A modern Pagan perspectivePosts RSS Comments RSS

Halloran's Faith in God

Here I thought I was done talking about New York City Council candidate, and “outed” Theodsman, Dan Halloran until after the elections. However, a loyal Wild Hunt reader alerted me to this recent op-ed in the Queens Chronicle where Halloran decides to talk about his faith journey. It starts, as all good stories do, at the beginning.

“I was raised a Roman Catholic right here in Auburndale. I was baptized into the Catholic Church and took my confirmation at 13.I attended Jesuit schools.Then and now, faith is a cornerstone of my life.”

OK, good so far, many Pagans/Heathens started out as Catholics. Next we come to a moment of personal tragedy and the resulting changes that it brought to Halloran’s religious perspective.

“The death of my father and its aftermath was very difficult for our family. I took comfort in my family’s history and our heritage, yet through all of this pain and hardship, I never lost faith in God.”

That’s certainly terrible about his father, but he never lost faith in “God”? Doesn’t he mean that he gained faith in many gods? Halloran is a polytheist, isn’t he? Lets go to an article Halloran wrote for The Witches’ Voice to make sure.

“The Theodish religious philosophy can be described as three interlocking sets of thews: A) The Votive Thews – i. Sacral Kingship, ii. Theodish Affinity – the Web of Troth and Oaths, and iii. worship of the Germanic Gods and Ancestors; B) The Criterial Thews – i. Life as a process of Ordeal, ii. Worthing and Becoming, and iii. its context of the Three Wynns – Wisdom, Generosity and Honor; and C) the Existential Thews – i. Freedom of Conscience, ii. Right Good Will, and iii. Sovereign Tribal Weal. These Three Rings of Thew [the “TRT”] are what binds together each tribe’s Theodsmen and makes possible the Theodish theological construct. Each of the thews interlock and are co-dependant, they are likewise situational and dependant on context for expression.”

That sounds pretty polytheist to me, maybe he’s just warming up people unfamiliar with Theodism. Let’s read on.

“Last week, I was attacked for my faith in the Queens Tribune.These attacks happened on the eve of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, the holiest time of the year for the Jewish people. Having been raised in a Catholic household that shares its religious roots with the Jewish faith, I was deeply offended that religion would be used for political gain … I am a man of faith – and now my faith is under attack by a newspaper working for my opponent.”

Huh? He’s trying to imply that the timing of the outing was offensive because it was near Jewish high holidays and he was raised Catholic? That makes almost no sense. Further, he keeps referencing “my faith” and that he’s a “man of faith” but does not once mention what, exactly, his faith is. I get that he doesn’t want his faith to be used against him in this race, but the nature of that faith is out of the bag, repeatedly invoking a singular “God” while talking about Catholicism and Judaism to the exclusion of his actual chosen faith simply reinforces the notion that he’s hiding something. Anyone reading this remains entirely unclear as to what Halloran’s current faith is, unless he’s saying that Theodism is more a cultural practice for him, and that he remains a Judeo-Christian-style monotheist. Is that what he is saying?

Whatever Halloran’s actual beliefs are at this point, he needs to be clear about them. Misdirection or invocations of family history, however noble, won’t erase the questions people have. Will perceived political necessities make someone who once openly advocated for Pagan rights keep quiet?

ADDENDUM: Dan Halloran, in a letter to me, offered the following clarifying statement.

“I honor my Ancestors and cling to my Hiberno-Norse Culture’s Worldview. I revere my God (Tiw)- and henotheistically I may add- a fact NEVER HIDDEN from ANYONE who has had a theological discussion with me ANYTIME in the last 10 years- and I respect the Gods of the North and Wights of Middenyard. I have been part of the Heathen community in New York for 20 years and particularly Theodish for over 12 years.  I have served the Troth for over 18 years in a variety of religious and secular ways. Whatever necessary political discussions take place – I have never hidden my religion- it’s on my facebook, in courts – judges and counsels in the Courts I practice are aware, I’ve been the corporate counsel for a variety of pagan groups- and have lectured and discussed theology all over the US.  I disclosed my religious affiliations to the Queens County GOP prior to running.  My license plate on both my car and truck are Tiw Tru and Tyr Tru respectively.”

So that should clear up at least some of the questions folks have.

20 responses so far

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/thewildhunt Jason Pitzl-Waters

    I hope his statements were reported correctly since he wrote the piece.

  • GreenPagan

    "Pagan Republican" seems oxymoronic to me. How do they reconcile this? "Pagan Libertarian" is even worse I suppose.

  • Heather

    The banks & big business love your Libertarian support and thank you for allowing them to rob us blind.

  • Jake

    Were you asleep the past eight years? Bush was the biggest regulator of business and the economy since Nixon.

  • Jake

    People who don't realize that conservatism predates the 80s won't understand this.

  • Richard Nixon

    LOL ~ Politicans are sooooooooooo dumb.

  • Nick Ritter

    I would like to expand on that and state, for the record, that Dan and his theod are *not* representative of Theodism as a whole

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/PaulFirehawk PaulFirehawk

    In what way exactly?

  • Bojojohn

    Thank you, Travis, for that clarification…appreciate it.

  • Heather

    Bush has certainly put regulations regarding civil freedoms but I also agree he let those with the right amount of money and connections put this country into the toilet.

  • Riverbend

    That's "God HERself" (though she spells it "hirself"). BIG difference, and an interesting way to acknowledge both male and female aspects of divinity.

  • Souris

    See, they always say that, but there hasn't been a fiscally conservative republican president in my lifetime.

  • Souris

    EXACTLY! Thank you.:)

  • E.G.

    Agreed. For some reason "in theory" and "in reality" tend to be wildly different when it comes to politics.

  • Nick Ritter

    I find nothing there to disagree with.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Lokisgodhi Lokisgodhi

    I think your date is a bit off, unless your referring to decade of 80 to 89 C.E.

  • Travis

    I'm steward of Sweartfenn Theod BTW. I don't see anything there to disagree with. I concur. I

  • http://egregores.blogspot.com/ apuleius platonicus

    Well at least we have the internet, thanks be to Hermes and Hephaistos!

  • Bookhousegal

    .Hail. :) So, indeed, though I suspect there's many more Gods to thank as well. :)

  • Valadia

    Stacey, just an FYI. I am my Lord Dan's Thane. He is NOT a king, he is an Earl. Literally. WE as a Theod did NOT raise him on a shield, and crown him king.