September 11, 2011

For several years now on September 11th, I have re-posted this article with minimal edits. In many ways, nothing much has changed as the years have gone by. I think therefore that this is for me the most appropriate way to mark the ten year anniversary of the most shocking event of my lifetime.

The world will never forget 911. Each year I say it, but it still feels in a way like yesterday, despite the fact it is an age ago. We now live in the post 911 world. I am not American, and until early 2003 I had never been to New York. On 9/11, I didn’t lose a loved one or a friend. But I remember seeing the second plane hit the building live on TV and, just as promised, it was a day that changed history.

It was a day that marked the expansion of the global village. Somehow the world seemed to immediately know something had happened- it was as though a sharp intake of breath occurred simultaneously around the globe. I remember sensing that something had happened from inside my room in the office I then worked in. For all of us, work was immediately forgotten. As I went out of my room to find out what it was that I somehow knew was wrong, a colleague told me what had happened and we all went upstairs to watch the terrible events unfold. Holidays were canceled. Business trips were prolonged or postponed. We all remember where we were that day and how we headed for our homes just as quickly as we were able to.

It was a day when family and friends were suddenly more valued. In a moment security could never again be taken for granted. In 2003, when I first wrote this article, here in the UK we were still awaiting the attack we had all felt in that moment to be imminent, and which our leaders were telling us was inevitable. In the end, we were spared by something of a miracle the same extent loss of life when Islamic extremists attacked our underground system. If their devices had been more potent, every person on each of those subway trains would have died, possibly with even greater loss of life than New York had experienced. At another point, the conviction of those responsible for a liquid explosives plot to destroy multiple planes over the Atlantic reminded that the risk has not gone away.We would be foolish to conclude we are now safe.

It was a day when a war was declared that by our own admission can never be won. It was a day that we all pray will never be surpassed in the sheer scale of its cruelty, although the same evil displayed has been amply displayed since in various attacks.

It was a call to fight, but also a call to reach out. It led immediately to many unanswered questions- How could people act in this way? Why was anyone willing to be sympathetic to the views of such men? Why was condemnation not forthcoming from every member of the world? Why do some people still hate Americans? Why are some apparently respectable Muslims at least partly sympathetic to the terrorists?

What really saddens me to this day is that even such an act, or acts such as torturing and murdering schoolchildren, are not enough to make every single person throughout the world state “this is evil and we renounce it totally” I hope that today brings shame to those who in the past have toyed with terrorism- the Irish Terrorists and those who funded them, for example. For Irish terrorism and other groups around the globe helped to lay the foundations and show the way for small groups of people to hold the entire world to ransom. I may not have been in New York before that event, but I had previously felt the blast wave of two IRA bombs in London.

In the end 911 was, however, a single day. A very important day, but it was nonetheless just a day. Part of history that can never be erased but just one day. We have had evil days before and we will have them again. Without minimising the pain of this day, or for a moment suggesting that we should turn back the clock or stop commemorating it, it was just a day. Somehow such days must be integrated and life must continue, as indeed it has.

I am glad that for my family this date in the year we also have positive connotations to remember it by in the future. Today is also the anniversary of the day my brother got married. I am glad that this was on 9/11 because why should we let the terrorists totally occupy the territory of one of our 365 days? Do they also now own another one after 3/11 in Spain? What about 7/7 when they attacked London? Can nothing good ever happen again on 9/11? They got their wedding cheaper because most people did not want to marry that day.

I thank God today, a few hours before Americans will awaken to 911 for all the marriages that have taken place on 9/11, for all the babies that have been born, for all the human achievements that have been completed, and in short for all the lives that continue this 9/11.

Our very resilience and determination shows that terrorism will never beat the human spirit. Sadly, one of the costs of living in freedom is that evil men will always have the opportunity to strike again. I am glad that I am not one of the leaders responsible for trying to minimise our risks. It is very easy to criticise, but today of all days lets pray for wisdom for Obama, for Cameron and for all other world leaders.

September 11, 2010

This is now the third time I have posted this article. In many ways, nothing much has changed as the years have gone by. I have therefore lightly edited the article but republish it today more or less as I originally published it.

The world will never forget 911. Each year I say it, but it still feels in a way like yesterday, despite the fact it is an age ago. We now live in the post 911 world. I am not American, and until early 2003 I had never been to New York. On 9/11, I didn’t lose a loved one or a friend. But I remember seeing the second plane hit the building live on TV and, just as promised, it was a day that changed history.

