNized, recounted ad infinitum while the Dems race to force through their agenda, certification delayed… Just you watch, Massachusetts.

    [I'm hoping to be surprised! :-) admin]

  • exhelodrvr

    I agree – I wonder if Obama really wants Coakley to win. If Brown wins, then they can blame the Republicans for not getting health care passed. If health care actually passes, the Democrats will have to live with the results, and it won’t be pretty.

  • Pingback: uberVU - social comments

  • Pingback: Amused Cynic » Blog Archive » Would the Dems actually launch a Doomsday Device in Massachusetts?

  • Bender

    Yes, notwithstanding recent polls, we really cannot be sure who is going to “win” because we don’t know what the cemetery turnout is going to be. I suspect, however, that the Dems are going to make sure to get a lot of the deceased to the polls this year. And if that is not enough, I’m sure that, a couple of days after, they will suddenly “discover” a whole boatload of ballots that were “lost” on election day.

  • saveliberty

    There are about two and a half more hours to vote in Massachusetts, so it is important to avoid overconfidence.

    However, it is not a good sign that the Coakley campaign has begun by blaming the primary voters and now is blaming the Obama Administration for her situation.

  • Margo

    Looks like Coakley’s site has changed the date of the “alert.”


  • saveliberty

    Bill Galvin says that there’s been no fraud.

    Jim Geraghty of Campaign Spot here: link

  • Larry Sheldon

    Early on before I had to hit the icy for haircuts, doctor’s appointments and all, I read somewhere that people had found ballots “pre-marked” for Coakley.

    My guess.

    SEIU goons set to premarking to set up thje “challenges” stuff, and then somebody said WAITAMINUTE! I know you were supposed to be marking for Coakley, but that is for afternoon when we find how many we need, NOW you are spposed to be marking from Brown to make him look bad.

  • Joe

    I have been watching Olbermann, because his tears are so delicious. They had a live shot of Matthews in some bar with two “sad” ladies on either side of him in the background. Then they panned out and people are laughing, making faces at Matthews, and even the “sad” women go out of character and one of them starts talking on her cell phone and doing the Carol Burnett pulling of the ear thing.

    It was awesome.

  • Gregory

    Brown has won… well, Coakley has conceded, at any rate.

  • Gayle Miller

    There is a YouTube video out there of an Hispanic woman named Isabella something or other, passing out blank absentee ballots yesterday and telling people how to mark them for Martha Coakley.

    I think this is the classic – if it isn’t close they cannot cheat situation. They didn’t have enough dead people lined up to vote for Coakley because they underestimated the size of the Scott Brown Tsunami. My best guess is that his actual win percentage was 10-14%!

  • Nicole

    Yay for the screen grab–they fixed the pr date on the web site.