It was a day that marked the expansion of the global village. Somehow the world seemed to immediately know something had happened- it was as though a sharp intake of breath occurred simultaneously around the globe. I remember sensing that something had happened from inside my room in the office I then worked in. For all of us, work was immediately forgotten. As I went out of my room to find out what it was that I somehow knew was wrong, a colleague told me what had happened and we all went upstairs to watch the terrible events unfold. Holidays were canceled. Business trips were prolonged or postponed. We all remember where we were that day and how we headed for our homes just as quickly as we were able to.

It was a day when family and friends were suddenly more valued. In a moment security could never again be taken for granted. In 2003, when I first wrote this article, here in the UK we were still awaiting the attack we had all felt in that moment to be imminent, and which our leaders were telling us was inevitable. In the end, we were spared by something of a miracle the same extent loss of life when Islamic extremists attacked our underground system. If their devices had been more potent, everyone on each of those subway trains would have died, possibly with even greater loss of life than New York had experienced. At another point, the conviction of those responsible for a liquid explosives plot to destroy multiple planes over the Atlantic reminded that the risk has not gone away. We would be foolish to conclude we are now safe.

It was a day when a war was declared that by our own admission can never be won. It was a day that we all pray will never be surpassed in the sheer scale of its cruelty, although the same evil displayed has been amply displayed since in various attacks.

It was a call to fight, but also a call to reach out. It led immediately to many unanswered questions- How could people act in this way? Why was anyone willing to be sympathetic to the views of such men? Why was condemnation not forthcoming from every member of the world? Why do some people still hate Americans? Why are some apparently respectable Muslims at least partly sympathetic to the terrorists?

What really saddens me to this day is that even such an act, or acts such as torturing and murdering schoolchildren, are not enough to make every single person throughout the world state “this is evil and we renounce it totally” I hope that today brings shame to those who in the past have toyed with terrorism- the Irish Terrorists and those who funded them, for example. For Irish terrorism and other groups around the globe helped to lay the foundations and show the way for small groups of people to hold the entire world to ransom. I may not have been in New York before this year, but I have felt the blast wave of two IRA bombs in London.

In the end 911 was, however, a single day. A very important day, but it was nonetheless just a day. Part of history that can never be erased but just one day. We have had evil days before and we will have them again. Without minimising the pain of this day, or for a moment suggesting that we should turn back the clock or stop commemorating it, it was just a day. Somehow such days must be integrated and life must continue, as indeed it has.

I am glad that for my family this date in the year we also have positive connotations to remember it by in the future. Today (six years ago) my brother got married. I am glad that this was on 9/11 because why should we let the terrorists totally occupy the territory of one of our 365 days? Do they also now own another one after 3/11 in Spain? What about 7/7 when they attacked London? Can nothing good ever happen again on 9/11? They got their wedding cheaper because most people did not want to marry that day.

I thank God today, a few hours before Americans will awaken to 911 for all the marriages that have taken place on 9/11, for all the babies that have been born, for all the human achievements that have been completed, and in short for all the lives that continue this 9/11.

Our very resilience and determination shows that terrorism will never beat the human spirit. Sadly, one of the costs of living in freedom is that evil men will always have the opportunity to strike again. I am glad that I am not one of the leaders responsible for trying to minimise our risks. It is very easy to criticise, but today of all days lets pray for wisdom for Obama, for Cameron and for all other world leaders.

July 12, 2005

One of the best thing about blogging is you get to mercilessly copy others good ideas. My blogspotting posts will be rather more like the modified version pyromaniac is planning on implementing. I will try and link to as many people who have linked to individual posts of mine, but make no guarentee of linking to everyone! Hopefully this will encourage people to let me know if they have linked- and yes, I will link to dissenting posts!

Parableman thinks I got I could have a new career as a bible translator. Pyromaniac said “he’s as amiable and interesting in person as he is on line”. SmartChristian is glad I have finally taken the plunge and downloaded Skype and says “all” Christian bloggers should do the same- watch out Andrew, that kind of talk has got me in trouble many a time! At least our catholic friend also welcomed me.

Thinking Christian pointed readers towards me for London news as did Jack, Beyond the rim, allthings, jollyblogger, Gadabout LaShawn and others. Thanks everyone for your support! I even got the nearest thing to an Instalaunche I ever expect to have when Glenn linked to the UK Blogs aggregator which I am a member of.

Blogotional rightly believes suspects I may have a great multi-cultural church whilst this brother wishes he had been as fortunate.

May 13, 2005

In How to be a successful blogger part 1 I discussed some simple blogger settings and advised people to submit to google and use pingomatic and then in part 2 I discussed how to define success.

There are three factors critical to success as a blogger if for you part of success means being read
1- Making google your friend
2- Becomming part of a community
3- Using RSS/Atom/XML wisely

The best thing about search engines is they all work together by and large and all tend to follow google like a flock. Bizarrely several search engine robots arrived at my site today within an hour of each other to index it- makes you think they hunt in packs!

Fortunately for you google loves blogs already, and if you focus on issues 2 and 3 google will also like you even more.

I don’t mean to brag, but I have just trawled through a 20 page report which in close print lists the different keyword phrases people have used to find this blog from search engines in about the last 3 months. In all honesty, I have done nothing new in those months to try and drive traffic here from search engines. Why did I have almost 4000 keyword combinations leading people to my site in that time? It is simply because I have implemented some totally legitimate ways of making this blog google friendly in an ongoing way which requires absolutely no efffort on my part. I will share these with you.

How can I make google my friend?

  • Choose the title of your blog sensibly, and ensure that your page has a title implemented in the header (this will also be seen at the top of the browser window) I would strongly advise the inclusion of the word “Blog” in your title somewhere- tell people what it actually is.

  • Include the above title in text form (NOT just a graphic) in the first paragraph of text the robot will get to read.
  • Add other Meta tags although these are less crucial
  • Update your blog reasonably frequently
  • When constructing your site, ensure that all your pages include a link back to your main page.
  • Ensure that the title of each post is active as a hyperlink to the full version of the post (ie if you click on the post title- in this case “how to be a succesful blogger….” it should take you to the post- ensure that you have implemented individual post pages also.
  • Ensure that you have an archive and that links to the archive pages are available early in your webpage as it is read by a search engine robot.
  • Ensure that your main content is available early in the page and that content drops off your front page neither too quickly or too slowly- something like a minimum of a weeks worth of posts should be available on your main page

2. Become part of a community

Google LOVES community almost as much as we do. There is no better way yet invented for it to work out what people want to visit than link counting and the use of the words that are in links. The best thing about this is that it seems that sites which are themselves generous with links to other sites are liked by google too. Try and ensure that you both give and receive links freely. Try and get into the habit of linking to a blog not by its name but rather by a phrase that is relevant. So for example, if I wanted to link to this post as a fellow blogger I should really write something like “Adrian Warnock has an interesting post about google optimisation for bloggers.” I know I don’t always do this, but every time anyone links to a url and uses a phrase to describe that URL it is simply a vote for that phrase to be linked to that url. If several bloggers link to a site in the same way, it will have a higher chance of jumping up the rankings.

Some people get annoyed about this and call it “google bombing” and certainly it can be taken too far. The lines are difficult to draw, however. What if I was to srnd to some of my blogging friends the following as an email-

“look, would you consider doing me a favour, my london church is trying to get a few more hits to its website- would you consider the next time you refer to me in a blog post saying something like ‘Adrian Warnock, a blogger and a preacher at a london church recently said’ to give us a hitch up”.

Would that be going too far? Certainly it would probably only take a handful of bloggers to influence that particular search engine result- would clubbing together to use our power in that way be unacceptable?

I personally think that linking should be done to sites you like without an expectation of a return, but if you do link either to the site or a specific post, as I have said before for goodness sake let them know- they may decide that they too like your site. Do NOT however believe that a link on your site somehow buys a link on someone elses- if you take bloggers kindness for granted you will soon realise your mistake!

Community should not be formed merely for the sake of influencing search engine results. However, do try to form friendships online with bloggers that arrise out of shared interests and views that also involve regular linking on commenting on one anothers posts (eg the way I and Jollyblogger and increasingly the Warnie award winners group do). Dont abuse other bloggers, but assuming you are not being cynical, you can enjoy your interactions safe in the knowledge that a useful by-product is that you are probably building your search engine rankings.

Similarly, building community can also mean joining blogroll and/or aggregation lists like the blogdom of God. This WILL boost your rankings, but should not be done solely for this purpose- people might find you out! Currently, I am not processing new members to the Blogdom of God itself. Instead, people can join the Evangelical Aggregator (which is in turn a member of the blogdom of God and aggregates there) and ask Stephen to include them in the Blogdom of God blogroll as well.

If you want into the BofG and are not evangelical, you can join one of the other aggregators which are being included in the aggregator, and there should shortly be some other member aggregators which can also add you to the blogdom of God blogroll.

Remember, you are in the blogosphere to give something back- so always, always be on the look out for great posts that other people have written and great blogs you can link to.

Dont be shy about commenting on other peoples blogs, and a comment like “Great post, I have written about this over on my blog at www.yoursite.com” will be greatfully received by most bloggers (provided you really HAVE written about it and you really DID like the post!)

3. Use RSS/Atom/XML

If your blog system doesnt provide a feed, change your blog system. The help files for each system should explain how to implement them. Just make sure that it is listed on your site, and that you always use pingomatic to update the various blog-specific seach engines that you have posted. I checked again, and currently I actually have eight times the number of visitors to my XML

file than I have to my index page! So get the old feed going!

August 25, 2003

Winston Churchill Home Page:

“‘Be Ye Men of Valour’

‘Blood, Toil, Tears & Sweat’

‘Captain of our Souls’

‘Child of the House of Commons’

‘A Dark and Deadly Valley’

‘Finest Hour’

‘I’d Drink It [Poison]’

‘I leave when the pub closes’

‘Linchpin of the English-speaking world’

”Lousy’ as a Parliamentary Expression’

‘Never Give In’

‘Some chicken! Some neck!’

‘So much owed by so many to so few’

‘Sugar Candy’

‘This is not the end.’

‘Total and unmitigated defeat’

‘Up with which I will not put’

‘War of Unknown Warriors’

‘We shall fight on the beaches.’

‘We Shape Our Buildings’

‘Be Ye Men of Valour’

‘Arm yourselves, and be ye men of valour, and be in readiness for the conflict; for it is better for us to perish in battle than to look upon the outrage of our nation and our altar.’ This call and spur to the faithful servants of Truth and Justice was quoted by Churchill in his first broadcast as Prime Minister to the British people on the BBC – May 19, 1940, London.

‘Blood, Toil, Tears & Sweat’

‘I would say to the House, as I said to those who have joined this government: I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat.’ –Speech made to House of Commons on May 13, 1940, three days after becoming Prime Minister. Churchill first used it earlier in the day when he spoke to his Cabinet which represented all parties.

‘Captain of our Souls’

Today we may say aloud before an awe-struck world: ‘We are still masters of our fate. We are still captain of our souls.’ Prime Minister’s Speech on the War Situation, House of Commons, September 9, 1941

‘Child of the House of Common”

I am a child of the House of Commons. I was brought up in my father’s house to believe in democracy. Trust the people – that was his message….I cannot help reflecting that if my father had been American and my mother British, instead of the other way around, I might have go here on my own….I owe my advancement entirely to the House of Commons, whose servant I am. In my country, as in yours, public men are proud to be the servants of the State and would be ashamed to be its masters. – -Speech made to a Joint Session of the American Congress, December 26, 1941. Churchill went to America after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. He predicted a “long and hard war.” His speech was broadcast throughout the US, Canada and Britain.

“A Dark and Deadly Valley”top^

“Indeed I do not think we should be justified in using any but the more sombre tones and colours while our people, our Empire, and indeed the whole English-speaking world are passing through a dark and deadly valley.” Speech given in the House of Commons, January 22, 1941

“Finest Hour”top^

“Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that if the British Empire and Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, This was their finest hour.” — Speech delivered to the House of Commons on June 18, 1940 following the collapse of France. Many thought Britain would follow. But knowing that “Hitler will have to break us in this island or lose the war” Churchill challenged the British people to uncommon efforts to win the Battle of Britain.

“I’d drink it [poison]”top^

Lady Astor: “Winston, if I were your wife I’d put poison in your coffee.”

Winston: “Nancy, if I were your husband I’d drink it.”

This exchange is sometimes attributed to Winston’s good friend F.E. Smith, but in Consuelo Vanderbilt Balsan’s The Glitter and the Gold she writes that the exchange occurred at Blenheim when her son was host. See also the American edition of Martin Gilbert’s In Search of Churchill (not in the British edition). In Nancy: The Life of Lady Astor, Christopher Sykes confirms Consuelo Balsan’s account. “It sounds like an invention but is well authenticated. [Churchill] and the Astors were staying with Churchill’s cousin, the Duke of Marlborough, at Blenheim Palace. Nancy and Churchill argued ferociously throughout the weekend.”

“I leave when the pub closes.”top^

At the end of the war, before the election that he lost in 1945, The Times of London prepared an editorial suggesting that he campaign as a nonpartisan world leader and retire gracefully rather soon afterward. The editor first informed Churchill that he was going to make these two points. “Mr. Editor,” Churchill said to the first point, “I fight for my corner.” And, to the second: “Mr. Editor, I leave when the pub closes.”

“Linchpin of the English-speaking world”top^

“Canada is the linchpin of the English-speaking world. Canada, with those relations of friendly, affectionate intimacy with the United States on the one hand and with her unswerving fidelity to the British Commonwealth and the Motherland on the other, is the link which joins together these great branches of the human family, a link which, spanning the oceans, brings the continents into their true relation and will prevent in future generations any growth of division between the proud and the happy nations of Europe and the great countries which have come into existence in the New World.” Speech given at a luncheon in honour of Mackenzie King, Prime Minister of Canada, Mansion House, London, September 4, 1941.

“Lousy’ as a Parliamentary Expression”top^

The new Minister of Fuel and Power, Hugh Gaitskell, later Attlee’s successor as leader of the Labour Party, had advocated saving energy by taking fewer baths: “Personally, I have never had a great many baths myself, and I can assure those who are in the habit of having a great many that it does not make a great difference to their health if they have less.” Churchill, a renowned bather, responded: “When Ministers of the Crown speak like this on behalf of HM Government, the Prime Minister and his friends have no need to wonder why they are getting increasingly into bad odour. I have even asked myself, when meditating upon these points, whether you, Mr. Speaker, would admit the word ‘lousy’ as a Parliamentary expression in referring to the Administration, provided, of course, it was not intended in a contemptuous sense but purely as one of factual narration.”

“Never Give In”top^

The speech was made 29 October 1941 to the boys at Churchill’s old public [private] school, Harrow–not Oxford or Cambridge:”Never give in–never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.”

“Some chicken! Some neck!”top^

“When I warned them that Britain would fight on alone, whatever they did, their Generals told their Prime Minister and his divided cabinet that in three weeks, England would have her neck wrung like a chicken – Some chicken! Some neck!” — Speech made to the Canadian Parliament on December 30, 1941. Following this speech the famous Karsh photograph was taken.

“So much owed by so many to so few”top^

“Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.”– Speech made in the House of Commons as the Battle Britain peaked on August 20, 1940. The home front was totally involved in the war because of the Germany bombing raids and Britain was “a whole nation fighting and suffering together.” But special gratitude was directed towards the airmen whose prowess and devotion were capable of turning the tide of the war. Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few. He worked out the phrase in his mind as he visited the Fighter Command airfields in Southern England.

“Sugar Candy”top^

“We have not journeyed across the centuries, across the oceans, across the mountains, across the prairies, because we are made of sugar candy.”– -Speech made to the Canadian Parliament, December 30, 1941.

“This is not the end.”top^

“This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.” Speech given at the Lord Mayor’s Luncheon, Mansion House, London, November 10, 1942.

“Total and unmitigated defeat”top^

“We have sustained a total and unmitigated defeat, and France has suffered even more than we have.” – Speech made during debate on Munich Agreement in House of Commons, October 5, 1938. Nancy Astor heckled him by calling out “Nonsense.”

“Up with which I will not put”top^

After receiving a Minute issued by a priggish civil servant, objecting to the ending of a sentence with a preposition and the use of a dangling participle in official documents, Churchill red pencilled in the margin: “This is the sort of pedantry up with which I will not put.”

“War of Unknown Warriors”top^

“This is a war of the unknown warriors; but let all strive without failing in faith or in duty, and the dark curse of Hitler will be lifted from our age.” Broadcast on the BBC, July 14, 1940.

“We shall fight on the beaches”top^

“We shall fight on the beaches. We shall fight on the landing grounds. We shall fight in the fields, and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills. We shall never surrender!” Speech about Dunkirk given in House of Commons June 4, 1940.

“We Shape Our Buildings”top^

“On the night of May 10, 1941, with one of the last bombs of the last serious raid, our House of Commons was destroyed by the violence of the enemy, and we have now to consider whether we should build it up again,and how, and when. We shape our buildings, and afterwards our buildings shape us. Having dwelt and served for more than forty years in the late Chamber, and having derived very great pleasure and advantage therefrom, I, naturally, should like to see it restored in all essentials to its old form, convenience and dignity.”

-WSC, 28 October 1943 to the House of Commons (meeting in the House of Lords).

Notes: The old House of Commons was rebuilt in 1950 in its old form, remaining insufficient to seat all its members. Churchill was against “giving each member a desk to sit at and a lid to bang” because, he explained, the House would be mostly empty most of the time; whereas, at critical votes and moments, it would fill beyond capacity, with members spilling out into the aisles, in his view a suitable “sense of crowd and urgency.”


Browse Our Archives